Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Where is/can Donald Trump take US (sic)?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jump to new
dutchie said:
U.S. president-elect Donald Trump blamed Monday’s multiple terrorist attacks on radical Islamic terrorism, calling the deadly day a wake-up call for the world and vowing to destroy the Islamic State.

“Today there were terror attacks in Turkey, Switzerland and Germany - and it is only getting worse. The civilized world must change thinking!” he tweeted.

(my bolds)



http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/dec/19/donald-trump-germany-turkey-switzerland-attacks-wa/
Click to expand...


Dam terrorists!

If things have to be blown up and innocent people have to be sacrificed and terrorised, it better come off of a jet, a drone, a submarine, a frigate. Or it better come from rebels trained and supplied by designated good guys.

That's how you fight wars in a civil way.

Can't fight wars with knives, trucks, rocks, explosive vests... that's uncivilised bro.


On the bright side, Trump might actually mean a different and opposite, new kind of thinking. Not the new but old kind of more torturing some folks, taking out their families (and friends and neighbours), and just take the oil and go home kinda "rethink".
 
luutzu said:
Dam terrorists!

If things have to be blown up and innocent people have to be sacrificed and terrorised, it better come off of a jet, a drone, a submarine, a frigate. Or it better come from rebels trained and supplied by designated good guys.

That's how you fight wars in a civil way.

Can't fight wars with knives, trucks, rocks, explosive vests... that's uncivilised bro.


On the bright side, Trump might actually mean a different and opposite, new kind of thinking. Not the new but old kind of more torturing some folks, taking out their families (and friends and neighbours), and just take the oil and go home kinda "rethink".
Click to expand...

You are condoning these acts, Grasshopper?
 
SirRumpole said:
Trump hasn't got it wrapped up yet. The Electoral College could still vote against him.

Donald Trump: US celebrities urge Electoral College to vote against President-elect



http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-15/celebrities-urge-electoral-college-to-dump-trump/8124722
Click to expand...
How embarrassing for the Hollywood libtards, more college voters tried to go against Hillary than the Donald.

As is the rightful order of things, those useless overpaid badtids have no influence whatsoever
 
wayneL said:
You are condoning these acts, Grasshopper?
Click to expand...

I would never condone such a crime.

What I'm saying is that whether it's some crazy idiot murdering innocent people with a truck or a knife; or some other crazies murdering people with drones or missiles, it's all the same horrifying act of terrorism.

Just because "our" side, or friends of ours, does it doesn't mean it's any less murderous and barbaric.

Like I've been saying... if we want this kind of crap to stop, we can do a few things. One is to just keep cursing at Islam, hate the Muslims and permit the warmongers among us to cut public and social programs to fund jets and foreign adventures to liberate and educate and kill "them".

Or maybe we should stop taking over other people's country and resources. See if that would stop them from hating us and murdering our people. That might actually work.


It's no joke that there's a bunch of psychos in every capital city and power centres sitting around planning how best to murder "other" people. Then how much of their own people they're willing to sacrifice to get the job done.

I mean, the CIA and Pentagon know that the invasion of Iraq will mean increased blowback on Western and American soil. Does Bush, Blair, Howard and others great men of destiny care?

Maybe they care enough with that traffic light warning crap. But if we kill more of them than they of us, we're winning... apparently.


So we better get our head out of the warmongers' asses and start to think and understand why other people hate us so much.

To understand is not to sympathise or support or condone. But to know whether the price is worth whatever the reward is. If we think it's worth it, then sure, support more wars on terror war.

Just don't be stupid and lazy and just support whatever is necessary to "win" and liberate and democratise blah blah... then be shocked and surprised that the enemy are sadistic and crazy enough to fight back.

Yea, somehow it's fine and dandy for the civilised world to fly drones and take out gov't and lit the region to flame. That's all legal and all good because why?
 
Why not target military, or government institutions, rather than, innocent families out for a bratwurst, a mulled wine and gingerbread men?
 
wayneL said:
Why not target military, or government institutions, rather than, innocent families out for a bratwurst, a mulled wine and gingerbread men?
Click to expand...

They're psychopaths that's why.

That and it's war. In war all sides target "soft" targets.

So all the big and little Napoleons on both sides sit back in their air conditioned bunkers thinking grand strategy and sending out their tactical kill list. People then die.
 
I cannot for the life of me understand why this thread keeps on KEEPING ON.

Trump is the President elect and is constantly being condemned before he even takes office.

Is it just sour grapes from the Democrats having lost....Why can't they accept the result and move on.

Give the guy a chance to prove himself and if he fails then he will deserve to be condemned.
 
And you can't see anything in the choice of cabinet ministers he has made, comments regarding China, using his new office like a gold plated financial entry into the world economy to give you cause for concern ?

Well of course not Noco. Because that's the sort of guy you are :D:D:D:D
 
luutzu said:
They're psychopaths that's why.

That and it's war. In war all sides target "soft" targets.

