- Joined
- 23 November 2004
- Posts
- 3,974
- Reactions
- 851
29, 1 to go Malcolm28
2 to go Malcolm.
29, 1 to go Malcolm28
2 to go Malcolm.
29, 1 to go Malcolm
I reckon the next figures will conveniently coincide with a win for the Govt on company tax cuts.
Wow, that would be a well researched and unbiased report.Tax concessions to wealthy costing six times the dole: Anglicare
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-03-...elfare-costs-in-perspective-anglicare/9585930
Congratulations Malcolm!29, 1 to go Malcolm
(doesn't matter who really - your all out of touch).
One thing I agree with Tony Abbott (and Peter Dutton) about:-
Tony Abbott says Malcolm Turnbull has his 'knickers in a twist' over migration policy
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-04-11/abbott-attacks-turnbull-over-immigration-report-denial/9640784
Very few people think and the standard of public debate is terrible these days.Ever since the SSM plebiscite I have very little faith that anywhere near the majority of voter drones have a clue what's good
The sole aim of any new government, from day one, is to be re-elected at the next election.Everyone since, on both sides of politics, has been at best focused on the present and at worst outright useless. The odd good thing here and there but as a whole they're duds.
Agreed for most of them but I can think of exceptions.The sole aim of any new government, from day one, is to be re-elected at the next election.
Absolutely nothing else matters.
At the national level Hawke / Keating weren’t exactly known for popular budgets.
I would love a Keating of any stripe these days.
Well, except if he was green. But then, a Keating wouldn't be, would he?
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.