EXT - Excite Technology Services
- Thread starter dwecke2000
- Start date
Sean K
Moderator
- Joined
- 21 April 2006
- Posts
- 23,350
- Reactions
- 13,776
laurie said:I will give you the benefit of doubt no its not the wrong code its the correct code it's trading under deferred settlement DYOR !!
cheers laurie
Laurie, you mentioned AEXDA? This is the EXT thread. LOL 
bigdog
Retired many years ago
- Joined
- 19 July 2006
- Posts
- 8,438
- Reactions
- 6,005
What date is EXTDA expected to start trading following reconstruction?
bigdog
Retired many years ago
- Joined
- 19 July 2006
- Posts
- 8,438
- Reactions
- 6,005
ASX ann march 23
http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20070323/pdf/311m8w74ggvpwg.pdf
Consolidation of Capital
The Company is pleased to announce that the 1:10 consolidation of its issued capital has been finalised resulting in 96,606,484 fully paid ordinary shares now being on issue. The shares are currently trading on a deferred settlement basis under the code EXTDA.
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 deferred settlement will cease and trading will recommence under the code EXT and new holding statements will be despatched.
http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20070323/pdf/311m8w74ggvpwg.pdf
Consolidation of Capital
The Company is pleased to announce that the 1:10 consolidation of its issued capital has been finalised resulting in 96,606,484 fully paid ordinary shares now being on issue. The shares are currently trading on a deferred settlement basis under the code EXTDA.
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 deferred settlement will cease and trading will recommence under the code EXT and new holding statements will be despatched.
yep very simple read the notice it says "Capital Raising"
cheers laurie
Thanx Laurie,
I didn't see the second page...... it's been a long day !!
regards, captjohn
- Joined
- 12 April 2005
- Posts
- 842
- Reactions
- 0
I suspect this is the capital raising for the TSX listing in Canada.
Lets see what the price is.
Lets see what the price is.
- Joined
- 14 November 2006
- Posts
- 43
- Reactions
- 0
These guys were trading under 10 cents for the last several months.. Whats up with the graph on asx.com?!?! (code: EXT) why does it show them at values up to a dollar?????
Sean K
Moderator
- Joined
- 21 April 2006
- Posts
- 23,350
- Reactions
- 13,776
1 for 10 share consolidation. You've been following this closely ironchef....
- Joined
- 14 November 2006
- Posts
- 43
- Reactions
- 0
My mind is elsewhere. Poker machine software doesnt write itself you know!
Prospector
Not a scaredy cat anymore
- Joined
- 18 January 2006
- Posts
- 2,594
- Reactions
- 2
I think this is going to be a real blonde question. Are there 2 EXT's
Does anyone know the price of EXT on 6th February 2007. I sold them on this date for 9c a share, but on looking at this price, unless I am getting my decimals confused, this should be 90c or thereabouts
or is this what Ironchef is on about. Yep, that must be it and coz I'd sold when it happened I havent been checking it. Just hope my accountant can deal with it because it is in my SMSF. I really think the graphs should reflect these things!
Does anyone know the price of EXT on 6th February 2007. I sold them on this date for 9c a share, but on looking at this price, unless I am getting my decimals confused, this should be 90c or thereabouts
or is this what Ironchef is on about. Yep, that must be it and coz I'd sold when it happened I havent been checking it. Just hope my accountant can deal with it because it is in my SMSF. I really think the graphs should reflect these things!
I think this is going to be a real blonde question. Are there 2 EXT's
Does anyone know the price of EXT on 6th February 2007. I sold them on this date for 9c a share, but on looking at this price, unless I am getting my decimals confused, this should be 90c or thereabouts
or is this what Ironchef is on about. Yep, that must be it and coz I'd sold when it happened I havent been checking it. Just hope my accountant can deal with it because it is in my SMSF. I really think the graphs should reflect these things!
If you read post #1586 it explains all ......tomorrow will all be adjusted ......you'll have 10% of your holdings @ ten times the price..... same difference
Extract from the latest EXT Announcement
Ida Dome – Anomaly “D”
Additional ground spectrometry at the Anomaly D area, which is located at the southern end of the
Ida East Trend, has located areas of exceptionally high grades of uranium mineralisation, peaking at
14,081 ppm eU (1.41% eU, or 1.66% eU308)*. The highest uranium grades appear to be related to
calc-silicate rocks in contact with uranium mineralised leucogranites (alaskites). Calc-silicate rocks
are unusually abundant in this locality.
Limited historic percussion drilling carried out in the Anomaly D area in the early 1980’s also
returned significant uranium intersections including:
• 17 metres @ 0.984 kg/t U3O8 (0.098% U3O8)
• 9 metres @ 1.864 kg/t U3O8 (0.186% U3O8)
• 21 metres @ 0.510 kg/t U3O8 (0.051% U3O8)
• 45 metres @ 0.239 kg/t U3O8 (0.024% U3O8)
• 13 metres @ 0.446 kg/t U3O8 (0.045% U3O8)
• 6 metres @ 0.909 kg/t U3O8 (0.091% U3O8)
Ida Dome – Anomaly “D”
Additional ground spectrometry at the Anomaly D area, which is located at the southern end of the
Ida East Trend, has located areas of exceptionally high grades of uranium mineralisation, peaking at
14,081 ppm eU (1.41% eU, or 1.66% eU308)*. The highest uranium grades appear to be related to
calc-silicate rocks in contact with uranium mineralised leucogranites (alaskites). Calc-silicate rocks
are unusually abundant in this locality.
Limited historic percussion drilling carried out in the Anomaly D area in the early 1980’s also
returned significant uranium intersections including:
• 17 metres @ 0.984 kg/t U3O8 (0.098% U3O8)
• 9 metres @ 1.864 kg/t U3O8 (0.186% U3O8)
• 21 metres @ 0.510 kg/t U3O8 (0.051% U3O8)
• 45 metres @ 0.239 kg/t U3O8 (0.024% U3O8)
• 13 metres @ 0.446 kg/t U3O8 (0.045% U3O8)
• 6 metres @ 0.909 kg/t U3O8 (0.091% U3O8)
Sean K
Moderator
- Joined
- 21 April 2006
- Posts
- 23,350
- Reactions
- 13,776
Can anyone please clarrify how they get a reliable estimated ppm reading from a ground spectrometor? Is this usual? Must be some room for error perhaps?? 14,081 ppm!
Kryptonite!!I still dont know what to think of extract. Some great grades there but not much depth on those drills. All depends how widespread it is. Definately looks promising though.
Can anyone please clarrify how they get a reliable estimated ppm reading from a ground spectrometor? Is this usual? Must be some room for error perhaps?? 14,081 ppm!
Isn't that only on the surface stuff? Wouldnt trust that little sentence they put in. Trying to push the price higher by that. I only looked at the drills
