Where is/can Donald Trump take US (sic)?

luutzu · 13 October 2016

Knobby22 said:
Most of the charitable donations are done in house, the 10% relates the amount given to other charities.

Asked for some examples of the work it performs itself, the Clinton Foundation listed these:
Clinton Development Initiative staff in Africa train rural farmers and help them get access to seeds, equipment and markets for their crops.
Clinton Climate Initiative staff help governments in Africa and the Caribbean region with reforestation efforts, and in island nations to help develop renewable energy projects.
Staff at the Clinton Health Access Initiative, an independent, affiliated entity, work in dozens of nations to lower the cost of HIV/AIDS medicine, scale up pediatric AIDS treatment and promote treatment of diarrhea through life-saving Zinc/ORS treatment.
Clinton Health Matters staff work with local governments and businesses in the United States to develop wellness and physical activity plans.

Don't ask about the Trump Foundation though if you don't want to see corruption in action!

I am saddened that Trump is so useless, if he had of been a great man then he would have been great for America. Clinton is essentially a conservative and nothing much will change with her.

Yea, can't ask Trump whether he's awesome and want to be a better man or not. Can't ask the Clintons what good they've done with their Foundation either.

If Bill and Hill really, genuinely, fearlessly want to do good and save the world... they'd done it with all those 30 years or more in politics where Bill was a governor, then president; she a Senator, SOS.

What good can they do now with $2B that they couldn't have done back then when, say, Bill has the office of the presidency and all that power? She a Senator and SES.

So the Foundation is nothing more than a tax-free way to launder money. They control the cash, that mean they have the influence and access to its assets as if it were in their own bank account.

So Clinton will win, American politics will go on as it has... then one day a clean, honest, patriotic American war hero turn up and promise that change the people want, if only they'd give him all the power. And they will give it to him.

Rome was a Republic for, what, 700 years before Julius Caesar thought he'd take the whole dam place over.

Living History, like the title of one of her $10m payback-day book.

Knobby22 · 13 October 2016

Yea, Clarke and Dawe say it all. Quite funny.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-10-13/clarke-and-dawe:-the-presidential-race-is/7929574

basilio · 13 October 2016

Knobby22 said:
Yea, Clarke and Dawe say it all. Quite funny.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-10-13/clarke-and-dawe:-the-presidential-race-is/7929574

They are always on the money. I thought this was particularly clever with Dawe offering a "sotto voce" alternative analysis of the candidates.

basilio · 14 October 2016

The New York Times has published a number of claims by women who allege Donald Trump assaulted them.

Naturally of course Donald has been totally outraged at such fabrications, demanded the allegations be withdrawn and said he will sue The New York Times for libel.

The response ? Love it. Read the rest.

...The essence of a libel claim, of course, is the protection of one's reputation. Mr. Trump has bragged about his non-consensual sexual touching of women. He has bragged about intruding on beauty pageant contestants in their dressing rooms. He acquiesced to a radio host's request to discuss Mr. Trump's own daughter as a "piece of ass." Multiple women not mentioned in our article have publicly come forward to report on Mr. Trump's unwanted advances. Nothing in our article has had the slightest effect on the reputation that Mr. Trump, through his own words and actions, has already created for himself. ..

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3141719/Response.pdf

noco · 14 October 2016

Anna Bligh threw as much dirt she could rake up about Campbell Newman and look where that got her.

The same thing could back fire on Clinton.......Most people don't like this sort of personal crucifixion.......Some of is also being fabricated to make Trump look bad.

SirRumpole · 14 October 2016

noco said:
Anna Bligh threw as much dirt she could rake up about Campbell Newman and look where that got her.

Government wasn't it ?

noco · 14 October 2016

SirRumpole said:
Government wasn't it ?

Welcome back Rumpy.

You are once again getting yourself all mixed up with Anna and Anastasia....They are two different women.

No, Anna Bligh went under leaving her and 6 others in the Labor state opposition...She then resigned and there was a bi-election.

Anastasia Palaszxzuk won the next election with her popular propaganda......"NO ASSETTS WILL BE SOLD UNDER THE GOVERNMENT I LEAD"......Ah la Julia Gillrad......She still has a debt of $80 billion left over from Beattie and Bligh........She has now back flipped and is now on the road to sell much of the government assets.......Liar....Liar.....Liar.

Newman went to the last election seeking public approval to sell or lease some assets to pay off Labor's bad debt resulting in him narrowly losing that election......Sounds like Labor's "MEDISCARE" LIE.

What ever it takes.

SirRumpole · 14 October 2016

noco said:
Welcome back Rumpy.

You are once again getting yourself all mixed up with Anna and Anastasia....They are two different women.

No, Anna Bligh went under leaving her and 6 others in the Labor state opposition...She then resigned and there was a bi-election.

Anastasia Palaszxzuk won the next election with her popular propaganda......"NO ASSETTS WILL BE SOLD UNDER THE GOVERNMENT I LEAD"......Ah la Julia Gillrad......She still has a debt of $80 billion left over from Beattie and Bligh........She has now back flipped and is now on the road to sell much of the government assets.......Liar....Liar.....Liar.

Newman went to the last election seeking public approval to sell or lease some assets to pay off Labor's bad debt resulting in him narrowly losing that election......Sounds like Labor's "MEDISCARE" LIE.

What ever it takes.

Oh my apologies. Yes I mixed them up, so sorry.

noco · 14 October 2016

SirRumpole said:
Oh my apologies. Yes I mixed them up, so sorry.

Apology accepted,,

Tisme · 14 October 2016

noco said:
Anna Bligh threw as much dirt she could rake up about Campbell Newman and look where that got her.

.

