The Turnbull Government

[SirRumpole]

I see Ms Credlin has come out fighting blaming everyone but herself. The reality is that if she had done her job better then she may still have it.

 

[Tisme]

I see Ms Credlin has come out fighting blaming everyone but herself. The reality is that if she had done her job better then she may still have it.

yeah the masculine sisters have been having one of their man hating symposiums where they can blame man built glass ceilings for their lack of progress in emulating male roles.

another situation where the weak minded are rounded up by the dominants and fed a line about the tribe being held back..... meanwhile, come evening, their husbands are scared to go home and get the rounds for being a b45tard.

 

[SirRumpole]

Peta Credlin said she might have been treated differently if she was a man.

Yes, she would have been taken out into a back alley and given a right rough up (know what I mean ?)

 

[Tisme]

Peta Credlin said she might have been treated differently if she was a man.

Yes, she would have been taken out into a back alley and given a right rough up (know what I mean ?)

Back in the day they invented quota positions like "human resource" managers so women could fill them. Maybe we should split the prime ministership into a bifurcated position = male+ female

 

[Logique]

I see Ms Credlin has come out fighting blaming everyone but herself. The reality is that if she had done her job better then she may still have it.

Indeed, the current member best placed to judge, voted with his feet. New Cabinet Secretary in the Turnbull government, Sen Arthur Sinodinos.

 

[SirRumpole]

Indeed, the current member best placed to judge, voted with his feet. New Cabinet Secretary in the Turnbull government, Sen Arthur Sinodinos.

Chiefs of staff can be likened to football umpires, if you don't notice them then they are doing a good job.

In all the years Howard was in office and Sinodinus was his C.O.S, I never heard of him, which means he was quietly doing his job behind the scenes.

Credlin on the other hand...

 

[dutchie]

The difference between Abbott and Turnbull:


Abbott: the point, the point, the point.


Turnbull: waffle, waffle, waffle, the point, waffle waffle, waffle.

 

[MrBurns]

Chiefs of staff can be likened to football umpires, if you don't notice them then they are doing a good job.

In all the years Howard was in office and Sinodinus was his C.O.S, I never heard of him, which means he was quietly doing his job behind the scenes.

Credlin on the other hand...

Credlin is a soccer mom from the wrong side of town, big mouth loads of attitude and a consummate bully.

Tony must have had a dominatrix fetish to keep her around.

 

[Knobby22]

Credlin is a soccer mom from the wrong side of town, big mouth loads of attitude and a consummate bully.

Tony must have had a dominatrix fetish to keep her around.

Wasn't her job to give advice?
Did she agree with the idea to knight Prince Phillip?

 

[luutzu]

Seems Australia has a "spending problem".

Austerity fails here, there, every where... let's try it again. Might work this time 'round.


Oh man, we're doomed.

 

[SirRumpole]

Seems Australia has a "spending problem".

Austerity fails here, there, every where... let's try it again. Might work this time 'round.


Oh man, we're doomed.

Yes I saw that Morrison interview too.

There is no revenue problem ?

Fine , a GST increase is not necessary then is it ?

 

[luutzu]

Yes I saw that Morrison interview too.

There is no revenue problem ?

Fine , a GST increase is not necessary then is it ?

na, there's a revenue problem too... So you raise the GST, which will costs people more to spend so they spend more? Then you cut corporate taxes so corporations will pass those tax cuts onto their employees and customers.

Then you cut gov't spending because that will create jobs? Put more money into pensioners and lazy bums pockets?

These guys couldn't do basic maths... maybe it's a higher game plan they're playing.

 

[Knobby22]

Let's not give up yet. It's just making noises at present.

 

[SirRumpole]

Morrison suggested the Family Tax Benefits would come under consideration.

This was one of John Howards "reckless spending" schemes financed by the mining boom which has now ended, but I'd like to see him sell cutting this benefit but leaving the high income super tax breaks untouched.

 

[sptrawler]

Morrison suggested the Family Tax Benefits would come under consideration.

This was one of John Howards "reckless spending" schemes financed by the mining boom which has now ended, but I'd like to see him sell cutting this benefit but leaving the high income super tax breaks untouched.

How many years ago was that? and what did Labor do about it?

Jeez, talk about time lapse photography.:1zhelp:

Have you no perception, that since Howard, Labor had two terms of office.

If they thought there was something wrong with the benefit, why aren't they just as responsible, for not addressing it?

You go on about Abbott blaming Gillard, yet you are still blaming Howard? weird logic IMO

 

[sydboy007]

Let's just see where Turnbull goes on renewables and if the coal industry still has him by the goolies.

They're still talking about doing their best to prop up the Carmichael coal mine white elephant.

You'd think they could talk about investing in an industry with a long term future, one that isn't facing decades of oversupply.

 

[SirRumpole]

How many years ago was that? and what did Labor do about it?

Jeez, talk about time lapse photography.:1zhelp:

Have you no perception, that since Howard, Labor had two terms of office.

If they thought there was something wrong with the benefit, why aren't they just as responsible, for not addressing it?

You go on about Abbott blaming Gillard, yet you are still blaming Howard? weird logic IMO

Labor should have done something about it, but Howard bought it in in the first place, therefore he started the spending spree.

 

[sydboy007]

Labor should have done something about it, but Howard bought it in in the first place, therefore he started the spending spree.

Obviously the last one to touch it broke it

 

[sptrawler]

Labor should have done something about it, but Howard bought it in in the first place, therefore he started the spending spree.

Yes, ok that absconds Labor of any blame.

That is the whole problem with one eyed voters.

Those who brought in policy, to suit the economics of the time, have to wear the consequences ad infinitum.

Just think on it a bit.

As for spending spree, don't forget when Howard left, there was a surplus of $20B + $80B was put into the future fund to finance Government pension obligations.

That future fund has now doubled to $160B and is going to return money to the Government.

What the ffffff did Labor do, other than a resource rent tax, that would get ffff all now because the resources are worth ffff all.
The other tax, the carbon tax, just made our manufacturing industries non competitive and shut them down.

Maybe you can explain what two terms of Labor did for us, rather than pay out on someone that left a surplus?

It is just limp, to keep skipping over a completely inept useless Labor government. God help us, if they get in next election.IMO

 

[sptrawler]

Obviously the last one to touch it broke it

No Syd, obviously the last one to touch it, did fff all about it.