Where is/can Donald Trump take US (sic)?

[luutzu]

Major suck up to the Emperor :

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...nternet-is-poking-fun/?utm_term=.9f1bdbbf8d97

Another surreal moment.

They're worshipping a failed business "tycoon" who cheats people out of money; a loudmouthed reality-TV braggart... right?

These are guys that head government departments at the highest level of the empire right?

Anyone who honestly praises Trump shouldn't be taken seriously. And if they're liars, maybe they shouldn't be trusted with affairs of state.

 

[basilio]

That was So,so special. To see such and impressive line up of absolute sucks trying to outdo each other to bring El Presidente to glory. I swear he came at least 3 times during those speeches.

It reminded me of an old story told about the adulation of Uncle Joe Stalin by the masses after his public addresses.

Apparently the unrestrained clapping went for many, many minutes and impressed almost all the foreign observers reporting on the progress of the Russian Revolution and the love of the workers for their beloved.

What they didn't know was that the NKVD secret service were throughout the crowd and the word was that the first people who stopping clapping would be flogged or shot. Certainly sharpened their focus...

 

[luutzu]

That was So,so special. To see such and impressive line up of absolute sucks trying to outdo each other to bring El Presidente to glory. I swear he came at least 3 times during those speeches.

It reminded me of an old story told about the adulation of Uncle Joe Stalin by the masses after his public addresses.

Apparently the unrestrained clapping went for many, many minutes and impressed almost all the foreign observers reporting on the progress of the Russian Revolution and the love of the workers for their beloved.

What they didn't know was that the NKVD secret service were throughout the crowd and the word was that the first people who stopping clapping would be flogged or shot. Certainly sharpened their focus...

I guess Comey was the first to stop clapping


An good interview on the Son-in-Law and the screwing of the poor. These guys are psychotic. Real psychos.

 

[wayneL]

The new terrorists - lefists

Dreaming of jailing and blowing up ideological opponents, now shooting them... fomented by a Trump hating media and their unthinking minions.

 

[moXJO]

The new terrorists - lefists

Dreaming of jailing and blowing up ideological opponents, now shooting them... fomented by a Trump hating media and their unthinking minions.

The divide in the US is mental. Democrats divorcing their republican spouses has to be the most stupid thing I heard.
The hate is thick on twitter accounts and facebook on guys like michael moore. I don't think australia is far behind either.

 

[Tisme]

The divide in the US is mental. Democrats divorcing their republican spouses has to be the most stupid thing I heard.
The hate is thick on twitter accounts and facebook on guys like michael moore. I don't think australia is far behind either.

I think Oz is out in front, ever since Abbott and his cronies injected spit and vitriol into Canberra. The upsetting component is the eagerness of the public to fawn over such people, just because of a brand . One of the early casualties was traditional party horse trading and thus the legislation impasses.


My litmus test of politicians is whether they meet the civility criteria my Grandma would insist on within the home.

 

[SirRumpole]

My litmus test of politicians is whether they meet the civility criteria my Grandma would insist on within the home.

Turnbull gave a disgusting and insulting dismissal in QT of Shorten's offer to work together on the Finkel report.

Turnbull is as much a class warrior as Abbott is, policy doesn't matter, ridiculing the Opposition and winning is the only important thing to him.

You were absolutely right about him Tisme, he's a wa***er.

 

[Tink]

You are entitled to your view, Tisme.

imv, what I see is the same 'hate' directed at Trump, as they did to Abbott.

 

[Tisme]

You are entitled to your view, Tisme.

imv, what I see is the same 'hate' directed at Trump, as they did to Abbott.

Not arguing that Tink, but Tony did set the bar low, that is undeniable no matter what ribbons you wear. My opinions are predicated on the cut of the wearer's suit, not on the tailor .....hard for those who can't break away from the chains that bind.

 

[Tisme]

Turnbull gave a disgusting and insulting dismissal in QT of Shorten's offer to work together on the Finkel report.

Turnbull is as much a class warrior as Abbott is, policy doesn't matter, ridiculing the Opposition and winning is the only important thing to him.

You were absolutely right about him Tisme, he's a wa***er.

It's been one the few things of worth we have disagreed on for the long time we have been upsetting the hackneyed voting public..... rather gratifying in a way that up and down can agree while left and right bicker and sook.

I do feel for you on this Rumpole because you have advocated for him so long and I admit it is unedifying watching him sink to the gutter politics he has half heartedly accused the opposition of.

 

[basilio]

So a couple of days after El Presidente crows that he wasn't being personally investigated the Special Counsel investigating the alleged Russian interference in the last election is going to look at allegations Trump was trying to obstruct justice.

Also turns out that some Republicans are wanting to dismiss the Special Counsell Robert Mueller. Check out John McCains response to that idea.

Special Counsel investigating Russian interference in US election will now examine President Trump
June 15, 201710:44am

• Video
• Image

Play
0:03
/
0:31

Fullscreen
Autoplay

Resident says Grenfell Tower Fire was "no accident"

Staff writers, agenciesNews Corp Australia Network
THE Special Counsel investigating Russia’s interference in the US election has widened his probe to include allegations President Trump attempted to obstruct justice.

In a pivotal shift in the investigation that has riveted Americans like no other for decades, senior intelligence officials have agreed to be interviewed by investigators working for the special counsel, Robert Mueller, the Post said.

It quoted five people briefed on the requests and said those who have agreed to be interviewed are Daniel Coats, the director of national intelligence, Admiral Mike Rogers, head of the National Security Agency, and his recently departed deputy, Richard Ledgett.

The interviews could come as early as this week, the Post said. The newspaper’s story was met with a furious reaction from Trump’s personal lawyer.

