- Joined
- 8 June 2008
- Posts
- 14,718
- Reactions
- 22,365
Victoria is small, smaller farms more intense and easier to draw a power line for fixed use: think vegetable, orchard, dairyYes.
Irrigation pumping is one but even that isn't consistent. Some places the normal way is electricity, others it's a fuel driven pump, others I've seen it done using the PTO from a tractor to drive the pump.
I don't really know the history of it in other states but in Tas farmers have always been encouraged farmers to irrigate with off-peak electricity. In the pre-electronic metering days that was done with simply two rotating disc meters and a mechanical timer. Modern way of doing it's fully electronic.
The other big one is dairy. Refrigeration, milking machines and for reasons I'm unsure of they also use a lot of hot water that's heated to a fairly high temperature (substantially higher than household hot water, I recall it being 82 degrees but don't quote me on that). Again the encouragement was always to heat the water using off-peak electricity and there was a tariff for that purpose which provided supply during the middle of the day as well as overnight which, with the recommended element to storage ratio of 32 Watts per litre, enabled the hot water to be refilled twice daily between milking.
Which raises another important point that utilities used to actively work with industry to come up with mutually acceptable ways of doing things. Means by which to pump or heat water whilst keeping peak demand and cost as low as possible. Everyone wins. That this sort of thing no longer really happens is part of where it's gone wrong.....
Looking at overall farm (including forestry and fishing) energy use in total, you're absolutely right that it mostly isn't electric.
Figures may not add to 100% due to rounding of the source data. All data is 2022-23 from Australian Government statistics - I've just converted it from the raw form to % of total.
National:
Diesel & Petrol = 89.2%
LPG = 1.8%
Natural gas = 1.9%
Electricity = 6.8%
NSW:
Diesel & Petrol = 88.8%
LPG = 1.8%
Natural gas = 1.6%
Electricity = 7.7%
Vic:
Diesel & Petrol = 71.8%
LPG = 1.4%
Natural gas = 10.8%
Electricity = 15.8%
Qld:
Diesel & Petrol = 93.7%
LPG = 1.9%
Natural gas = 0.2%
Electricity = 4.1%
WA:
Diesel & Petrol = 95.4%
LPG = 1.9%
Natural gas = 0.1%
Electricity = 2.4%
SA:
Diesel & Petrol = 87.7%
LPG = 1.7%
Natural gas = 0.5%
Electricity = 9.8%
Tas:
Diesel & Petrol = 90.7%
LPG = 1.8%
Natural gas = 0.3%
Electricity = 7.0%
NT:
Diesel & Petrol = 90.7%
LPG = 1.7%
Natural gas = zero
Electricity = 7.4%
So there's a much higher use of fixed in place energy sources, that is electricity and natural gas, in Victoria compared to other states. What that's for I'm really not sure, but I'm assuming irrigation pumping would at least partly explain it along with dairy.
Getting out of my depth there on the farming side though.
Anything broad acre farming: cattle sheep or massive cereal sorghum fields nope
Anyway, should net zero succeed, it will be really hard to be fed.
If petrol and diesel are used less overall, it will become less reliable much more expensive to provide it in remote areas and there is no replacement currently
Synfuels could be the way out but it is politically incorrect : net zero as a pretext to limit individual transport not an aim ,otherwise we would be pushing syngas to allow existing fleet use.