This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Trump Era 2025-2029 : Stock and Economic Comment

I hope so. I like it when people panic.

Although I'm always reminded of that quote:
'When the time comes to buy, you won't want to'.
I've done staggered buy orders in increments of 15.

525, 510, 495, 480, 465, 450. Amounts increasing each time to keep my average buy price chasing the actual market price.
 
Interesting time ...
More than a Trump thread, the usual is it the big crash we needed to have, and the questions it always raises
Starting heavy in PM and cash at 2/3..
The very personal dilemma we probably all have
1) what do you do with the stocks you already have, join the panic and get out because -10% is better than -20%
After all, if you do not buy the market yet, you should sell pure logic..
2) when do you jump in and consider the bargains..is there enough blood in the street yet.. "Dad, are we there yet?" as psyche can make you wait for more, and not get anything..my covid failure.
3) a meeting with your accountant on Monday asking you to trigger capital gain this FY...
But this 60% cash war chest is here to get invested for such circumstances.
We will all have busy minds in the following weeks
I like the staggered entry in the Spy approach from @over9k BTW.
A nice way to put rationality in a decision
 

Hard disagree.

The only reason the US is in its current position of financial approach is because the rest of the world agreed to make USDs the global reserve currency.

This is there perfect time for a crash as politics and economics are now starting to collide. This is no longer a cost balancing act that markets need to reprice. Relationships with the US are being drastically, and it seems in some cases irrevocably, reset.
People, and therefore politicians, are not interested in placating what they perceived to be unjust policies coming out of the US. This is particularly telling in Canada, Europe and even Australia, with "Tumpist" politicians losing support.

Nationalism is returning, and that doesn't involve the US.
So why would you need to maintain investments in the US when political will is providing economic opportunity for domestic investments?
We're already seeing this - US companies are already seeing the effect of 'Buy Canadian', the USD, bonds and markets are falling.
Instead, we're seeing countries and blocs invest in their own economies. The best example is the remilitarisation of the EU.

I think what we're unfortunately seeing is the breakdown of globalisation. Global trade will become more expensive unless ex-USA nations are willing to come together and form their own independent trading networks - BRICS anyone?

As for the US debt - either these tarrifs are being used to set-up a future debt forgiveness deal or, as the US has done many times in the past, they will default and declare it an economic imperative for US supremacy.
 
Last edited:
from Playboy magazine in 1990, when Trump was 43.

Asked how he felt about Japan’s economic pre-eminence, Trump answered: “Japan gets almost 70 per cent of its oil from the Persian Gulf, relies on ships led back home by our destroyers, battleships, helicopters, frogmen.

“Then the Japanese sail home, where they give the oil to fuel their factories so that they can knock the hell out of General Motors, Chrysler and Ford. Their openly screwing us is a disgrace. Why aren’t they paying us? The Japanese cajole us, they bow to us, they tell us how great we are, and then they pick our pockets. We’re losing hundreds of billions of dollars a year while they laugh at our stupidity."
 
Hence the rest of the world's military buildout now.

The yanks are simply no longer footing everyone else's bills. They no longer need the oil themselves which means that the rest of the world can no longer piggyback off their security provision.

Hence tariffs, nato defunding, you can all now worry about yourselves.
 
The end and most likely replacement of the Bretton woods system
 
More? One point we will disagree.
Is it better to have cheap cars and be unemployed or a barista, or working in a car factory paying off an expensive car you built?
Short term, medium term, long term?
If the US can not make it with tariffs, it will just be the nail on the coffin already there.
->What do they have to loose?
Serious, they can not push the can further forever, at least this is orderly..
We all knew about the plan coming
And better than a hot war is my view which is the last escape route
Will this hurt the world economy yes, especially places like the EU and Australia where globalisation is our only way to survive:
Selling our assets overseas,: debt, mining, agriculture and buying life needs overseas: everything
Even before Trump, India and China, the EU let alone other smaller countries had huge tariff or border closures.
Noone was even noticing it seems...
It is not the end of the world but it is the end of globalisation yes
 
There is good and bad in that, but I've never trusted the globalists so I'm leaving into the good.
 
Targeted tariffs with treaties.

They are making sure they lose.

(Example: Tesla - Premium car company now subject to counter tariffs and the USA backlash from the attack on the other countries. Game over for them when they were winning.)

(And sure Musk hasn't helped by getting involved in foreign elections).
 
maybe not as much since 2020 , for instance the US doesn't have much heavy crude production ( used for diesel and bitumen ) a lot of that comes from Canada and Venezuela , China and India process a huge amount of pharmaceutical ingredients

and NATO has a problem of a lot of their equipment is old an out-dated ( or burning in the fields of Ukraine )
 
"Australia Imports from United States was US$34.72 Billion during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. Australia Imports from United States - data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on April of 2025. "



Imports from the US have doubled since 2021 (the last bar in graph is 2024).
Simple supply demand rules would suggest that supply routes will change and balance out again given time.
The US will be boycotted where possible or necessary by globalisation, the desire to buy cheaper is inherently built in and well established.
It will be interesting to see how it all plays out,
I'm thinking that the winners of this at the moment are countries like Germany, Japan, China, India etc, and South East Asia in particular, as their manufacturing base has increased exponentially in the last few years.

I've said this before, how fast is the US going to be able to ramp up their own manufacturing again?

 
No one outside of the US is going to buy a plastic bucket from the US that costs $8 because of the tariffs and labour costs, when they can buy a Chinese one for $5. Most of their raw materials come from outside of the US, so whatever they make is going to cost them more and it multiplies by every time they buy raw materials that have tariffs on them.

I want to see the general Chevy diesel truck driving American work at the same rate as people from a third world country.

The products that were consumed by the US will be directed at other countries, most likely at a cheaper rate.
 
well since they don't have the worker-base of India or China ... not soon enough , then you have the crumbling bridges and rail-lines

Australia has to opportunity to ride some coat-tails here but probably won't
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...