Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Gold Mining Stocks

I don’t seem to have the bottle for trading gold miners nor silver miners for that matter.
your probably being too harsh on yourself bloke
Gold itself I enjoy and have some quite healthy big punts but not the miners.
it will come should you decide to have a better chop at it
I bought GDX GDXJ a little while ago and it fell and fell and then slowly crawled up again in to a profit last night. Then gold had a small sharp retracement and I sold the miners. Quite happy to let the gold fall a bit and hold on.
Stocks, commodities prices go up and go down... picking the right entry and sale opportunity can be quite frustrating...
What am I doing wrong Dear Abby. Also I think my husband is having an affair with the Sumo wrestler in number 43.
whats good for the goose is good for the gander ... :)

Kind regards
rcw1
 
Gold p/fs rocked hard today but I feel a preternatural* calmness.
I think RMS for instance fell 11% intraday but most of them are clawing back a little ground by luncheon.
Main point is though, at this point at least, looking at longer term weekly charts, this pullback looks normal!
Obviously I could be wrong - there have been occasions.

Held
and fricken Holding

*preternatural
adjective
beyond what is normal or natural.
"autumn had arrived with preternatural speed"
 
Last edited:
From Market Index. Gold miners good over 1 year, not that good today.

I think I'll stick to Gold. I've never been able to pick a reasonable entry on miners.

View attachment 199360

gg

Some of those p/e s are mad. Like bank stocks 10 years ago.

I don't think they will be able to help themselves and start spending up big in M&A in the next 2 years.
 
Some of those p/e s are mad. Like bank stocks 10 years ago.

I don't think they will be able to help themselves and start spending up big in M&A in the next 2 years.
I must admit I looked as carefully at the p/e's as the % yearly gains. They are doing the yankee p/e ... looking too far forward discounting cyclones, fall in POG and idiot cousin being made CFO. It should be called pfe or p / effin /e .

gg
 
Email from TheDailyGold this evening:

TheDailyGold: Bull Market Gains Just Getting Started for Gold & Silver

"The gold stocks are breaking out against Gold.
The silver stocks are breaking out against Silver.
This is the sweet spot of a cyclical bull market in precious metals.
But we have to be in the right companies to truly capitalize."

"Gold Stocks are Breaking Out Against Gold

Last week, GOEX broke-out against Gold while GDXJ broke out against Gold by a hair. GDX? Not yet.

But a few days later, GDX has broken out against Gold and GOEX and GDXJ have confirmed and extended their breakouts.

The miners are leading and outperforming the metals."

Screenshot_20250604_205906_Chrome.jpg
 
For those who like to invest in gold stocks, a potential change in rthe VAN Eck Indes fund, GDX , may have a sgnificant affect on indivdual gold stocks.
Being the largest ETF by far, this fund can be a mover, and others follow the index for their own benefit.
VAN Ecks ETF Changes lsts the changes.
There are some that will be removed entirely (Oz shars WAF, GMD, CMM, RRL, GOR, RMS, EMR, VAU, RSG, and BGL are all out).
Heres a sample of the proposed changes.
1749534542649.png
 
hmmm i hold GOR ( liable to be taken-over , i heard ) RRL , RMS , and NST and EVN ( both 'free-carried' )

RMS and RRL would have to drop at least 50% ( on current prices to tempt me to add ) , and of course NST and EVN would have to drop way move than that
 
hmmm i hold GOR ( liable to be taken-over , i heard ) RRL , RMS , and NST and EVN ( both 'free-carried' )

RMS and RRL would have to drop at least 50% ( on current prices to tempt me to add ) , and of course NST and EVN would have to drop way move than that
I should have added that the other major van Eck ETF zgDSJ which is for the junior or smaller players, has not made any announcements on its changes.
The list below shows all the ASX based shares in the ETF.
All of the shares in the DXJ that were being removed are also in the GDXJ, so perhaps its a cleanup of the index.
Remains to be seen whether the shares are sold or transferred to the GDXJ index.
1749535827425.png
 