The shift toward investigating the US president began days after Trump fired James Comey as FBI director on May 9, the Post said.
http://www.news.com.au/world/specia... blaze: ‘They were warned’&itmt=1497488723087

 

[luutzu]

I think Oz is out in front, ever since Abbott and his cronies injected spit and vitriol into Canberra. The upsetting component is the eagerness of the public to fawn over such people, just because of a brand . One of the early casualties was traditional party horse trading and thus the legislation impasses.


My litmus test of politicians is whether they meet the civility criteria my Grandma would insist on within the home.

Weren't your grandma one for Imperial overreach and all that civilising business?

 

[McLovin]

I think Oz is out in front, ever since Abbott and his cronies injected spit and vitriol into Canberra. The upsetting component is the eagerness of the public to fawn over such people, just because of a brand . One of the early casualties was traditional party horse trading and thus the legislation impasses.


My litmus test of politicians is whether they meet the civility criteria my Grandma would insist on within the home.

Abbott is a grub who dragged Australian politics down to the base level of American politics. The current inability for anything to get done in Canberra is, in no small part, his legacy. Shorten isn't smart enough to come up with that idea on his own.

 

[explod]

So a couple of days after El Presidente crows that he wasn't being personally investigated the Special Counsel investigating the alleged Russian interference in the last election is going to look at allegations Trump was trying to obstruct justice.

Also turns out that some Republicans are wanting to dismiss the Special Counsell Robert Mueller. Check out John McCains response to that idea.

Special Counsel investigating Russian interference in US election will now examine President Trump
June 15, 201710:44am

• Video
• Image

Play
0:03
/
0:31

Fullscreen
Autoplay

Resident says Grenfell Tower Fire was "no accident"

Staff writers, agenciesNews Corp Australia Network
THE Special Counsel investigating Russia’s interference in the US election has widened his probe to include allegations President Trump attempted to obstruct justice.

In a pivotal shift in the investigation that has riveted Americans like no other for decades, senior intelligence officials have agreed to be interviewed by investigators working for the special counsel, Robert Mueller, the Post said.

It quoted five people briefed on the requests and said those who have agreed to be interviewed are Daniel Coats, the director of national intelligence, Admiral Mike Rogers, head of the National Security Agency, and his recently departed deputy, Richard Ledgett.

The interviews could come as early as this week, the Post said. The newspaper’s story was met with a furious reaction from Trump’s personal lawyer.

The shift toward investigating the US president began days after Trump fired James Comey as FBI director on May 9, the Post said.
http://www.news.com.au/world/special-counsel-investigating-russian-interference-in-us-election-will-now-examine-president-trump/news-story/4cc96000efa13efdd2829098f541dc9d#itm=newscomau|news|right-now-in-|1|It just got real for Donald Trump|story|London blaze: ‘They were warned’&itmt=1497488723087

Absolutely no one touches the FBI, particularly the head. J Edgar HOOVER proved that in his control of 7 Presidents.

Russia as enemy is just a guise for the US to control resources and monopoly on arms production. But for sacking the FBI head Trump is finished.

In my humble opinion of course; and as usual.

 

[basilio]

Another day another court case for El Presidente. (They have to get these in before all the Courts are abolished and the Judges interned because of the "grave dangers facing our great nation")
So 196 Democrats in Congress are suing the Thief-in-Chief for treating the Presidency as a golden opportunity to enrich is his family and the international Trump Empire. Clearly a total failure to properly understand the basic laws of politics and business in America.

Which of course everybody knows.

Trump sued by 200 Democratic lawmakers over foreign payments
Senators and representatives say money flowing into president’s business empire violates emoluments clause of constitution
Associated Press in Washington

Wednesday 14 June 2017 19.31 AEST

Almost 200 Democratic lawmakers are suing Donald Trump over foreign money flowing into his global business empire.

The senators and representatives are plaintiffs in a lawsuit alleging Trump is violating the emoluments clause of the constitution. It is being filed early on Wednesday in the US district court for the District of Columbia, the lawmakers said.

The plaintiffs argue they have standing to sue because the clause says only Congress may approve foreign gifts and payments.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...ic-lawmakers-foreign-payments-business-empire

 

[Tink]

imv, Tisme.

Trump received a republican majority.
Abbott received a liberal majority.

This was about republicans being shot at while they were training at baseball.

 

[Logique]

Whatever 'The Donald's' faults - at least he isn't Hillary!

'The Donald' and 'The Vladimir' in their worst moments, could not approach the Machiavellian malignancy of 'The Hillary'. And the excerpt under was written by a good woman, Miranda Devine (my bolds):

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/re...n/news-story/76870dcfadd6b22156096bed6d98343b
...Hillary Clinton was a terrible candidate: secretive, entitled, unpleasant, you name it. Her recklessness in using a private server for classified State Department documents and the sloppiness of her campaign which made her emails vulnerable to hacking, whether or not it was by Russia.

She couldn’t articulate why she was running for President other than because she was a woman and it was her turn.

Her strategy was to dehumanise Trump and his voters as a “basket of deplorables” - “racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic”, as she told an LGBTQI fundraiser in New York during the campaign.

Trump’s unlikely victory was a repudiation of Clinton personally and more generally of the left’s entire bankrupt project of identity politics.

That’s why they will do anything to overturn the result.

 

[SirRumpole]

'The Donald' and 'The Vladimir' in their worst moments, could not approach the Machiavellian malignancy of 'The Hillary'.

With due respect to yourself, you must be joking.

Comparing Clinton, warts an all, to that pair of disgusting psychopathic tyrants is ridiculous.

 

[wayneL]

Logique is spot on, you lot are just deceived by the the complicity of the media narrative

 

[wayneL]

Bas, I totally agree, but the irony is that it is people like yourself that facilitate the toxicity of the political scene. Have a look at your own posts man!