- Joined
- 20 July 2021
- Posts
- 13,688
- Reactions
- 19,057
it is more about the efficiency of government rather than size , ( think 'bang for the buck ' rationale )Would I be correct in assuming that the problem that most see with Australia is continuing budget deficits caused by increasing welfare spending (NDIS etc) , reliance on government for healthcare and social services and not enough incentive for private enterprise in entrepreneurs?
This sounds like a page out of the Liberal party songbook, but there are relevant questions about how big government should be, and whether those that can afford to pay for their own healthcare, child care, education etc should be required to do so.
All sorts of issues would arise from these questions, it's the eternal battle of ideology, but us usual the practical considerations are often overlooked and buried under the ideological vomit.
eg split responsibilities in the health and education departments. Maybe the Feds should run both alone and stop the States stealing money for other purposes.our system has major systemic flaws that nobody seems willing to address
they both leak ( taxpayer ) funds but which is more cost-effective , no point culling the most efficient one and empowering the worst offender , i am in favour of disbanding the Federal one and having free competition between states ( and force them to be tax-efficient ) the state voters are closer to Parliament house them , no hiding in ivory offices in remote Australia while the heat is on )eg split responsibilities in the health and education departments. Maybe the Feds should run both alone and stop the States stealing money for other purposes.
Sure , have free competition between States, or better between individual hospitals, but if you want to get the best system nationwide, then you need a central group monitoring perfomance so you can find out the modus operandi of the best performers and roll it out for everyone.i am in favour of disbanding the Federal one and having free competition between states
You should get what you vote for. In a federation such as ours, that means that each state deserves what they get.a few and cr@p for others.
That's one way of looking at it. The problem in my opinion is the State/Federal blame game. If one of those runs the whole show you know who to blame.You should get what you vote for. In a federation such as ours, that means that each state deserves what they get.
In my state, the Labor party refuses to invest in heath; consequently voting these tyrants in results in poor outcomes. (Not that I think the ilLiberals should do better).
Vis a vis, we got exactly what we voted for.
but after accessing nearly every public hospital in the greater Brisbane area in the last 7 years ! what was a public-funded ( by Golden Casket and later Lotto ticket buyers ) and State run has now waned to the extent folks who can't really afford it are accessing private hospitals despite the public systems being directly funded by taxpayers ( via the Medicare levy ) ( had to access private healthcare for a pediatric surgeon despite being on a disability pension , and still haven't met my hematologist yet , despite having been allotted him 5 years back , he just has a rare brief phone call with the GP )Sure , have free competition between States, or better between individual hospitals, but if you want to get the best system nationwide, then you need a central group monitoring perfomance so you can find out the modus operandi of the best performers and roll it out for everyone.
No real point having a good system for a few and cr@p for others.
Would I be correct in assuming that the problem that most see with Australia is continuing budget deficits caused by increasing welfare spending (NDIS etc) , reliance on government for healthcare and social services and not enough incentive for private enterprise in entrepreneurs?
This sounds like a page out of the Liberal party songbook, but there are relevant questions about how big government should be, and whether those that can afford to pay for their own healthcare, child care, education etc should be required to do so.
All sorts of issues would arise from these questions, it's the eternal battle of ideology, but us usual the practical considerations are often overlooked and buried under the ideological vomit.
After spending a week in RPH 5 years ago in the spinal ward, two separate days at Midland Hospital about 2 1/2 years ago and 13 days at St johns Subiaco, the latter two being Private Hospitals, I can honestly say thank goodness I live in WA.That's one way of looking at it. The problem in my opinion is the State/Federal blame game. If one of those runs the whole show you know who to blame.
Ahh, you are talking about a takeover by the wokes?It's certainly a very large problem, but certainly not the largest.
Australia is being systematically, deliberately, destroyed. Absurd welfare spending is one of many strategies being employed. It's so insanely obvious at this point, you can only fail to see it either with a metaphorical blindfold or because you're looking at it from within and can't manage to see things with a rational perspective, which will generally be due to decades of intense brainwashing.
I've already discussed several of the issues in this thread, and others are as obvious as they are too counter narrative to be legally typeable now, and things being illegal to type is yet another serious issue - you've never in all of history had the good guys being this keen to quash free speech and open discussion. Honest people love sunlight, only bad guys want to shut you up, because with full open transparent discussion, the truth comes out anyway.
