- Jun 8, 2008
Just that Luutzu believes truely that the middle east mess is involved in a way in the aspirations of these born and bred in Europe guys to blow everything up.Seems your crystal ball is working well there
The rosy picture portrayed by the left generally but not only, genuinely does not want to consider that religion IS the factor.
The fact that the muslims terrorists are from arab background is just the result of european policies of the past.
With the same radical training, indonesian or black africa origins would results in the same outcomes with no need for permanent conflict to inflame the dim wits.
Islam is not bad but the fanatical version spread amoung billions by the Saudis (salafism) is the equivalent of the rabid Christian in the US.Religion is the problem, and it can only worsen the more we import the fanatical view via unwanted migration (I wanted to use illegal but in Europe law does not mean anything anymore) and/or tacid support of the "evangelists" already there.Aim is clearly world domination: except for south america?, i believe they are on their way worldwide.
So yes migration is key in that regard and especially muslim one.
Are people "bad' because they are muslims? of course not but a blanket policy is the best way for a society as a whole to preserve itself.
Immunisation is good for society but may be bad for a few individuals, so any decent government should apply it for the common good;
Selective migration is the same.
Europe failed and is a done deal, wait for the current wave offsprings to get in their 20s and news will not be as mild.
This is before even considering any economic/social structure and ecological impact of migration, and the effect on countries of origin as well as "hosting/invaded" ones .Anyway have all a nice easter.