This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Resisting Climate Hysteria

Jump to new
This is disgraceful bullying and misogyny against a female climatologist.

Leave Valentina alone, you warmist misogynists!

 

Creative Cynic. Very creative.

Of course in this case the judges investigated the evidence around CC and decided that in fact, on the evidence, it was very real and largely caused by human actions.

And then they decided that governments had a duty of care to their citizens to protect them from severe but avoidable harm and were thus under obligation to address the problem.

Just not quite the same as Lucifer as it ?

https://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnew...nning-of-a-new-era-of-climate-litigation.aspx
 

You are correct! The case for the existence of Lucifer has greater merit!

As has been said before, the judges' expertise and training is predominantly legal, not scientific! Their determinations usually depend very heavily on the honesty of those presenting their respective cases.

Before presenting one's case at court, which particular tome is one required to place one's hand over and swear an oath to telling the truth?

And amongst other things, which particular beings does aforementioned tome attest to the existence of?
 
Malcolm Roberts newly elected One nation Senator was on Q & A last night. Not surprisingly he opened up with a flat denunciation of current climate science because "they don't have the empirical evidence".

But the real conspiracy was arguing that all the meteorologist organisation around the world were deliberately corrupting their data to create a totally false picture of world temperatures.

And this guy is in our Parliament


(Excellent video on the link)
 
Another take on Malcolm Roberts inglorious efforts to deny the bleeding obvious.

http://www.watoday.com.au/entertain...with-physicist-brian-cox-20160815-gqt941.html
 
basilio said:
Another take on Malcolm Roberts inglorious efforts to deny the bleeding obvious.
]
Click to expand...



He's a joke and the exposure will help us get to the real task of trying to combat the causes of climate change full on.
 
explod said:


He's a joke and the exposure will help us get to the real task of trying to combat the causes of climate change full on.
Click to expand...

How many times do you have to be told......It is the SUN.....The joke was on the mad professor from England.
 
explod said:


He's a joke and the exposure will help us get to the real task of trying to combat the causes of climate change full on.
Click to expand...

....and, Mr Cox has a public career to protect
 
I know I have posted this before, but it obvious the Alarmist on this Forum have either not bothered to read or decided to completely ignore it.

CLIMATE CHANGE IS ALL ABOUT THE ACTIVITIES OF THE SUN.



New post on cairnsnews.org



WA engineer destroys global warming myth
by cairnsnews



Miranda Devine
Respected journalist Miranda Devine published the article below October 4, 2015, throws engineered evidence supporting taxpayer funded environmentalist empires selling global warming/ CO2 doomsday/climate change Armageddon to instigate damage control protection of their gravy train.
Dr David Evans makes this statement in the video below that is a must view for concerned Australians - “Official climate science, which is funded and directed entirely by government, promotes a theory that is based on a guess about moist air that is now a known falsehood. Governments gleefully accept their advice, because the only way to curb emissions are to impose taxes and extend government control over all energy use. And to curb emissions on a world scale might even lead to world government ”” how exciting for the political class!”

Harry Palmer - sosnews.org

Source: Miranda Devine- Perth Now - news.com.au - October 4, 2015
A MATHEMATICAL discovery by Perth-based electrical engineer Dr David Evans may change everything about the climate debate, on the eve of the UN climate change conference in Paris next month.
A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.
He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.
He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought.
It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says.
“Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it’s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades”.
Dr Evans says his discovery “ought to change the world”.
“But the political obstacles are massive,” he said.
His discovery explains why none of the climate models used by the IPCC reflect the evidence of recorded temperatures. The models have failed to predict the pause in global warming which has been going on for 18 years and counting.
“The model architecture was wrong,” he says. “Carbon dioxide causes only minor warming. The climate is largely driven by factors outside our control.”
There is another problem with the original climate model, which has been around since 1896.
While climate scientists have been predicting since the 1990s that changes in temperature would follow changes in carbon dioxide, the records over the past half million years show that not to be the case.
So, the new improved climate model shows CO2 is not the culprit in recent global warming. But what is?
Dr Evans has a theory: solar activity. What he calls “albedo modulation”, the waxing and waning of reflected radiation from the Sun, is the likely cause of global warming.
He predicts global temperatures, which have plateaued, will begin to cool significantly, beginning between 2017 and 2021. The cooling will be about 0.3C in the 2020s. Some scientists have even forecast a mini ice age in the 2030s.
If Dr Evans is correct, then he has proven the theory on carbon dioxide wrong and blown a hole in climate alarmism. He will have explained why the doomsday predictions of climate scientists aren't reflected in the actual temperatures.