Well apart from Campbell doing what Libs do and using the public service to pursue false claims of impropriety against previous "honorable members" of parliament, she probably managed to educate the electorate on what would happen and subsequently did, thus Campbell's loss at the polls.

noco · 14 October 2016

Tisme said:
Well apart from Campbell doing what Libs do and using the public service to pursue false claims of impropriety against previous "honorable members" of parliament, she probably managed to educate the electorate on what would happen and subsequently did, thus Campbell's loss at the polls.

And what were those false claims?

bellenuit · 14 October 2016

Superb speech by Michelle Obama. I know eloquent people don't necessarily make great politicians, but I somehow feel that she is exactly what the US needs. Maybe on 2020.

Tisme · 15 October 2016

Grooming:

A 1992 wire report carried in newspapers, including the Chicago Tribune, quotes Trump telling two 14-year-old girls, “Wow! Just think””in a couple of years I’ll be dating you.”

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_facto...e&tse_id=INF_71e608a0919e11e6b6db4d0235f40af5

wayneL · 15 October 2016

bellenuit said:
Superb speech by Michelle Obama. I know eloquent people don't necessarily make great politicians, but I somehow feel that she is exactly what the US needs. Maybe on 2020.

That would mean over 30years of presidencies from only 3 families:1zhelp::1zhelp:

I can't count the ways I would say no way

SirRumpole · 15 October 2016

wayneL said:
That would mean over 30years of presidencies from only 3 families:1zhelp::1zhelp:

I can't count the ways I would say no way

You probably wouldn't have minded if Jeb Bush got in though ?

basilio · 15 October 2016

Trump has found the answer to his lying accusers !! Remember that crazy businesswomen who said that the Don turned into an octupus and basically mauled her in the First Class seats of an American flight ?

Turns out that someone else was sitting in the next seat on that flight and clearly remembers that in fact it was the woman who was all over The Don ! Fancy that. 35 years later and he can clearly remember an incident on a plane trip (that wasn't some incredible killing/orgy/whatever). And obviously the Trump campaign managers have fully checked out this guys credentials.

Isn't truth stranger than fiction. Can't wait to see the witnesses that emerge to trump all the other fantasists who have debased Trump's great reputation....

http://www.redstate.com/jaycaruso/2...-young-boys-high-ranking-british-politicians/

basilio · 15 October 2016

I've bin thinking... (very dangerous I know..)

I reckon the Trump nomination, ascendency and final collapse is just a very devious "Lying Hilary" concoction. When you think about it carefully it's so obvious.

First set up one of the most obnoxious, unprincipled person ever to become a Republician candidate for the election. Make sure they have the biggest mouth and the loosest principles in the US.

Second quietly manage to kill off any competing candidates. What you have left is essentially a a dangerous megalomaniac with enough discoverable history to make his final demise so, so easy.

So here is Hilary at least looking better than the toad fish and when she pulls the trigger she can devastate Trump and all the Republicans who supported him through a hundred vicious attacks on mexicans, women, blacks, Muslims ect. ect.

_______________________________________________________________________________

I think I'll start writing the book now while it's fresh in my mind. Pass the spiff please.

luutzu · 15 October 2016

basilio said:
I've bin thinking... (very dangerous I know..)

I reckon the Trump nomination, ascendency and final collapse is just a very devious "Lying Hilary" concoction. When you think about it carefully it's so obvious.

First set up one of the most obnoxious, unprincipled person ever to become a Republician candidate for the election. Make sure they have the biggest mouth and the loosest principles in the US.

Second quietly manage to kill off any competing candidates. What you have left is essentially a a dangerous megalomaniac with enough discoverable history to make his final demise so, so easy.

So here is Hilary at least looking better than the toad fish and when she pulls the trigger she can devastate Trump and all the Republicans who supported him through a hundred vicious attacks on mexicans, women, blacks, Muslims ect. ect.

_______________________________________________________________________________

I think I'll start writing the book now while it's fresh in my mind. Pass the spiff please.

The Republican politicians like Clinton more than they do Trump.

Trump is slightly unpredictable. The donors can't really be certain what he'd do. With Clinton, they both know how the game is played and what the game plans are.

luutzu · 15 October 2016

bellenuit said:
Superb speech by Michelle Obama. I know eloquent people don't necessarily make great politicians, but I somehow feel that she is exactly what the US needs. Maybe on 2020.

Yes, the thing about the Obamas is they will do what they say they'll do.

I haven't been following but what has Michelle been doing these 8 years? Beside appearing on talk and comedy shows; use her position to get early copies of Downton Abbey; start that veggie garden (organic, for sure). Oh yea, tell kids to eat healthy.

I guess a First Lady would only ever see the need to go out and help her fellow citizens, fight for justice and end to poverty when the country is at war, when its economy just collapsed and its people living in desperate poverty... Oh wait.

So yea, let vote for the pretty face who can give good speeches. It's not like people can't get to hear nice words at the movies or something.

luutzu · 15 October 2016

wayneL said:
That would mean over 30years of presidencies from only 3 families:1zhelp::1zhelp:

I can't count the ways I would say no way

Why not though Sifu. Western democracies have been ruled by one party with two factions for longer than that 3 decades.

Where is/can Donald Trump take US (sic)?

luutzu

Knobby22

Mmmmmm 2nd breakfast

basilio

basilio

noco

SirRumpole

noco

SirRumpole

noco

Tisme

Apathetic at Best

noco

bellenuit

Tisme

Apathetic at Best

wayneL

VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!

SirRumpole

basilio

basilio

luutzu

luutzu

luutzu

Similar threads

Where is/can Donald Trump take US (sic)?

Mmmmmm 2nd breakfast

Apathetic at Best

Apathetic at Best

VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency