tech/a
No Ordinary Duck
- Joined
- 14 October 2004
- Posts
- 20,513
- Reactions
- 6,757
House prices CAN fall, they HAVE fallen previously and currently ARE falling, and you still preach that they are infallible.
should be able to get some help here at ASF though, with like the ASX down at 4200, must be plenty who have gone through 30-40% falls
http://www.rs.realestate.com.au/cgi-bin/rsearch?a=sp&s=vic&u=ballarat
Looks like some august figures came through Robots. September's will come soon.
Hmm I must be on ignore
Go just to show that there are some affordable homes in Victoria. Makes you think why live in the City.
Cheers
hello,
have to get a security specialist around tomorrow, change the daily routine, check the windows,
get one of those devices to check under the car for bombs
they reckon homegrown terrorism is always the biggest concern
thankyou
professor robots
I'm pretty out of touch with real estate so would appreciate any input re the following situation.
My cousin, aged mid 40's, two teenagers still at school, working as a teacher two days a week, receiving some Centrelink benefits, plus maintenance from ex husband, paying no tax, has only small mortgage remaining on her home in a good part of Sydney (Epping), which agents have said will sell for about $1.3M. It's too big for her and she's
thinking about selling and then buying something smaller to live in plus an IP.
She's bright but inexperienced in investment, i.e. has never owned shares, and revealed in a conversation yesterday that she'd never heard of the sub prime issue and had no idea about the current chaotic state of world financial markets.
She is thinking she could sell now, rent for a year or so, and then find the market considerably lower, at which stage she could buy again.
She says a basic IP unit in Sydney would be around $500K. If that's right, what sort of rental income would it produce?
I've done some very rough calculations on around $500 p.w. which is only about 5% gross, and assumed (on the basis she does not now pay any tax) the tax free threshold of $6000, then 15% on the remaining $20,000 = $3000.
Then there would be council rates and body corporate, plus maintenance and insurance which optimistically all up would be around another $4000. Is this about right?
This would be a net yield of less than 4%.
How realistic is the above?
Wouldn't it also affect her Centrelink benefit?
What have I failed to think of?
I'm concerned that she has a blind faith that property - because it's all she has experience of and even then just that in which she has lived - is necessarily going to be a 'fantastic investment'.
I'd be appreciative of any comments members could offer.
Hi Julia,I'm pretty out of touch with real estate so would appreciate any input re the following situation.
.....
Then there would be council rates and body corporate, plus maintenance and insurance which optimistically all up would be around another $4000. Is this about right?
.....
I'd be appreciative of any comments members could offer.
My cousin, aged mid 40's, two teenagers still at school, working as a teacher two days a week, receiving some Centrelink benefits, plus maintenance from ex husband, paying no tax, has only small mortgage remaining on her home in a good part of Sydney (Epping), which agents have said will sell for about $1.3M. .
Gotta love this country..
$1 million asset, and get centrelink benefits.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?