Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Where is/can Donald Trump take US (sic)?

Status
Not open for further replies.
The foresight of a Trump supporter. :cat:

When Helen Beristain told her husband she was voting for Donald Trump last year, he warned her that the Republican nominee planned to “get rid of the Mexicans.”

Defending her vote, Helen quoted Trump directly, noting that the tough-talking Republican said he would only kick the “bad hombres” out of the country, according to the South Bend Tribune.

Months later, Roberto Beristain — a successful businessman, respected member of his Indiana town and father of three American-born children — languishes in a detention facility with hardened criminals as he awaits his deportation back to Mexico, the country he left in 1998 when he entered the United States illegally.

“I wish I didn’t vote at all,” Helen Beristain told the Tribune. “I did it for the economy. We needed a change.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...r-law-abiding-husband/?utm_term=.7aa487b1e282
 
Donald the Gropers past is still alive and kicking. One of the women who he accused of lying about his sexual assault on her is proceeding with a defamation case. His lawyers are trying to say he is immune from prosecution..

There is an excellent video clip in the story of 11 women who cite their experiences of being assaulted by the Groper in Chief.

Trump lawyers: president is immune from Apprentice contestant's lawsuit
Lawyers say defamation suit brought by former contestant Summer Zervos should be barred as it may distract the president from performing his duties

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...it-summer-zervos-apprentice-sexual-harassment
 


That is a mean, scary story. That guy had to be one of the cleanest, most productive examples of an immigrant you could find. And he is being deported, his family destroyed and probably bankrupted, his business finished , his employees out of a job. So much for deporting the "bad guys"

This is the Piece of xxxx his wife voted for in November.
 
Donald the Gropers past is still alive and kicking. One of the women who he accused of lying about his sexual assault on her is proceeding with a defamation case. His lawyers are trying to say he is immune from prosecution..

There is an excellent video clip in the story of 11 women who cite their experiences of being assaulted by the Groper in Chief.

Trump lawyers: president is immune from Apprentice contestant's lawsuit
Lawyers say defamation suit brought by former contestant Summer Zervos should be barred as it may distract the president from performing his duties

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...it-summer-zervos-apprentice-sexual-harassment
OFF TOPIC.
I believe Bill Clinton did the same thing and nothing was said except the Monica Lowinski affair.
 
OFF TOPIC.
I believe Bill Clinton did the same thing and nothing was said except the Monica Lowinski affair.
You can believe what you like Noco but it rarely matches up with the truth.

What makes this story well and truly on topic.

1) Character. It isn't the fact that Trump is womaniser. It is his abuse of power and position to assault any woman he wants. This is what he said in his infamous interview
2) He is a serial abuser . After the interview came out scores of additional women gave examples of Donald Trump assaulting them in various situations. Eleven of those woman chose to take part in an action to bring Donald Trump to account.
3) He lies and lies and lies. When the original case was brought up Trump just said all of these statements were fictitious, made up. That each and every one of the complainants was a liar. Well at least one of the complaints has decided this in itself is a libel and is demanding a withdrawal of Trumps statement that she was lying. In effect acknowledging the truth of the complaint.
 
Interesting how the far right, Fox, Alex Jones etc. always scream about how corrupt Obama and the Clintons are. There allegations are not borne out by facts. I presume in all cases the prison sentences were commuted .....

C74nrfCW0AAEWrB.jpg
 
You can believe what you like Noco but it rarely matches up with the truth.

What makes this story well and truly on topic.

1) Character. It isn't the fact that Trump is womaniser. It is his abuse of power and position to assault any woman he wants. This is what he said in his infamous interview
2) He is a serial abuser . After the interview came out scores of additional women gave examples of Donald Trump assaulting them in various situations. Eleven of those woman chose to take part in an action to bring Donald Trump to account.
3) He lies and lies and lies. When the original case was brought up Trump just said all of these statements were fictitious, made up. That each and every one of the complainants was a liar. Well at least one of the complaints has decided this in itself is a libel and is demanding a withdrawal of Trumps statement that she was lying. In effect acknowledging the truth of the complaint.

