- Joined
- 26 March 2014
- Posts
- 20,821
- Reactions
- 13,868
I doubt it.
The Libs ran a rubbish campaign and gave people nothing to vote for.
Thats about it really.
I doubt it.Brilliant, we elected a Party in *Australia* based on an *American* President because Orange Man Bad?
Brilliant, just brilliant. Meanwhile in *Australia*..…....
If so, Australians are more profoundly stupid than I imagined.
Exactly, I was being sarcastic.I doubt it.
The Libs ran a rubbish campaign and gave people nothing to vote for.
Thats about it really.
The vision is pretty shortsighted these days . It just seems to be "we are better than Labor", with no evidence.Exactly, I was being sarcastic.
Except I do not agree that the Liberals did not give Australians anything to vote for. They have vision which is nothing less than the Labor Party, apart from the kerfuffle over nuclear and other issues which amounted to minutiae.
The Liberals alienated their base constituency... again.
The Liberals have absolutely no idea, as was shown and if either Angus or Andrew get the nod, they will be toast also IMO.Exactly, I was being sarcastic.
Except I do not agree that the Liberals did not give Australians anything to vote for. They have vision which is nothing less than the Labor Party, apart from the kerfuffle over nuclear and other issues which amounted to minutiae.
The Liberals alienated their base constituency... again.
If Trump was an issue, Labor would have made it more of an election issue, they didn't. As simple as that.Trump was a major issue Price was shut down talking about Trump during the election not the only factor but think its in there the swing to Labor was more than just about Dutton
Potential liberal voters saw that there was no "better than labor", that was the problem.... Perhaps in terms of actual Menzian liberalism a whole lot worse, what with their totally authoritarian agenda.The vision is pretty shortsighted these days . It just seems to be "we are better than Labor", with no evidence.
Maybe they scared people with their nuclear policy. I doubt John Howard would have done that, but he had it good with exports to China raking in the shekels and no need to deal with difficult things like climate change.
Times have changed and our leaders have to change with them.
Hastie has withdrawn from the race apparently.The Liberals have absolutely no idea, as was shown and if either Angus or Andrew get the nod, they will be toast also IMO.
Whether people like it or not, the leader is the shop front, they are the ones who have to project the vision.
If they can't, then the party has picked the wrong person, for the wrong reasons IMO.
Following on from that, the person who goes for the leaders position, has to believe in what the party is projecting and be completely over the intricacies of the issues.
Liberals need to actually look in the mirror, before throwing their hats in the ring, the media will carve them up if they don't.
Does that mean that you would support an end to negative gearing and CGT tax deductions for the sake of the younger generations ?You're only salient point is that times *have changed, but with no solutions from either side apart from pork barreling and gaslighting to the detriment of younger generations.
I would support changes to negative gearing as applied which I have detailed previously on this forum.Does that mean that you would support an end to negative gearing
Again I would support changes to CGT law which once again I have detailed on this forum previously.and CGT tax deductions for the sake of the younger generations ?
only as a soundbite or 2. (with subtitles)Looks like the Jacquie Lambie network may not survive.
Good, he might be a nice guy and he must be hell of a good Australian to sign up for the defence force.Hastie has withdrawn from the race apparently.
If Trump was an issue, Labor would have made it more of an election issue, they didn't. As simple as that.
And remove franking credits from everyone, just do it until the debt is paid and then review it.Does that mean that you would support an end to negative gearing and CGT tax deductions for the sake of the younger generations ?
You're waffling, maybe put the cork back in the bottle, you didn't use any punctuation in the post.Labor stayed focused on their game plan Liberals didn't and had to ditch Trump style efficiency drive arla Trump / Musk also shut Price down when she was repeating make Australia great again maybe you missed it.
Do a search of Trump factor in Australian election head lines word wide reported on it.
Again the swing to Labor was historic and for that to happen Liberal voters voted Labor normally that's due to risk I think people saw Dutton's Trump reference's as a massive risk.
The lose is not just about how useless Liberals or how brilliant Labor is there is far more to it IMHO and that's the total rejection of Trump style politics, policies.
Like, in "3635, if man is still alive"And remove franking credits from everyone, just do it until the debt is paid and then review it.
That would be brilliant.
Yes 2006 was the last time.Like, in "3635, if man is still alive"
Yeah, but we be $0 -> >$1,000,000,000 in less than twenty years, with ad infinitum spending promises, ad infinitum.Yes 2006 was the last time.
Yep and there is nothing on the horizon, to turn it around, oh well that's life.Yeah, but we be $0 -> >$1,000,000,000 in less than twenty years, with ad infinitum spending promises, ad infinitum.
In the year 2525, if man is still alive..Like, in "3635, if man is still alive"
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?