- Joined
- 12 January 2008
- Posts
- 7,638
- Reactions
- 19,229
EOD Trading update:
All trades survived. No sells triggered. The portfolio lost ~1%, nothing to be concerned about.
We have ~$1848 to use as margin in a cfd trade if one triggers. After today's dip there are plenty of potential setups.
Homework: Have a think about today's discussion in relation to your trading plans. Consider adding a re-entry guideline to them.
Any questions, post them in. IMO after about 3 months* of this thread you should be able to start your own portfolios trading in your own way (short, medium and longer term styles) and be comfortable doing it.
I sold to reduce the portfolio heat for the benefit of the longer term performance of the portfolio.
I actually also have API and NAN in my portfolio. My system picked these up in scans but I haven't sold out yet. I was surprised when you mentioned that you wanted to exit API at the time and was contemplating exiting NAN to lock in profits. This leads me to asking this question - do you back test your exit criteria with your system? More specifically - the manual exits.
With my trading, I am quite strict when it comes to breaking the rules and going against what my system is telling me. I'm currently learning and trying to apply VSA in case studies and hopefully this will allow me to code this into my system so I can test its performance.
Kind of off topic here but I'm beginning to see the stock market/futures as a game of probability vs manipulation (trading system vs VSA).
A few new ones that could be considered:
ABX
HIG
RTR
I haven't time to do the analysis but thought I would flag them for those that do. These set ups are higher risk than if we were to go with the continuation breakout entry strategy.
I don't want to turn this into a stock picking competition but I do have the urge to comment
No disrespect or criticism of your picks Nortorious as they are breakouts etc but those types of stocks are ones that can make you money quickly but on average over a longer period my experience has been that they can cost you dearly too.
ABX may be worth a look but the other two would be dodgy imo.
Not wanting to enter into a "mine is bigger than yours" discussion especially on this thread, this post is probably borderline anyway but compare these three as an example of what I am going on about.
AIA
SGT
TTS
(PS - I haven't looked at any of the usual factors associated with these such as ex div, depth etc., I am just picking the pattern only as an initial example)
My way of looking at those in comparison is that they have a consistent pattern and substance for the want of a better description (and they exist in the fundamental upper end of the market).
My way of thinking is that you need more than just a standalone breakout pattern, you also need a resumption or potential repeat of a previous pattern with steady reasonably predictable movement in both directions where you can be almost certain that your stops will have minimum slippage should you be wrong.
I may be wrong but over the years I have shifted away from the quick hit type breakouts to a more steady style of breakout and the results are enough proof that it works for me.
Sorry to derail the thread slightly, just adding my
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?