i find your posts very hard to decipher, and am not sure if you are serious in the above post, howeverthinking outside the square....
I say a change of federal govnut will turn everything around....it was looking promising, for a while, that we may have got rid of her....but we will have to wait till after xmas....
to see if thomson is charged....and watching slippery pete, fall off his new throne....or get tossed out
wonder what stopped the slide...in WA, VIC, NSW......yes, labor govnuts were turfed out and the liberals arrived...that explains the low drops of less than 2%.....when the bears were claiming it would be 50% plus
only QLD is lagging and on the nose....but it could have been worse...except for the lingering committment, that the bligh govnut will be gone by March 2012.....
then we just have to oust gillard.....and all will return to normal...with good governance....and happy people
we will get a rate cut in december....whether glenn stevens can handle it or not....
the banks will cut rates, regardless of what the rba says...
enjoy
out and the liberals arrived...that explains the low drops of less than 2%.....when the bears were claiming it would be 50% plus
Please get your figures a little more correct instead of the ramblings.
Nationally -4.0%
Oh dear Melbourne -5.4%
And bears claiming %50+ falls, who on this forum that is still around is claiming or has claimed 50%. You are just as extreme as your so called bears.
Cheers
Kincella, don't think any bears were predicting 50%+ price drops. Steve Keen only predicted a 40% drop and he's the most radical I've heard of.
Guess those FHBs in QLD who lost 9% this year are laughing at those imaginary 50%+ price drop predictions too, hey.
If and when prices do fall, how does everyone think it will affect the economy in general ?
Even with the stagnation / drop so far, a few chippy mates tell me a lot of the people that were looking at buying up, are now just renovating instead, but if prices keep dropping, would you throw money at something that's lost that much value ?
I'm also interested in the labour market, as even if houses drop by 30%, I'm not sure how any one could build a house cheaper than they could buy an existing, and if people aren't building, what happens to all the people the industry employs ?
the same market is the same whether its high or low - so renovating would probably still be a viable option for someone looking to upsize.
If and when prices do fall, how does everyone think it will affect the economy in general ?
Even with the stagnation / drop so far, a few chippy mates tell me a lot of the people that were looking at buying up, are now just renovating instead, but if prices keep dropping, would you throw money at something that's lost that much value ?
I'm also interested in the labour market, as even if houses drop by 30%, I'm not sure how any one could build a house cheaper than they could buy an existing, and if people aren't building, what happens to all the people the industry employs ?
Buying in the down market WINS every time ... example...
your house bought 300K rising to 400K
bigger house bought 500K rising 670K
sold your for $400K paying extra 270K for an upgrade
Same scenario
300K now worth 200K
500K now worth 330K
sold your for 200K buying 330K, you pay an extra 130K for the upgrade
how is it the same?
Unless you have plenty of properties bought cheap, or use your home as an ATM higher price is good for you
but if you just got a PPOR without the ATM component you want the housing market to be cool or outright in a recession as buying, upgrading, moving cost you a lot less
I got a place and I dont mind if the whole market crash down 20-50%
cost me a lot less to upgrade to a bigger place.
provided you own, or almost own your PPOR. for those that have 450k against a (once 500k) now 300k value house, no such luxuryupgrading then costs 150k realised loss plus for examples sake 130k for the upgrade
They already have where I live.people often argue that house prices wont ever fall below the cost to build a new oneim not sure why
When the banks have finished with the appartment developers. My guess is they will be sending letters to the people with $450k loans against $300k properties, asking for more equity. Otherwise they will have to include the $150k loss in their annual results.IMO
thinking outside the square....
oh i'm sorry, i thought this was a housing debate not a labour bashing one. Shall I drop a few points about how the libs royally screwed up?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?