No post facts when accusing someone. Its that easy.Nice to see others using the method of when you don't like the facts call it fake news or insinuate people who state the obvious of derangement.
No post facts when accusing someone. Its that easy.
If trump has been solidly linked then post it up. It may come down the track, but right now we do not have proof.
This thread really proves my thesis
You don't fuel lies. Him being a sht person is one thing. But Russian collusion has not been proven. And the indictments had no bearing on trump as to now.What's your thesis? We should support Trump as an ally, but we should also be wary due to his past/nature.
I'm not defending him. I'm defending his right to not be smeared on made up evidence. There is a huge media bias against him and they are pushing half truths as facts. This fuels twitter/social media and those too lazy to investigate further. Then lies become "fact".Mo what is fact "would or wouldn't"?
Every time the criminal opens his mouth he lies that is a fact.
Defending that is derangement (in a nice way)
You don't fuel lies. Him being a sht person is one thing. But Russian collusion has not been proven. And the indictments had no bearing on trump as to now.
The way it's going I think it's going to by quite a bit more than a few million.
Then there will be the 70 years of famines.
What proof?
Apologies my mistake.Actually Mo, you have lost the thread I think. You and Wayne had been asking for proof that Russia had interfered in the elections, because I had claimed that by taking no action and in fact trying his best to impeded the investigations he was damaging democracy.
It is only now that they have definitive proof. Proof, by the way, that was obtained while Trump and many in the GOP went out of their way to be as obstructionist as possible to the investigation, even to the extent of requesting the outing of sources.
But now that they have this proof, what does Trump do? Blame the law enforcement agencies while he kisses Putin's derriere.
Your response to that post of mine was: What proof?
So when I pointed to the indictments of Russian agents, you continued to demand proof, but now you are saying that the proof should be of Trump's collusion, something that has not yet been put on the table by Mueller and something that I did not say.
With regards to Russian involvement, the last video I posted has even Trump admitting Russian involvement, though very reluctantly.
What's your thesis? We should support Trump as an ally, but we should also be wary due to his past/nature.
Watch from 2:15
I obviously don't know what it's like, but it seem that when a person is up high enough on that power list, being surrounded by lines of brown nosing aids, the lobbyists, the bubbles, the personal stupidity and self-importance... they all turned into high functioning sociopath.
I'm not defending him. I'm defending his right to not be smeared on made up evidence. There is a huge media bias against him and they are pushing half truths as facts. This fuels twitter/social media and those too lazy to investigate further. Then lies become "fact".
And I'm aware its not just the left.
Its the divide in the population between left and right that will ruin it for years.To be fair Trump has attacked aggressively often in a derogatory manner any thing and anyone who has the temerity to point out any of his failings/untruths/alternative facts or his immoral positions.
His attacks on the 4 estate is extreme by US standards none of which I would rate left wing.
Also when Trump is sitting in some of his cabinet meetings he sits in a body language posture of 'self nurture' - he's 'hugging himself.'
Trump is in a lot of emotional pain. A LOT!!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?