Garpal Gumnut
Ross Island Hotel
- Joined
- 2 January 2006
- Posts
- 15,063
- Reactions
- 13,499
Its lame.
How do you determine "low enough"
You need positive expectancy before you do anything.
You then need to understand risk and position sizing.
Start there.
There is much to this business and will take you years and quite possibly a chunk of your funds before you master it.
lAnd yeah I think i have a rough plan about trading, mainly its just observing the fluctuations of the prices, and when I see the prices are low enough, I submit an order for that share.
Then I wait, till it goes back up a bit, not much..in Rio's case maybe a few dollars and then I execute order to sell.
Is it really all that lame if Sweet Classics doesn't want to educate himself about the wider market but just wants to put a chunk of money on one blue chip company?Its lame.
How do you determine "low enough"
You need positive expectancy before you do anything.
You then need to understand risk and position sizing.
Start there.
There is much to this business and will take you years and quite possibly a chunk of your funds before you master it.
Or it could end in tears with poor old sweet cakes suffering huge speculative losses by trying to jump in and out of the market without knowing what she was doing.
It might be just me, But if I had just sold my house I would want to take a conservative approach as to where I was putting the funds. With some here suggesting she even use margin, it's just crazy, she doesn't know what shes doing. Lucky sweet cakes didn't sell her house a few years, Or the sharp salesman from storm financial would have eaten here for breakfast.
"those who fail to remember the past are doomed to repeat it"
Hi, thanks for your input. First of all I'd like to make it clear than I'm not a girl..I'm a dude bro.
?
/a
mate, this is a tired old mantra of yours.
Its makes me think its not valid, a bit like Gann.
Do you have any novel ideas?
gg
Even if I do make a lost in share value, I always have the choice of withholding the sale of shares till the situation improves.?
Secondly, I agree about speculative losses does pose a genuine risk but I also believe by carefully dwelling on local market and global news, price fluctuations as well as all relevant news material concerning the company the risk can be minimized to a certain extent. I recall the GFC was widely and thoroughly covered from start to finish by the media, leaving the shareholders ample time to make decisions on their share holdings.
Even if I do make a lost in share value, I always have the choice of withholding the sale of shares till the situation improves. I'm just a bit clueless on your suggestions of a conservative approach, as I think keeping my margins at the minimum is a conservative approach to make a profit, ain't it?
Hi, thanks for your input. First of all I'd like to make it clear than I'm not a girl..I'm a dude bro.
Sorry I can't aggree with anything you are saying about monitering the news of companies lowers your risk, it takes seconds for bad news to wipe value from your holding, and if you are limited to one company you can suffer a huge loss,
In regards to a conservative approach.
In my view a conservative approach would involve keeping some of the cash in cash investments, while dollar cost averaging a large portion of the rest into an index fund. If you wish to try your hand at investing some yourself then I would limit this to 25% of the total, and spread it accross a minimum of 5 companies that you know well and can be assured you are not over paying for.
May I also such before you invest you $500K, that you invest some time and money into education, not expensive seminars just some good books, the Intelligent investor is good start,
Please watch the below two videos of warren buffetts view about index funds and novice investors, they only go for 2mins
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_WF1NhSGIc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEX81lGhMwM
I agree with spreading out the funds but I think that might be worthwhile once you got a few million in your portfolio, but for an investment of half a mill bucks it won't give any more annual returns than my bank does in interest payments lol.
Is it really all that lame if Sweet Classics doesn't want to educate himself about the wider market but just wants to put a chunk of money on one blue chip company?
The $500K would buy about 5900 RIO shares. Not too hard to buy in a dip then sell when it has gone up two or three dollars. That would be a quick profit of around $12,000.
I agree with spreading out the funds but I think that might be worthwhile once you got a few million in your portfolio, but for an investment of half a mill bucks it won't give any more annual returns than my bank does in interest payments lol.
The above statement by sweetclassics does show his inexperience and lack of education. And correct, too, that he doesn't have what most of us would call a plan.Yes its a lame and immature plan. I wouldn't even call it a plan.
Hi guys, I'm new here too and got a few questions in mind. I sold my house a few months ago for half a mill, and currently I'm keen to invest back that amount into shares, preferably as short term investment for probably a year or two....
Isn't this what most traders do all the time with much smaller amounts, i.e. in at $2.20 then sell at $2.70 etc?
What's the difference other than the bigger dollars?
The above statement by sweetclassics does show his inexperience and lack of education. And correct, too, that he doesn't have what most of us would call a plan.
However, a glance at RIO's chart shows plenty of opportunities where one could have bought in a dip such as you've mentioned, then sold when the SP rebounded.
Agree that sweetclassics' inexperience could well land him in trouble, but the principle of what he's suggesting is feasible.
Isn't this what most traders do all the time with much smaller amounts, i.e. in at $2.20 then sell at $2.70 etc?
What's the difference other than the bigger dollars?
hmmm excuse me but i actually go to uni, so you guys could lay off calling me dumb a lil you know.
hmmm excuse me but i actually go to uni, so you guys could lay off calling me dumb a lil you know.
Anyways just my two cents, tho I'm still keen to hear any constructive arguments and advices. Thanks
And for those saying I'm going to lose everything by putting my money in Rio, well why are so many people buying its shares in the first place if the company's destined for ruins? The mines certainly aren't drying up, and with high rates of industrialization happening all over Asia, I don't see the demand for materials going down either.
One more thing, I'm not against diversification at all, I'm just suggesting I trade one company at a time. Maybe if Rio's experiencing a slump, I'll look into other companies whose prices are actively fluctuating.
Anyways just my two cents, tho I'm still keen to hear any constructive arguments and advices. Thanks
...I'm unemployed, ...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?