Dr David Evans, who says climate model architecture is wrong, with wife Jo Nova who hosts climate change skeptics blog - joannenova.com.au
Dr David Evans, who says climate model architecture is wrong, with wife Jo Nova, Picture: australianclimatemadness.com
“It took me years to figure this out, but finally there is a potential resolution between the insistence of the climate scientists that CO2 is a big problem, and the empirical evidence that it doesn’t have nearly as much effect as they say.”
Dr Evans is an expert in Fourier analysis and digital signal processing, with a PhD, and two Masters degrees from Stanford University in electrical engineering, a Bachelor of Engineering (for which he won the University medal), Bachelor of Science, and Masters in Applied Maths from the University of Sydney.
He has been summarising his results in a series of blog posts on his wife Jo Nova’s blog for climate sceptics.
He is about half way through his series, with blog post 8, “Applying the Stefan-Boltzmann Law to Earth”, published on Friday.
When it is completed his work will be published as two scientific papers. Both papers are undergoing peer review.
“It’s a new paradigm,” he says. “It has several new ideas for people to get used to.”
Editorial:
Unable to find any peer review for Dr Evans findings does not dismiss those finding. It does however keep the gate wide open for environment engineers and their loyal supporters of the gravy train environmental express.
Further, peer review factor is the current tool of the loony greens which is understandable when they develop climate change doom reports having it endorsed only by capitulating peer review.
Posted 2011 - Dr Evans four fatal pieces of evidence- http://joannenova.com.au/2011/09/dr-david-evans-four-fatal-pieces-of-evidence/
posted 2011 - Unknown climate change supporters opinion to Dr Evans - http://www.skepticalscience.com/david-evans-understanding-goes-cold.html
Harry Palmer

cairnsnews | August 1, 2016 at 11:33 am | Tags: Climate Change Skeptics, Dr David Evans, Environmental Fictional Engineering, government corruption | Categories: Agenda 2030, Climate Change, corruption, environment engineering, Global warming, mythmanagement, New World Order, People Control | URL: http://wp.me/p2dFb5-1YG
Comment
See all comments
 
Just pure and utter rubbish Noco. You clearly don't realise it but that doesn't change the facts.

David Evans long involved treatise has validity only in his mind and the other people subject to his delusions.
 
basilio said:
Just pure and utter rubbish Noco. You clearly don't realise it but that doesn't change the facts.

David Evans long involved treatise has validity only in his mind and the other people subject to his delusions.
Click to expand...

Couldn't the same statement be accurately made of many of the climate alarmists?
 
cynic said:
Couldn't the same statement be accurately made of many of the climate alarmists?
Click to expand...

Oh No Cynic...You are not allowed to do that......The Alarmist are always right and everyone else speaks rubbish according to Basillio????????????????.....No matter what facts you throw up these Greenies they are so brainwashed into believing their masters from the UN that they dare not veer away from the the UN bible......I am sure if the UN told them to put their heads in a fire, they would do so....It is such a shame...I do feel sorry for these people.
 
basilio said:
Just pure and utter rubbish Noco. You clearly don't realise it but that doesn't change the facts.

David Evans long involved treatise has validity only in his mind and the other people subject to his delusions.
Click to expand...

It is very easy to say it is rubbish but you do not give a reason for saying such words.......It is well known the "FACTS" which you keep presenting are distorted and exaggerated and you cannot deny it......To harp on the idea that these so called Climate scientist have their work peer reviewed is all about the amount of money they are paid and they will keep doing it so long as their bank balance increases.

This whole Global Warming scare is a scam.
 
basilio said:
Just pure and utter rubbish Noco. You clearly don't realise it but that doesn't change the facts.

David Evans long involved treatise has validity only in his mind and the other people subject to his delusions.
Click to expand...

Got any FACTS to back this up basilio? This guy is obviously a DUNCE and should be discredited IMMEDIATELY !




http://www.abc.net.au/tv/changeyourmind/s3456871.htm
 
basilio said:
Another take on Malcolm Roberts ..................
Click to expand...

Buried in Roberts crank-mania are the seeds of his own destruction with regard his CC belligerence. I his Q&A performance for a short while he reflected on education and made the direct point to the importance of teaching children not what to think, but how to think. In this all power to his arm; The elevation of critical thinking....

Anybody with this capacity would within a moments thought, see the bazaar nature of a conspiracy theory involving so many disparate and disconnected independent sources all coming to a similar conclusion for some nefarious end that then somehow benefits an international banking cabal, those long term bent is world domination through manipulation of the United Nations. As is Roberts delusion.

Maybe WayneL can point out, privately, to Roberts how Exxon and Koch brothers studies work in these parameters, in aligning with all these other infiltrated scientific research insto's and confirms their findings .... Information your keen to keep close to your chest...
Hang on I know the answer; Obviously penetrated by moles and sleeper agents. This thing just keeps getting bigger...
My god now I see it it's all true . AAAAHhhhhhhhhhhhh.........

Recommended reading on this from 'Catch-22' 344mm Leparge Gun;
http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/180427-they-began-to-invent-humourless-glum-jokes-of-their-own
 
trainspotter said:
Got any FACTS to back this up basilio? This guy is obviously a DUNCE and should be discredited IMMEDIATELY !

View attachment 67784



http://www.abc.net.au/tv/changeyourmind/s3456871.htm
Click to expand...

Too many people on this thread will believe what they want to believe re the causes and reality of global warming.

For those who are interested you can check these detailed breakdowns of David Evans misinformation re CC

http://www.skepticalscience.com/david-evans-understanding-goes-cold.html
https://debunkingdenialism.com/2012...s-in-david-evans-case-against-global-warming/
 

It's nice to know you're thinking of me orr, but you'll have to do better than an intellectual spit wad and lacky band to be anything more than a mild annoyance. Good luck with it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

August 2024 DDD
2 3 4
Replies
75
Views
25K
ducati916
February 2025
2 3 4
Replies
64
Views
13K
ducati916
ZYAU - S&P/ASX 300 High Yield Plus ETF
Replies
0
Views
2K
divs4ever
July 2025 DDD
2 3
Replies
45
Views
7K
ducati916
How do we deal with bushfires in a warming climate?
8 9 10
Replies
199
Views
17K
basilio
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...