wayneL
VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!
- Joined
- 9 July 2004
- Posts
- 26,554
- Reactions
- 14,284
"You can tell a lot about a person by how they react when someone dies."
-Charlie Kirk
"You can tell a lot about a person by how they react when someone dies."
-Charlie Kirk
The left wingers on here give the christians an absolute flogging. LolWhat? You think only Left Wingers are Christians?(Replying to post that no longer exists).
The only difference is the left hold the stage at the moment, but when assasination of people you don't like becomes something to rejoice, one knows it has gone to far left.
No it would re fire up the Court/ Falou crucifixion travesty. LolYes, but I wouldn't equate the political Left with Christianity in any way. No "true" Christian would rejoice in senseless violence, and the Left have their arguments with Christians in a few areas (gender issues, abortion etc).
Christianity is a whole can of worms, there are Left leaning Christians and Right leaning Christians. They study different parts of the Bible, and cherry-pick what they feel like.
But that's another story, which I don't think we want to go into here.![]()
When people talk about the Jews, I like to point out there are no "The Jews".. They study different parts of the Bible, and cherry-pick what they feel like.
But that's another story, which I don't think we want to go into here.![]()
Maybe there is no "The Left" or "The Right" either?When people talk about the Jews, I like to point out there are no "The Jews".
Likewise, there are no "The Christians".
Fair point. There is definitely a wide spectrum in everything. But we should call out extremism in any and every ideology.Maybe there is no "The Left" or "The Right" either?
Not much point, that is the US, sickos everywhere.
They should be called out too.Not much point, that is the US, sickos everywhere.
I'm sure I could find RWNJ's on social media gunning for "Lefties", but I just couldn't be bothered.
If we let ourselves be run by social media we are going into very dark corners.
They should be called out too.
But I already mentioned the poisonous Abbie Chatfield and her cohorts with regard to this... and then we have the egregious Zali Steggall:
Insomuch as murderous dictators are, by definition, extremists, sure. But we, and they, are currently speaking in the context of Charlie Kirk and the broader context of Western politics, not Pol Pot, Che Guevara, or Joseph Stalin.I disagree with her in this context.
More broadly speaking, getting rid of murderous dictators for the good of a country or the world may be justified.
Do you agree?
Insomuch as murderous dictators are, by definition, extremists, sure. But we, and they, are currently speaking in the context of Charlie Kirk and the broader context of Western politics, not Pol Pot, Che Guevara, or Joseph Stalin.
Charlie Kirk was a moderate Christian conservative whose only weapon was speech. He sought only to have conversation and debate, his battlefield only in the arena of ideas. He not a murderous dictator, nor did he ever promote anything remotely like that.
His most radical position was in promoting marriage, having children and knowing Jesus.
Is shooting Kirk, blowing out his carotid artery, in front of his wife and thousands of young people and the nation, what Zali Steggall agrees is justifiable violence? For traditional family and religious life?
What happened to arguing ideas with speech, rather than blowing someone away like a sniveling coward on a rooftop from 200m away, then scurrying away like a cockroach?
All true, but perhaps you could highlight this speech for discussion for greater context... and there is context to be considered. Christianity is not exempt from agendization (sic)I agree with most of what you said.
I was just defending Ms Steggall who I don't believe agreed with Kirk's killing. But no doubt the outrage media and RWNJ's will try and pretend that she did.
Incidentally, "knowing Jesus" is, as you alluded to previously a matter of interpretation. J.C. preached that people should care for strangers (e.g. migrants) and the marginalised (https://jesusleadershiptraining.com/foreigners-what-did-jesus-say-about-foreigners/#:~:text=Matthew 25:35-40: Jesus teaches the importance of welcoming,,the least among people is done for Him.) , maybe including gays and trans people and not try and demonise them. Kirk's speech seems to be in conflict with those teachings, so I'm not sure he "knew" Jesus very well.![]()
So what about all the migrants, working jobs, paying taxes, that get rounded up, put in chains and get thrown out of the country?But it does not mean welcoming entities that means us harm is biblical.
illegal immigrants.So what about all the migrants, working jobs, paying taxes, that get rounded up, put in chains and get thrown out of the country?
This does not happen to legal migrants.So what about all the migrants, working jobs, paying taxes, that get rounded up, put in chains and get thrown out of the country?
illegal immigrants.
should you not respect laws and so the constitution due to your religion? an Islamist view in the EU for example .
we need another thread for this exchange
See #838This does not happen to legal migrants.
Somewhat agree, but who is it that is getting shot and killed?Looking at it from a pragmatic point of view that's fine. I was speaking from a religious context (I'm not religious but I know a bit about the Bible), and people who claim to be Christians and then treat other people like cr@p are frauds. If they want to treat other people like cr@p ok, but don't pretend to be Christian at the same time, it just doesn't go with the teachings.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.