I should have added that the other major van Eck ETF GDXJ which is for the junior or smaller players, has not made any announcements on its changes.
The list below shows all the ASX based shares in the ETF.
All of the shares in the DXJ that were being removed are also in the GDXJ, so perhaps its a cleanup of the index.
Remains to be seen whether the shares are sold or transferred to the GDXJ index.
View attachment 201278
Geez, those drugs still messin with my typing. FXJ above should read GDXJ
 
Market Matters this morning
/report/portfolio-positioning-mm-still-says-buy-the-dip-until-further-notice/

"Gold ($US/oz)
Gold retreated again overnight taking ETFs down ~2% in the US, not a bad performance considering the sectors advance over recent years. Gold is following our playbook and consolidating its recent gains, and the question we’re now asking ourselves is whether we’ve already seen the majority of the washout. We are seeking opportunities to increase our gold exposure across the MM portfolios."
 
Market Matters this morning
/report/portfolio-positioning-mm-still-says-buy-the-dip-until-further-notice/

"Gold ($US/oz)
Gold retreated again overnight taking ETFs down ~2% in the US, not a bad performance considering the sectors advance over recent years. Gold is following our playbook and consolidating its recent gains, and the question we’re now asking ourselves is whether we’ve already seen the majority of the washout. We are seeking opportunities to increase our gold exposure across the MM portfolios."
My thoughts exactly this morning on looking at overseas markets and ours on the open. MM highlights two important points.
  • Has the pullback in the POG got further to run?
  • The Gold Price chart shows consolidation.
The 6 mo. chart of gold shows the pattern. Three entry points are visible
  • 3300
  • 3200
  • 3000
The 3000 area technically is the more robust one, clear support and resistance. The difference between being incorrect at the higher is a mere 10%. One should not IMO be investing in gold if one is not expecting a more than 20% gain from present levels, more with mining stocks, to POG $4000.

1750816543486.png

All the best to those investing in gold mining stocks, I may join you should POG start pecking at $3000.

gg
 
I remind of Felix Zulauf's call made two months ago. I keep it in mind to temper my enthusiasm for gold as he's a Swiss heavy hitter. Repeating my comment:
"Back then he was expecting gold to top out of its 'medium term' rally at around $US3,400 and descend over a few months to maybe $US2,600 at which time it should be bought again. Zulauf is long term a gold bull." Gold comment starts 34.48

 
A couple of junior goldies to have a look at. AAR and AUC. I've been watching AUC as Barry had written it up before. He must own it.

Astral:

Astral (AAR) was a $168 million company back in December when the Aussie gold price was more or less $4,000/oz. It is now as $250m company (17c a share).

So the gold price putting on $876/oz since December 31 in Aussie dollar terms has had a rub off effect on the stock.

But the recently released pre-feasibility study into the development of its Mandilla gold project near Kalgoorlie points to more valuation upside still, particularly for true believers in $5,000-plus Aussie gold becoming a lasting thing.

Ausgold (AUC):

Ausgold (AUC) was a $145 million company back in December and now is valued at $268 million (75c a share). So it too has been carried higher on the back of gold’s rise to more than $5,000/oz.

But it is doubtful the gain has matched the capability of Ausgold’s Katanning gold project in wheatbelt country to the south of Perth.

Katanning has been a slow bake since 2010 when Ausgold picked up what was then rated as a 400,000oz resource.

The resource base has since grown to 3Moz of free milling ore. Katanning is also set to become the treatment hub, in time, for the region’s largely untapped gold potential.

 
Market Matters morning report

"Australian miners: From their June highs, the ASX tells a very different story (to the U.S gokd stocks), with Evolution (EVN) correcting 24.5%, Regis Resources (RRL) 23%, and Northern Star (NST) 29%.

With the world’s largest listed gold producer, Newmont, now listed on the ASX following its takeover of local heavyweight Newcrest Mining (NCM), we must question if/why MM should consider the US gold producer over our own after its dramatic outperformance in recent weeks. The story is more balanced across Canadian miners as their performance has been closely related to the underlying gold price, outperforming ASX miners but underperforming their US peers. Hence, to increase our gold exposure across the MM portfolios, we must first ask what’s wrong with the local names? Should we instead be focusing on the US goliath?