One of the most obvious issues is that Australia is mass importing low quality people with no hope of becoming production members of society. The scum of other countries' populations they don't want. Australia is stupid enough to take them in so of course other countries will gleefully rid themselves of the worst among them.
Can you imagine, and perhaps you can't, going back anything more than 20 years ago and suggesting that it will somehow be a good idea to import large numbers of people who don't share the culture or national identity, don't want to, and we should give them more legal leeway than native born and bred citizens if they are caught committing crimes including violent or sexual? Can you imagine (and again, perhaps you're brainwashed enough to be unable, not to single you out personally, but probably more than half of Australians are these days, including conservatives to a surprising extent) 20-30+ years ago or any sane person at any time or place in history, not realising this is bad for a country? Right throughout history, countries have defended themselves from invaders because to neglect doing so means your own destruction every time. Police are literally finding any excuse possible to protect foreign crime gangs to the greatest extent they can plausibly deny being deliberate to a marginal majority of the local population.
Sure, massive spending on welfare and things like those jobkeeper or double dole payments etc during the covid years were always going to cause economic catastrophe (I was posting about it on this forum as soon as they announced such insanity), so of course the inflation we've been seeing in the last few years should surprise no one (but so many are stupid enough to still think it was caused by anything other than what it was), but it's not the largest problem. When the government itself works hard to demonise anyone who celebrates Australia Day, the day specifically designed to make people love their country, be proud of it, care about it and want to protect it, and the population is trained to believe that patriotism itself is a shameful thing, it takes some high level insanity not to see that the country is being deliberately destroyed.
When I was a young child and first read The Emperor's New Clothes I completely failed to understand it. When I was a couple of years older to finally understand the concept I was confused and didn't think it could really happen. When I was a little older, still a child, I was horrified to actually observe the phenomenon, but I was well into adulthood before I realised more than a rare few people could be as insane as required to fail to see something as obvious as what's happening in countries like Australia right now, and even less than 15 years ago when I gave up and left Australia I didn't think mainstream insanity could get as extreme as what I observe now.
So, no, you would not be correct in that assumption.
Ahh, you are talking about a takeover by the wokes?
Yes , that is certainly annoying. Identity politics is rubbish, as is political "correctness" and I have said it quite often here, but I think politicians are starting to wake up that excessive immigration is self defeating, even if it's only because it's being shouted at them wherever they go.
Wait till *they think you at end of life, they will try to covertly bump you off as quickly as possible.After spending a week in RPH 5 years ago in the spinal ward, two separate days at Midland Hospital about 2 1/2 years ago and 13 days at St johns Subiaco, the latter two being Private Hospitals, I can honestly say thank goodness I live in WA.
Our healthcare as far as I am concerned is second to none.
yes that has become quite a trendWait till *they think you at end of life, they will try to covertly bump you off as quickly as possible.
now the issue when going non-private is WHEN , not so much the quality of the care ( even in recent times )After spending a week in RPH 5 years ago in the spinal ward, two separate days at Midland Hospital about 2 1/2 years ago and 13 days at St johns Subiaco, the latter two being Private Hospitals, I can honestly say thank goodness I live in WA.
Our healthcare as far as I am concerned is second to none.
Sorry Wayne can't agree with that. When I was in RPH I was in a pretty bad state, physically and mentally.Wait till *they think you at end of life, they will try to covertly bump you off as quickly as possible.
Sorry Wayne can't agree with that. When I was in RPH I was in a pretty bad state, physically and mentally.
Unfortunate as it is no amount of infrastructure can keep up with hordes of immigrants.Just hope you're never going to be one of these people.
View attachment 200091
View attachment 200093
View attachment 200094
View attachment 200095
View attachment 200096
600~1000 people a week are coming to Qld from the southern states, and they're reluctant to spend money on the health care system. Most doctors' surgeries here will not take on new clients because they're overbooked.Unfortunate as it is no amount of infrastructure can keep up with hordes of immigrants.
My own experience though it was an emergency 5 years ago, straight into emergency and a ward at Midland Hospital and by 3pm in an ambulance and transferred to RPH Spinal Unit
Luck of the draw I expect.
That is different to what I was referring to. With my FIL, it was very obvious they were trying to move him along asap.Unfortunate as it is no amount of infrastructure can keep up with hordes of immigrants.
My own experience though it was an emergency 5 years ago, straight into emergency and a ward at Midland Hospital and by 3pm in an ambulance and transferred to RPH Spinal Unit
Luck of the draw I expect.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?