- Joined
- 14 February 2005
- Posts
- 15,534
- Reactions
- 18,255
And to continue my previous post, this "blanket XYZ level tariff on each country" is the exact kind of sledgehammer approach I've been referring to.
The problem I have with the sledgehammer approach, as someone who's fundamentally a detail and technical person, is it invariably ends up breaking something that's seriously hard to fix.
Been there, seen that game in real life and it ain't pretty. Eventually it gets fixed but not without costing a fortune, ending careers, permanently closing businesses, etc.
But I'm giving Trump some benefit of the doubt simply because he's the only show in town, no other recent president has even tried. That being so, well I guess he reasons that he's only got 4 years, and even that could plausibly be cut short due to health given his age, so it's a case of going in all guns blazing.
In terms of trading shares though, with the approach taken I very much doubt we've seen the bottom yet. When the bull's still in the china shop, something's going to break almost certainly.
What's the bet there's already a few "dead man walking" type situations with hedge funds and the like that didn't allow for that level of volatility?
Personally, for my own active trading of ASX shares I've completely paused all buying at present. I still own quite a few, they're not being sold other than in the normal manner, but I've paused buying for the simple reason that this sort of scenario isn't something that was modelled or back tested. Normal market declines yes, but not what amounts to the active market intervention of the US President with an unclear objective.
I say that noting my system told me to go all in on stocks, 100%, and I just don't trust that signal given the situation. Time will tell.
