I think Lambie has to tread very carefully with Palmer......If she resigns from the PUP she may find she will be replaced by another person of Palmer's liking......maybe his wife......I believe there is some legality that might take place here.
If she is sacked by Palmer, she may have the right to go independent.
I picked this up somewhere from some article...I will try to locate it it.
On 2 March 2012, Prime Minister Julia Gillard announced that Carr would be nominated to fill a casual vacancy in the Australian Senate caused by the resignation of Mark Arbib. This term would expire on 30 June 2014.
Is it the same if she were still to remain a senator, just independent instead of PUP member?If Clive Palmer could have sacked her and retained the senate seat, he would have done so by now. She won't go of her own accord because if Mark Arbib is any guide, she'll lose the seat.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Carr
It's effectively a stalemate.
She can vacate the senate seat and it stay with the party as Mark Arbib did without an election. I'm not sure as to whether she can quit the party and retain the seat.Is it the same if she were still to remain a senator, just independent instead of PUP member?
The question that comes to my mind is why has a so-called mining billionaire has taken such an interest in politics.Of course another alternative is that Clive himself gets fed up and leaves the party, and the rest then elect Lambie as leader.
Stranger things have happened.
I can't see the other two choosing Lambie. They have both criticised her current position of voting against all government legislation.Of course another alternative is that Clive himself gets fed up and leaves the party, and the rest then elect Lambie as leader.
Stranger things have happened.
She can vacate the senate seat and it stay with the party as Mark Arbib did without an election. I'm not sure as to whether she can quit the party and retain the seat.
She hasn't quit the party for a reason.
She said she made a verbal promise to Palmer saying she would not quit the party during her term. She intimated that she would willingly accept Palmer releasing her from this promise.
She said she made a verbal promise to Palmer saying she would not quit the party during her term. She intimated that she would willingly accept Palmer releasing her from this promise.
Ms Lambie doesn't deserve the title of Senator. She is behaving like a stupid teenager. So she votes on legislation which subsequently passes. Then , belatedly, she has a bit of a think about it (read "is subjected to sustained pressure by Labor and the Greens) and so says "oh goodness, I was wrong there, so I demand the parliament junk that legislation so that my hysterical irrationality can hold sway".
What a complete crock.
She needs to be dumped from more than just PUP. My money is on Clive in this particular stoush, much as I detest him also.
What's Jacqui planning ?At one point, she seemed to suggest she would not form her own party, saying "that would be an overload for me".
She said she would spend the weekend in Tasmania consulting her constituents and mentors.
"I'll make a decision from there early next week," she said.
What's Jacqui planning ?
It now seems there's only one choice she can make with PUP.
I can't see Labor showing any interest. She's already declared she'll vote against all government measures in the senate over defence pay. As for the non-PUP independent senators, they should consider that if Clive's money isn't enough to hold her............
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-polit...with-palmer-united-party-20141120-11qbkb.html
Doc, she says she will spend the weekend consulting with the people of Tasmania......Will someone remind her that she is just one of six senators in Tasmania and she is really a servant of the state government and should be consulting with the state government as well as the people of Tasmania....If she continues to make self interest decisions instead of the Tasmanian requirements then she is not doing her job and deserves to be kicked out..
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?