So all the big and little Napoleons on both sides sit back in their air conditioned bunkers thinking grand strategy and sending out their tactical kill list. People then die.
Click to expand...

It's war then. Lets intern and or export the local muslims, lets bomb the crap out of their mosques as they pray, blow up their schools and markets... As primary target, lets forget about the fighter, lets go for the sof target.

This is the type of war you are condoning
 
basilio said:
And you can't see anything in the choice of cabinet ministers he has made, comments regarding China, using his new office like a gold plated financial entry into the world economy to give you cause for concern ?

Well of course not Noco. Because that's the sort of guy you are :D:D:D:D
Click to expand...

Thanks for your compliments Bas but just lets wait and see what happens in the US future with your concerns and wild predictions before condemning the man..

I know you would have preferred the Socialist Hillary Clinton be US president but please accept the fact that she lost.
Your expression of sour grapes will only make you look like you are still sucking on a lemon.

Cheer up old mate......It is not the end of the world.
 
wayneL said:
It's war then. Lets intern and or export the local muslims, lets bomb the crap out of their mosques as they pray, blow up their schools and markets... As primary target, lets forget about the fighter, lets go for the sof target.

This is the type of war you are condoning
Click to expand...

How does pointing out facts condoning it?

The Japs attacked Pearl Harbour on a lazy American weekend where the sailors were most likely drunk from the previous night's partying or off duty.

The Americans drop firebombs on Tokyo because of its timber houses build in close proximity to each other. They drop explosives on European/German cities instead.


And if I were to ever condone any act of war, I'd be condoning "our" act of war on them. Why? Because I might become crazy doing that, but never stupid.


And what make you think the war on terror aren't targeting soft targets? That's the first thing our warmongers do before they can permission to start carpet bombing - they sanction and starve the population to death. We've become so indoctrinated we think that that's a good thing. That kids and sick people not having access to food and medicine deserves to die slowly because our wise leaders don't like their dictator.

But yea, since Obama define any dead from American bombings as terrorist until proven otherwise, I guess all those they've killed are terrorist. So unless they come back from the dead and prove their innocents...
 
luutzu said:
The Americans drop firebombs on Tokyo because of its timber houses build in close proximity to each other. They drop explosives on European/German cities instead.


...
Click to expand...

Wrong



 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tisme said:
Wrong



Click to expand...


I'm quite delicate Tisme. Point taken, no need for illustration.

Apparently, bombing of civilian targets weren't considered a war crime at the Nuremburg Trial. Why? Because the Allied did more of it.

True story. That if "we" did it, it's not a crime. Ah the good old days, it never really left us.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
basilio said:
And you can't see anything in the choice of cabinet ministers he has made, comments regarding China, using his new office like a gold plated financial entry into the world economy to give you cause for concern ?

Well of course not Noco. Because that's the sort of guy you are :D:D:D:D
Click to expand...

I guess that is his prerogative.......Is there a problem with his choice of cabinet ministers?

I think it is sour grapes on your part because your beloved Socialist Hillary Clinton lost....The US Democrats are poor losers.

That Socialist Obama made some derogatory remarks about Australia but I guess that is OK in your eyes.
 
noco said:
I guess that is his prerogative.......Is there a problem with his choice of cabinet ministers?

I think it is sour grapes on your part because your beloved Socialist Hillary Clinton lost....The US Democrats are poor losers.

That Socialist Obama made some derogatory remarks about Australia but I guess that is OK in your eyes.
Click to expand...


Clinton and Obama are Socialists? :cigar:

That's like believing that Trump is the man of the common people.

Saw pics of him with China's Jack Ma today. Last month it was with Japan's Son... common denominator seems to be billion dollars and cents.
 
noco said:
I guess that is his prerogative.......Is there a problem with his choice of cabinet ministers?

I think it is sour grapes on your part because your beloved Socialist Hillary Clinton lost....The US Democrats are poor losers.

That Socialist Obama made some derogatory remarks about Australia but I guess that is OK in your eyes.
Click to expand...


In fact, Clinton lose because she's not a socialist. She faked her I feel your pain bs and not only were the people aware of it from their daily life experience under Bill and Barry's policies, but also from her times at the top.

If she had been more honest, her policies more progressive ("socialist"), she would have beat Trump like any business he had ever ran.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Garpal Gumnut
US Election 2024 : Stock and Economic Comment
7 8 9
Replies
174
Views
19K
qldfrog
qldfrog
Garpal Gumnut
President Trump 2020-2024: Economic Implications
2 3
Replies
49
Views
8K
divs4ever
divs4ever
bigdog
Why Donald Trump's Companies Went Bankrupt
Replies
3
Views
2K
noirua
noirua
basilio
The White House is sinking into a den of iniquity
Replies
3
Views
3K
Tisme
Tisme
basilio
Will smartphones be the end of us?
Replies
10
Views
4K
crackajack2
C
Top