"Our environment – and I mean our man-made world of machines, artificial constructs, computers, electronic systems, interlinking homeostatic components – all of this is in fact beginning more and more to possess what the earnest psychologists fear the primitive sees in his environment: animation.
"In a very real sense our environment is becoming alive, or at least quasi-alive, and in ways specifically and fundamentally analogous to ourselves... Rather than learning about ourselves by studying our constructs, perhaps we should make the attempt to comprehend what our constructs are up to by looking into what we ourselves are up to.
or,AI is looking good. Check this out and ask yourself how can you ever believe what you see again
or,
Over 700 Indians PRETENDED to Be AI "Natasha", Earning Nearly $500 Million Back in 2016, two Indian entrepreneurs — inspired by the booming promise of AI — founded BuilderAI. Their main selling point? A chatbot named Natasha, supposedly capable of building apps from user prompts. The project quickly took off, thanks to Natasha — a so-called revolutionary no-code AI, often compared to ChatGPT. But there was one big catch: Natasha wasn’t an AI at all. She was a team of over 700 real developers in India.
Here’s how it worked when a customer placed an order: Planners created a concept for the app. Developers manually built the prototype. The final product was uploaded to the customer’s dashboard. The apps almost always had bugs, the code was unreadable, and core features often didn’t work — but the team rushed to fix everything manually, all under the illusion of AI.
The company operated like this for eight years without raising much suspicion. During that time, it attracted $445 million in funding from top-tier tech investors. But in the end, the startup was declared bankrupt, and the entire scheme was fully exposed.
Just be careful down the track as to who is on the other side of the trade. Yoshua Bengio, one of the founders of AI has concerns that some advanced AI models may be cheating and has set up a non-profit to investigate further and warn users of this risk.After the success of last week, this week has been a bit of a bust.
I am close to implementing an LSTM, it was a bit more work than i originally intended and still not done so i have no results to compare yet.
I am training it ok and It's definately a beast. I had to shrink the size of the network considerably to get it to train without running out of Memory and training time increased to 10 or so hours with a smallish network.
The evaluations that i can do are taking a minute to compute. The old network was in the mS so it's a few orders of magnitude in computational power to predict future prices. I don't know if it's going to be any better at it, i suspect it will revert to the mean like the other one did. I am hoping that it CAN pick out some patterns over time so i can compare the results between the 2 networks. Of all the types I've researched, LSTM is the one for this job.
I have also made the prediction time variable in both types of networks now. I am going to build individual networks to predict 1,2,3,5,8,13 etc days into the future and see if a shorter or longer time frame enhances it's abilities.
That's it for this week. Enjoy the sunshine
That makes sense. Every guy and gal with a wheelbarrow and a trowel is building an AI centre atm and they don't want partners and the potential partners are thus finding it difficult to get loans. NVDA has moved in to the centre sector field. I must check on the AI Centre ETF's.The Wall Street Journal reported that SoftBank and OpenAI’s US$500bn AI infrastructure project has been scaled back. Broadcom fell more than 3%, Nvidia dropped over 2%, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing lost nearly 2%.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?