We believe the momentum trade unwound locally. Australians love the gold sector, and with talk of ever-higher bullion prices regularly featured in the press, buying of the local sector became almost frenzied. Hence, when any less positive news came out, whether a weaker gold price, an analyst downgrade on valuation concerns, or production issues, the unwind of the crowded positioning was dramatic. The most obvious example being Northern Star (NST), with stock fully priced, and some before hitting a few speed humps:

UBS downgraded EVN to a sell in late June with a $6.70 price target (PT), while yesterday saw Goldman downgrade EVN to a sell with $6.95 PT – a bit late by GS with EVN 20% higher a few weeks ago.
This week, NST sold off on weaker production and downgrades followed across the board: GS PT was $19.50, but most are still way above $20.

We remain bullish on ASX gold miners into further weakness, finding Goldman’s “late” downgrade encouraging overnight. If it drives stocks lower in the coming week, MM is likely to fade the move as we feel the local unwind is maturing fast. We continue to like EVN and Regis Resources around 6-8% lower and plan to increase our Active Growth Portfolios position in EVN on a move nearer $7. At the same time, the more volatile RRL is a candidate for our Emerging Companies Portfolio.

We believe the US gold miners’ outperformance over the ASX names is mature, if not over."
 
Article appeared in the AFR electronic yesterday (10/08/25)

Miners abandon their gold hedges in the hope of bigger windfalls​


Australia’s gold miners have turned their backs on the security of guaranteed sales for their bullion in favour of the spot market, underlining the overwhelmingly bullish sentiment sweeping the sector.

Global trade tensions, regional wars, economic uncertainty and central bank demand have galvanised support for gold, sending the precious metal 40 per cent higher over the past year to more than $5200 per ounce. The average cost for Australian companies to produce an ounce of gold is about $2100, resulting in big margins if miners sell their bullion on the open market.

However, when gold bulls are more scarce, some miners agree to sell some of their future production at guaranteed prices at an agreed date – a form of financial de-risking called hedging. Fewer hedging contracts mean that miners are confident the price will continue to rise, or at least remain high. “The only reason you got a hedge is that you think the gold price is going to go down, and that’s a negative signal to the market,” said Paul Howard, mining analyst at Canaccord Genuity.

Miners presenting last week at the Diggers & Dealers conference, a major resources sector event held in the gold capital of Kalgoorlie, all pointed to a shift away from hedging to take advantage of the buoyant price.

Northern Star Resources, for instance, has axed its mandatory hedging policy, while Westgold Resources managing director Wayne Bramwell has long touted his company’s rejection of forward contracts.

“The company is unhedged. Absolutely nothing. We hedged previously, and that cost us a lot of money. Our view is that our best hedge is to get our costs under control,” said Bramwell. “Most of these gold companies with international shareholders don’t want Australian miners to hedge. They want full exposure to the gold price. When you hedge, you’re taking a view [of the future gold price]. And does anyone really know where the gold price is going? I’ve got zero impact on the external gold price, but I can control our costs.”

Howard said the rejection of hedging suggested that miners were “signalling to the market that they’re gold bulls”.

“They’re signalling to the market: ‘We think this will be sustained for a long time. We don’t want to waste shareholders’ money or lose margin by hedging.”


According to the World Gold Council, hedging in the June quarter was down 7.1 per cent year-on-year, continuing a long-term trend. Global gold production in the quarter remained strong at 1249 tonnes, up 3 per cent.

“Hedging is expected to be minimal as producers opt for exposure to strong prices. A more material drop in prices, which is a possibility … could encourage some producers to lock in prices at the margin,” it said.

1754862523287.png

Duncan Gibbs, managing director of Gold Road Resources, said: “Our philosophy around hedging was to do the minimum necessary. If you are drawing down debt, often it’s required by the banks, particularly if you are taking on higher levels of gearing.” “Gold Road has been unhedged for three or four years now. Hedging is about risk management, not about trying to predict the gold price,” said Gibbs, whose company recently agreed to be taken over by joint venture partner Gold Fields for $3.7 billion.