Just more Trump bashing by the socialist left.....What ever it takes to discredit the man....And your link of course in on the way.
 
Joe Hockey, our ambassador to the USA, is pleading for those Trump bashers in both the USA and Australia to ease up a bit.....Give the man a fair go in the true Australian tradition.

http://www.couriermail.com.au/busin...n/news-story/d3fffe9d93f98163a74fa6e8708ccf08

We're stuck with him for four years and what he does is irrelevant unless it affects us, and there is no point in our politicians or media sticking the boot in, so yes let's just sit back and see what happens for a while.
 
A good summary of Trump's first 75 days.

Scary when it's summed up like this.

 
A good summary of Trump's first 75 days.

Scary when it's summed up like this.



I checked out Noam Chomsky on google and after reading many of his articles, I am convinced he is a rusted on Democrat who is out to discredit Trump whenever he can...What else would you expect.......He is comparable to our ABC in trying damage One Nation.
 
I checked out Noam Chomsky on google and after reading many of his articles, I am convinced he is a rusted on Democrat who is out to discredit Trump whenever he can...What else would you expect.......He is comparable to our ABC in trying damage One Nation.

He's too smart and honest a man to play partisan politics noco. You should read or watch his thousands of lectures and hundreds of books and essays.. see how he's one of the very few honest scholar and activist around.

He was quite a distinguished professor of Linguistic, breaking new grounds in the field and getting tenure in his 30s at Harvard. Then got politically active against the Vietnam War, and I think, fought in US Civil Rights movement.

As you might be aware, it was JFK, a Democrat, then LBJ, another Democrat, that got the VN War started. Chomsky was against that butchering of innocent people "to stop Communism" and almost went to prison for his hippy dippy activism.

I think he did praise Trump for wanting to ease tension with Russia. Contrast that to the Democrats and its media outlet all hammering Trump for being a Russian stooge.

Know who damage One Nation and all other "patriotic" parties around the world? Donald J Trump.

He didn't mean to, but it seem that voters in Australia and in Europe watch in horror the kind of crap a nutjob like Trump is doing... decides it's best not to play with that kind of stuff. Hence, One Nation didn't win in WA and will lose more seats in any upcoming election. Same with France, the Dutch etc.
 
Chomskey is a leftist and a sophist, 'nuff said.
 
I checked out Noam Chomsky on google and after reading many of his articles, I am convinced he is a rusted on Democrat who is out to discredit Trump whenever he can...What else would you expect.......He is comparable to our ABC in trying damage One Nation.
The stupid thing about your comment is that you actually (not realising it of course) agree with his views on freedom of speech. Also with your views about "Fabian media control" you are also agreeing with his views on how he believes political groups use the media to manufacture consent and for silencing/marginalising contrary viewpoints.

It just goes to show, if you read something (I'll just believe you read it because it's easier) with the purpose of disagreeing it you will actually miss some or a lot of the actual content.
 
Chomskey is a leftist and a sophist, 'nuff said.

He's a modern day Machiavelli.

i.e. he doesn't buy bs. He actually study and analyse history and politics. Tell it how it is.

Only difference between Chomsky and a Machiavelli is that Chomsky chose not to serve a prince; but chose to serve the people, the public, with his knowledge.

If that makes him a "leftist", OK. To most, that just make him a decent human being. You know, caring for other people.

And no, the man have no sophistry in him. I've listen to quite a few of his lectures. They're all fact-based, stated with some sarcasm now and then, some humour, but none of the theatrics like Obama or JFK or even a Martin Luther King Jr.
 
He's a modern day Machiavelli.
A Narcissist, a Psychopath and a Machiavellian Walk into a Bar.

The bartender asks, ‘who has the darkest personality out of you three?’ The Narcissist says ‘me’, the Psychopath says, ‘I don’t care’ and the Mach says ‘it’s whoever I want it to be’.
 
See above. Most likely applies to you as well.
Nup, and you wouldn't say that if you understood most of my points.

And as much as I may agree with many of his points, Chomsky simply must be recognised as such.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top