- Joined
- 21 April 2014
- Posts
- 7,956
- Reactions
- 1,072
Of course it will. It's a tax on US consumers. Who do you think will be the first to complain about the rising cost of products? The prez has pretty limited scope to raise taxes without congressional approval, so I'd put it more in the sabre rattling column at the moment.
Maybe Mexico could lease some land to China for a military base along the border to recoup some of the money they miss out on.
Maybe Mexico could lease some land to China for a military base along the border to recoup some of the money they miss out on.
Not as silly as it sounds. They may take some hints from the Philippines . There could be another Bay of Pigs fiasco.
Please explain.
Maybe Mexico could lease some land to China for a military base along the border to recoup some of the money they miss out on.
President Duterte seems to be aligning himself with China, although that was when Obama criticised him for shooting drug dealers.
Trump may have a different view.
https://www.rt.com/news/369956-duterte-china-philippines-arms/
the United States is a federation, Horace . The president is not selected via a popular vote and the system was designed specifically to prevent the more populus States dominating via their greater numbers. Therefore it is not BS, and as intended. the college system work absolutely perfectlyThe college system is BS. Clinton won the popular vote.
the United States is a federation, Horace . The president is not selected via a popular vote and the system was designed specifically to prevent the more populus States dominating via their greater numbers. Therefore it is not BS, and as intended. the college system work absolutely perfectly
Speaking to a few friends from US the other night... they remain convinced that Trump can't afford to build the wall without using illegal immigrants.
I suppose he could order the wall be built by illegal labourers and simply have them paint the Mexican side of the wall at the end of it.
Rubbish, Grasshopper.That's the populous anti-populous argument. Doesn't make much sense once you think about it though Sifu, not from a democratic point of view.
First, in a democracy, the majority ought to have their say, no? All votes are equal and what not.
Second, this electoral college rule was design not to protect the interests of the people of the less populous state as is claimed, but was designed so that slave-owning states, having agreed that slaves are 2/3rd human and other non-White Male are not citizens... well, they too ought to have two Senators etc. etc.
The thing I like about a Democracy as we know it today is that when the populous are sick of one party, whoever happen to be their current leader get to be scapegoated, booed and shipped off to some nice retirement village. Then the population are told that it was all the other side's fault and so get to pick the same alternative.
Then the "new" alternative do the same bs, screw the population to serve their own class (or if they happen to be from new money or no-money come good, serve their masters)... then once the plebs get upset at being screwed again... new ads, new elections and it repeats.
It's a great system, the kind wise (and wiley) kings and emperors play when they pick some idiot with a big ego, give him a grand title then set him about doing what's needed to be done. Then of course you chop his head off if the population become angry enough.
So it's not new... and as history have repeatedly shown, it can only last so long until the ruling elite run out of idiots convincing enough to play the lead role.
So now we have a new dirty word in politics: Populous.
When a politician do what is popular in a democracy, they're label a "populous" i.e. sneeky little unprincipled liar doing what the population want.
Not only is that wrong - i.e. how many politician do we know who truly do what the majority of the people want anyway. And wrong in that the kind of stuff they're proposing aren't at all what the population want - it's just sold that way, made to appear that way.
Let's take "free trade".
If trade is truly free, if the market are level and consumers are given free choice from well informed and equally competitive suppliers... who wouldn't want free trade?
Anyway...
Rubbish, Grasshopper.
It's not an argument, it's the constitution.
Our system is not dissimilar where all sorts of situations can occur where the the popularly voted for candidate loses a seat, or a party loses an election. Think about it.
It's a system with a reason, it worked as intended, the left should stop squealing, protesting, smashing peoples cars and shop windows, putting up torturers and murders as representatitives of the "womens movement".
The celebrity cabal should also STFU and stop proving what morons they are. I now have a long list of "artists" whom I can no longer enjoy.
The left should grow up, stop with the faux offense and enter into discussion and debate... and stop behaving like infants
I for one hope Trump serves as catalyst for the de-gradualism of the poisonous gradualist brain washing and social engineering, the awakening of critical thought and escewing of the pathological "virtuenza" that is plaguing the West and handing economic (and eventually military) hegemony to the Far East.
I for one hope Trump serves as catalyst for the de-gradualism of the poisonous gradualist brain washing and social engineering, the awakening of critical thought and escewing of the pathological "virtuenza" that is plaguing the West and handing economic (and eventually military) hegemony to the Far East.
Speaking to a few friends from US the other night... they remain convinced that Trump can't afford to build the wall without using illegal immigrants.
I suppose he could order the wall be built by illegal labourers and simply have them paint the Mexican side of the wall at the end of it.
Specious nonsense. You think there is a bona fide leftist movement? Let me tell you, there is a massive movement on the the other side. You just don't know it's there because of the echo chamber that is the media, the arts and the bureaucracy.
Middle America is very ####ing angry, and they are ready for civil war, believe me on that one. Trump embodies that anger and though he will most l likely not be truly representative of them,
You watch, if as the left prophesized (and even implored in some cases), Trump coos a bullet to the head, the poo will really hit the propeller.
I for one hope Trump serves as catalyst for the de-gradualism of the poisonous gradualist brain washing and social engineering, the awakening of critical thought and escewing of the pathological "virtuenza" that is plaguing the West and handing economic (and eventually military) hegemony to the Far East.
This is the panic evident in the socialists, that people are staying to wake up.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?