- Joined
- 26 March 2014
- Posts
- 20,817
- Reactions
- 13,858
Why was he a good Christian man in your opinion?
Why was he a good Christian man in your opinion?Yes, the cult is cheering the death of a good Christian man who would break bread with anyone, for real.
Did you deliberately miss the part where I said he would 'break bread with anyone'?Why was he a good Christian man in your opinion?
Not transgender people apparently, but I suppose they don't really count.Charlie was more than just a Political Activist, he was also a quiet evangelist who created strong friendships with people of all different lifestyles and beliefs.
Can you see where you failed? You just made a claim that you cannot verify.Not transgender people apparently, but I suppose they don't really count.
1.Thanks for the wrap up, but what’s you point? Are you trying to say I don’t have a right to think Charlie Kirk wasn’t a good person? Because I have already said many times he didn’t deserve to be shot, and I don’t think you are stupid enough or dishonest enough to keep arguing that point, so what is your point?1. Sum of his beliefs is that its a human from conception. You are either for the killing of babies or not.
So while his opinion may offend you, yours also offends many. I had a mate who had a similar opinion on rape and carrying and looking after the child as it wasn't the child's fault. I couldn't get my head around it, but came to accept difference in opinion. He wasn't religious either. Better man than I.
You don't actually have the "gist" as you fed people a false narrative of what he believed through TikTok airheads that have no concept of context. I doubt you could find anything but edited short grabs.
Thats what I have a problem with-misinformation.
Yes, the cult is cheering the death of a good Christian man who would break bread with anyone, for real.
Even many Christian’s don’t believe he was good, listen to this short talks, even me as an atheist with say “Amen” to this preacher
Can you see where you failed? You just made a claim that you cannot verify.
Yes. I have flaw of easily forgiving people.Well, we will see if Charlie Kirk's supporters are Christian enough to forgive his killer.
Are you?
Haters are gonna hate. Insubstantial political rhetoric.Even many Christian’s don’t believe he was good, listen to this short talks, even me as an atheist with say “Amen” to this preacher
Who is the hater? Charlie Kirk? or the Christian Preacher?Haters are gonna hate. Insubstantial political rhetoric.
Confirmation bias is awesome!
Really, I don't know what social media algorithm you are on, but I haven't heard many people expressing those feeling at all. The genuine feeling I see is that people are appalled by the violence, but also don't agree we should be celebrating him and trying to make him in to a martyr / hero, when they feel in life he was actually a pretty dodgy character.It certainly seems that many feel that actual assasination is ok,
Where are the terrible opinions?no of that changes Charlie's opinions though, which as said were terrible. I already said he didn't deserve to be shot, regardless of who the shooter is.
1. I think good people can be biased and say stupid things in the moment. Often what they mean can be taken out of context or its part of a broader discussion. That in no way means that things he said might not have been provocative for social media hits.1.Thanks for the wrap up, but what’s you point? Are you trying to say I don’t have a right to think Charlie Kirk wasn’t a good person? Because I have already said many times he didn’t deserve to be shot, and I don’t think you are stupid enough or dishonest enough to keep arguing that point, so what is your point?
2. I haven’t given anyone a false Narrative, I have watched hours of Charlie Kirk’s debates directly from his own channels, you haven’t? You are just assuming he is being taken out of context, he isn’t though. Which leads me to think that you don’t actually think he is a good person based on those quotes. So to rationalise it in your head you assume he is misquoted
Howard John-Wesley made hateful assertions without evidence not arguments hence insubstantial political rhetoric i.e. he hasn't got a leg to stand on.You guys seem to think anyone that doesn't agree with Charlie Kirk is some kind of Hater or "Lib Tard", I don't get it. Surely you could understand that many people would have genuine valid concerns about many of the things he said.
Why not, there is no evidence throughout history that going through with the pregnancy has been a significant problem. Like all suffering humans can overcome it in the right circumstances.I don't even actually think Charlie Kirk himself believed a lot of the things he said, I don't actually think he would allow his 10 year old daughter be forced to go through a pregnancy with her rapists child, but he said he would, you should be able to understand that people who hear that would rightly say he is crazy and not a great guy.
Where are the terrible opinions?
Only for those who deal in extremist thinking perhaps. Most free thinking people want context.
This
1. I think good people can be biased and say stupid things in the moment. Often what they mean can be taken out of context or its part of a broader discussion. That in no way means that things he said might not have been provocative for social media hits.
2. Im more worried about how they lived their lives and treated those around them. Often these personalities are cultivated to get hits from particular demographics. My personal like/dislike doesn't need to be a factor here.
3. However I don't think I've seen anything he said that was a personal statement (as of yet) that would make me think he was over the top in what he said. Seemed pretty vanilla if anything.
1. Howard John-Wesley made hateful assertions without evidence not arguments hence insubstantial political rhetoric i.e. he hasn't got a leg to stand on.
2. Why not, there is no evidence throughout history that going through with the pregnancy has been a significant problem. Like all suffering humans can overcome it in the right circumstances.
3. You seem to be conflating your one single issue with a collective 'he is not a great guy'.
I've watched it over the years and more over the last few days.Well if you are ok with a 10 year old that was raped being forced to keep the baby, I guess thats fine but I think its terrible.
1. You admitted you haven't even seen much of his stuff, I have seen hours of the stuff he posted. I think I am know what was in content and not better than you at this point. But the fact you think it must be out of context is an admission you think its bad.
2. You don't know anything about that side of his life either.
3. HAHAHA, any way I think I have wasted enough time wading around in your mud pit, you need to educate yourself before you speak.
show us all how his statement that a 10 yearly should be made to keep her rapists baby was taken out of context then, don't try and cloud the issue, just go and look up that debate and put it in context for us. until you you do that, you showing yourself as just being silly, so I am out of this convo now, unless you can back up these repeated claims that he is taken out of context.I keep hearing about how much "hatred" the guy had but the quotes seem to be taken out of context and its all brainwashed bs. If I ask for examples its pretty vague.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?