“Where you get caught is a run-up in the gold price in an inflationary environment. If you’ve locked in the gold price and your cost base is going up, it can squeeze your margins.”


Hedging can backfire if prices and costs move in the wrong direction, while some hedging is required to raise capital.

“Sometimes, it’s not [the company’s] decision to hedge. It’s the banks that are funding the debt for their project. It’s the bank protecting their money, so they put on a mandatory hedge. It guarantees them revenue in a changeable gold environment,” said Canaccord’s Howard.

A notable example is Bellevue Gold, a West Australian-based miner whose long-term hedging was caught out by soaring prices. Bellevue spent the bulk of a $156 million equity raise in April to escape from forward hedging contracts agreed for an average of $US2135 ($3270) per ounce.

Bellevue managing director Darren Stralow said the miner had contracts for 152,000 ounces of gold to be delivered over the next two years, but was pushing to close them out.

The hedges are held with Macquarie, a major lender to Bellevue. Stralow said its hedges were agreed years ago – well before gold’s recent bull run – to guarantee future revenue and to help the miner complete its eponymous mine.

“[The hedges were] to help us build up the mine and build up balance sheet strength,” he said.


An alternative to hedging is a put option, which gives companies the future choice to sell their gold at an agreed value regardless of the spot price. Unlike hedges, there is no obligation to sell.

Paul Cmrlec, managing director at Pantoro Gold, said put options were a cheaper and safer choice than hedges in a bullish gold environment.

“There’s still a massive risk in upside risk in the gold price, and you can go too far out with hedges,” he said, adding that it was possible to secure forward hedging contracts for $5500 an ounce.

“But if the price goes to $6000 an ounce, you’re in trouble.”


Please note rcw1 likes gold and everything associated with yellow :)

Kind regards
rcw1
 
Article appeared in the AFR electronic yesterday (10/08/25)

Miners abandon their gold hedges in the hope of bigger windfalls​


Australia’s gold miners have turned their backs on the security of guaranteed sales for their bullion in favour of the spot market, underlining the overwhelmingly bullish sentiment sweeping the sector.

Global trade tensions, regional wars, economic uncertainty and central bank demand have galvanised support for gold, sending the precious metal 40 per cent higher over the past year to more than $5200 per ounce. The average cost for Australian companies to produce an ounce of gold is about $2100, resulting in big margins if miners sell their bullion on the open market.

However, when gold bulls are more scarce, some miners agree to sell some of their future production at guaranteed prices at an agreed date – a form of financial de-risking called hedging. Fewer hedging contracts mean that miners are confident the price will continue to rise, or at least remain high. “The only reason you got a hedge is that you think the gold price is going to go down, and that’s a negative signal to the market,” said Paul Howard, mining analyst at Canaccord Genuity.

Miners presenting last week at the Diggers & Dealers conference, a major resources sector event held in the gold capital of Kalgoorlie, all pointed to a shift away from hedging to take advantage of the buoyant price.

Northern Star Resources, for instance, has axed its mandatory hedging policy, while Westgold Resources managing director Wayne Bramwell has long touted his company’s rejection of forward contracts.

“The company is unhedged. Absolutely nothing. We hedged previously, and that cost us a lot of money. Our view is that our best hedge is to get our costs under control,” said Bramwell. “Most of these gold companies with international shareholders don’t want Australian miners to hedge. They want full exposure to the gold price. When you hedge, you’re taking a view [of the future gold price]. And does anyone really know where the gold price is going? I’ve got zero impact on the external gold price, but I can control our costs.”

Howard said the rejection of hedging suggested that miners were “signalling to the market that they’re gold bulls”.

“They’re signalling to the market: ‘We think this will be sustained for a long time. We don’t want to waste shareholders’ money or lose margin by hedging.”


