- Joined
- 15 November 2006
- Posts
- 1,206
- Reactions
- 680
A country thrives or fails based mainly on its economy, doesn't it? Why wouldn't a hard-nosed businessman be a perfect fit? If Bill Gates was considerate, respectful and gentle person, MS wouldn't be where it is today. Trump's personality is grating, but does have a chance at creating actual change. No one else did, or does. Pollies nowadays are so afraid of disapproval, their whole lives revolve around not upsetting the perpetually outraged Twitterati.
People say he's only interested in building his own wealth. I don't believe that, given the 10's of millions of his own money spent on campaigning, and his advancing age. He is hell bent on being the American savior - which isn't a good idea - but that's his aim, I believe. There's altruism there (or is it a drive to be the hero? not sure). Most of the electorate can't see beyond the end of the week, so long term planning always looks like a bad thing. Sacrifice for the greater long term good means nothing to most people, especially youth.
International relations are of little concern for a protectionist. He is looking at his own country's problems, which I find most appropriate. Why try to suck up to Australia and other counties when your own country is a complete mess? We are free to do the same if only we had strong leaders.
Trump has obvious downsides too, which I'm well aware of. It might not sound like it here, but I'm actually quite ambivalent about him.
The problem is that it's very easy to make a pro-Trump narrative along the lines of Trump took action and the Establishment / political elites are blocking it like they normally do.The US Appeals Court has voted unanimously to uphold the suspension of Donald Trump's travel ban.
Another blow to his credibility.
The problem is that it's very easy to make a pro-Trump narrative along the lines of Trump took action and the Establishment / political elites are blocking it like they normally do.
I agree, but again, they do until they do not.Yes you are right, but fortunately in the US and other democracies judges don't have to worry about electoral popularity and can just do their job impartially.
Separation of powers and all that.
In other words, laws or social customs only exist in their current state until enough people say they do not or the underlying accepted reality is changed by some other cause.
True, but I wonder if the Trump phenomena will last given that a lot of the media hate him and the Congressional Republicans resent the way he hijacked their party.
I think he has a limited scope for mistakes before the Republicans impeach him for conflict of interest and put a more conventional Republican back in charge.
Plus I think more voters are realising that he's not the real deal he said he was. He's going to have a hard time keeping up the veneer of a capitalist revolutionary.
This is possible, but strictly speaking, it is also not about Trump. If Trump did not exist America would have created him. If Trump goes, then I assume, unless something in the underlying collective thinking of the American public changes, then he will just be replaced by something else.At some point people will get sick of the 'fame fair ride.' Trump is entertaining the herd for the moment but people get board and will want to change the channel. Then his tweets will be despised and everyone will be wanting to bring him down like they do even with the best of celebs.
With Trump it will be particularly brutal!
I find it interesting the confidence trick of getting all business CEO's together. He is a business man and obvious expert at getting people to loosen their purse strings.Trump is entertaining the herd for the moment but people get board and will want to change the channel.
Trump going does not change the anxieties that those who voted for him have for the 'Establishment.'
I agree with this.I wonder how many people voted for Trump as opposed to voted against Hilary. I have a few friends who are lifelong GOP voters and they've all said they would have voted for Biden and pretty much despise Trump, but they would never have voted for Hilary. In the end, 25% of eligible voters voted for Trump and 75% did not. It would probably do Trump well to remember that he has to govern for everyone, not just the minority who voted for him.
True, but I wonder if the Trump phenomena will last given that a lot of the media hate him and the Congressional Republicans resent the way he hijacked their party.
I think he has a limited scope for mistakes before the Republicans impeach him for conflict of interest and put a more conventional Republican back in charge.
Plus I think more voters are realising that he's not the real deal he said he was. He's going to have a hard time keeping up the veneer of a capitalist revolutionary.
I wonder how many people voted for Trump as opposed to voted against Hilary. I have a few friends who are lifelong GOP voters and they've all said they would have voted for Biden and pretty much despise Trump, but they would never have voted for Hilary. In the end, 25% of eligible voters voted for Trump and 75% did not. It would probably do Trump well to remember that he has to govern for everyone, not just the minority who voted for him.
Rumpy, you are starting to sound like a cracked record......Impeach..Impeach...Impeach.
$5 Trump will be impeached or forced to resign within his first term.
I am not a gambler...A gambler never gets rich....They generally lose the lot in the end.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?