It's reasonable at this juncture to include the fact that the ratings agencies labelled these CDO's Triple AAA so it's not appropriate to lay all the blame on investors who bought those securities.Bad debt
lots of high risk housing loans that went unpaid
The banks could, and in many cases did, foreclose, but the sheer number of sub-prime loans was huge.
foreclosure didn't mean the banks got their money back either
They lent money during a property boom, cost of housing was high, but it isn't high now
Of course, banks being the f***ers they are, bundled up the debt into obscure products, called CDO's (collateralised Debt Obligations) that no-one understood and many investment funds, hedge funds, and even other banks bought into
There's also a good explanation from Sunder on another thread, sorry can't recall the name of the thread now but it was started by Tech/A, something along the lines of "Economic Guru Required". He gives a good picture of just what would happen if credit were to completely dry up.So the banks have a large amount of bad debt, they have screwed investors with their dodgy products, investors are now hesitant to invest in the financial sector, (who can blame them) which means less liquidity for banks, which means a higher cost for intra-bank cost of borrowing, and that in turn creates a capitalisation problem for banks
Moreover, it means that the cost of lending to the consumer (main St) also must increase.
and that staves national growth, because projects that might have been undertaken, are now too costly.
In summery, you now have, banks with large debt, higher inflation in the U.S, higher unemployment in the U.S, many that can't pay their mortgages, higher cost of credit for the banks, higher cost of borrowing for the banks end users, as well as a slowing national growth.
Since then, we have seen banks file for bankruptcy, banks made insolvent, and the general populace do a run on the banks. The ultimate no-confidence vote.
Why wasn't Lehman brothers saved like the other banks?
Lehman wasn't as important as fannie mae and freddie mac. Those 2 banks had approximately 50% of all the mortgages in the U.S.
hope that explains it
Yeah, it's gone largely unnoticed but it is ****e.On that score, I felt a cold chill today when I heard Wayne Swan assuring us that the $4 billion of our money being pumped into the mortgage market "is going into Triple A rated securities". Nasty sense of deja vu was unavoidable.
Hi , wrong thread [perhaps...... question ........ how safe is Bendigo/adelaide Bank viewed bu you guys? recently pulled all funds/savings/deposits out of ANZ and moved to BEN .. i felt more comfortable with BEN after doing a bit of reading BUT would love to hear others opinions in these uncertain times
posted by Julia
It's reasonable at this juncture to include the fact that the ratings agencies labelled these CDO's Triple AAA so it's not appropriate to lay all the blame on investors who bought those securities.
Why on earth would you move from one of the big four to a small player???Hi , wrong thread [perhaps...... question ........ how safe is Bendigo/adelaide Bank viewed bu you guys? recently pulled all funds/savings/deposits out of ANZ and moved to BEN .. i felt more comfortable with BEN after doing a bit of reading BUT would love to hear others opinions in these uncertain times
You may be right. Here is further comment on that.Yeah, it's gone largely unnoticed but it is ****e.
I mean, we clearly aren't light years away if we are bailing out our banks as well!!!!
Clearly the hushing of Malcom was to retain confidence because one of our banks is obviously in trouble, and they are doing everything to hold off a run.
Most likely SUN I think. Not sure if they would be able to give money to WankBest...
Why on earth would you move from one of the big four to a small player???
I do my everyday banking with ANZ but have the large term deposit with CBA.
On that score, I felt a cold chill today when I heard Wayne Swan assuring us that the $4 billion of our money being pumped into the mortgage market "is going into Triple A rated securities". Nasty sense of deja vu was unavoidable.
Absolutely, that's a great point, and one that has been pretty much over-looked to this point. The banks should never have been able to sell their level 3 assets with the ease that they did. Such assets should have had an appropriately low rating. It's fair to say that many investors would never have been fooled if these bank products had been rated correctly.It's reasonable at this juncture to include the fact that the ratings agencies labelled these CDO's Triple AAA so it's not appropriate to lay all the blame on investors who bought those securities.
In America now, many are in the streets demanding "jail not bail"
On that score, I felt a cold chill today when I heard Wayne Swan assuring us that the $4 billion of our money being pumped into the mortgage market "is going into Triple A rated securities". Nasty sense of deja vu was unavoidable.
Why did Lehman's go belly up ?
It's about debt.So can anyone explain in simple terms what this current financial mess is all about.
Anyone
OK, very fair comment.Main reason being lower overseas exposure , mainl;y in house funded ie deposits to loan ratio, ANZ lack of confidence in there investment desicion ability , and just because the big 4 are viewed as the big 4 , does it make them safer ? Seems these days the bigger they are the harder they fall , American pillars falling by the day , i think they were viewed as invincible once upon a time too
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?