According to the World Gold Council, hedging in the June quarter was down 7.1 per cent year-on-year, continuing a long-term trend. Global gold production in the quarter remained strong at 1249 tonnes, up 3 per cent.

“Hedging is expected to be minimal as producers opt for exposure to strong prices. A more material drop in prices, which is a possibility … could encourage some producers to lock in prices at the margin,” it said.

View attachment 205779

Duncan Gibbs, managing director of Gold Road Resources, said: “Our philosophy around hedging was to do the minimum necessary. If you are drawing down debt, often it’s required by the banks, particularly if you are taking on higher levels of gearing.” “Gold Road has been unhedged for three or four years now. Hedging is about risk management, not about trying to predict the gold price,” said Gibbs, whose company recently agreed to be taken over by joint venture partner Gold Fields for $3.7 billion.

“Where you get caught is a run-up in the gold price in an inflationary environment. If you’ve locked in the gold price and your cost base is going up, it can squeeze your margins.”


Hedging can backfire if prices and costs move in the wrong direction, while some hedging is required to raise capital.

“Sometimes, it’s not [the company’s] decision to hedge. It’s the banks that are funding the debt for their project. It’s the bank protecting their money, so they put on a mandatory hedge. It guarantees them revenue in a changeable gold environment,” said Canaccord’s Howard.

A notable example is Bellevue Gold, a West Australian-based miner whose long-term hedging was caught out by soaring prices. Bellevue spent the bulk of a $156 million equity raise in April to escape from forward hedging contracts agreed for an average of $US2135 ($3270) per ounce.

Bellevue managing director Darren Stralow said the miner had contracts for 152,000 ounces of gold to be delivered over the next two years, but was pushing to close them out.

The hedges are held with Macquarie, a major lender to Bellevue. Stralow said its hedges were agreed years ago – well before gold’s recent bull run – to guarantee future revenue and to help the miner complete its eponymous mine.

“[The hedges were] to help us build up the mine and build up balance sheet strength,” he said.


An alternative to hedging is a put option, which gives companies the future choice to sell their gold at an agreed value regardless of the spot price. Unlike hedges, there is no obligation to sell.

Paul Cmrlec, managing director at Pantoro Gold, said put options were a cheaper and safer choice than hedges in a bullish gold environment.

“There’s still a massive risk in upside risk in the gold price, and you can go too far out with hedges,” he said, adding that it was possible to secure forward hedging contracts for $5500 an ounce.

“But if the price goes to $6000 an ounce, you’re in trouble.”


Please note rcw1 likes gold and everything associated with yellow :)

Kind regards
rcw1
@rcw1good article and informative.
 
Weekend Market Matters and a subscriber asked what are MM's currently preferred gold miners behind their first pick of Evolution (EVN).

Answer:

"A very fluid answer which is likely to vary week to week depending on the price of the individual stocks in question but three we like today, with gold trading ~$A5,200 on Wednesday, are:
  • Northern Star (NST) – this major producer has struggled since trading above $23 in April, correcting well over 30%. The fall was largely justified after their FY26 guidance and 4Q production numbers coming in slightly below consensus while cost guidance was revised higher (~$A2500/oz) with its All-in Sustaining Costs (AISC) ~5% above expectations – a bad one, two, three! We feel NST should occupy one of the three spots on size and having already worked through some tough geological times.
  • Ramelius (RMS) – we like RMS as a very low-cost producer; for the full 2025 financial year, RMS produced 301,664 ounces of gold at an AISC of $A1,551 per ounce, which was at the lower end of its updated AISC guidance range. We can see RMS making new highs above $3 when gold punches to new highs – it’s even paying a more than 4% grossed up yield while you wait!
  • Regis Resources (RRL) – we’ve flagged RRL as a good risk/reward more aggressive play over recent months. We like RRL after its almost 30% correction from its June highs, a significant correction considering the precious metal has only slipped ~7% over the same timeframe, i.e. a classic crowded trade unwinding.
A fourth for good luck is out of favour Bellevue Gold (BGL), which could be a takeover target in a sector where it’s cheaper to buy a new mine than develop one."
 
Top