Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

EXT - Excite Technology Services

kennas said:
A But, perhaps getting these Canadian blokes on board will be seen as a good thing. :confused:

UEQ: $23m placement, up as much as 20% on the day
ACB: $15.5m placement, up 20% on the day
So, the chance of up is very high.

These hungry and crying uranium babes always searching Canadian mother for milk, an indirect Canadian invasion.

What's wrong with Aussie fund managers? Should we have a uranium babies fund? How about our super money?
 
x2rider said:
They seem to be gobbling up the money and not producing the results to go with it.

Cheers martin

I think you should read (re-read) over all drill results and lease data very closely.

Day traders and purposeful and uninformed downrampers destroyed this stock and yes it was in part due to the number of shares on issue. But to say "not producing the results" is a vast generalisation and fails to acknowledge the significance of the EXT drill results to date. I would call an average grade of 700ppm poor, nor would I call a target resource (stage 1 only) of 30,000,000 pounds of U insignificant. EXT has results equal to and in a lot of cases far better than other U companies, as stated here in detail.

This is something that just had to be done and will have a positive effect on EXT.
 
one thing...

Significant to note that EXT management is a bit annoyed about certain posters on a certain forum that I will leave nameless (not ASF).

It seems they have indicated a major problem with that site and in the case of EXT they would be right. Not sure if they plan to pursue.
 
Uncle Barry and captjohn, take note, the following types of comments are totally unacceptable at ASF (though I'm sure you can visit other forums for these kinds of posts if you really need an outlet for them) and in my book are down right ramping.

Uncle Barry said:
To have a team like Haywoods promoting your business/Company is surely a winner and implies that EXT is a Company with huge potential

captjohn said:
These international investment syndicates get huge returns(for investors) & it only comes from trading the shares up & up.
And they will use a Uranium junior like Extract as the trading platform..
Haywood securities will also be like a P.R. Company & spread the company announcements around the world.

captjohn said:
will trade the shares ...mostly up !....coz Uranium is the flavour of the decade !

captjohn said:
Haywood have already done their homework & sums before buying in & their Analysts are not mugs....& probably recommended the consolidation.

Analysts are not right 100% of the time. Infact, many are lucky to make 50% of the time. The fact that some investors/analysts are onboard EXT does not make it a sure thing else they'd have just taken it over and made a killing.

All the offending posts have been deleted. Anyone reading this, do your own research. Please lift the standard of posts or threads such as this that are a hive of unsubstantiated codswallop will begin to go on holidays.
 
Once EXT confirm the historical Anglo american holes @ surface it will do well.

Rockingham is right they do have good near surface alaskite uranium grades. From the preso they are targetting about 40mil pounds which is comparable with other TSX's ers. ERN is looking very similar to EXT as well, but thats more granitic uranium mineral. EXT is alaskite.
 
Gents, DoctorJ has made it pretty clear that this thread needs to get back on track with objective discussion about EXT. Let's keep it so. Thanks, kennas
 
It gets me thinking how market paid for WMT & other U babies & EXT didn't catch the train.

I've been holding a long term parcel for a while & I'm still not sure if its a PERFECT bad luck or on purpose that every time EXT starts to get some market interest there's even bad news (placement or whatever), financials come out with non-promising gold production costs, or somehow US market collapses :banghead: ,etc... :D

With the consolidation, I don't see any effect on the SP but does anyone else see behind it that it could be a way to raise more shares in future without major damage.(since consolidation will mean less # of shares)

if that was the case, does that mean that EXT intends on going on spending on all its U projects SOLELY without any partnerships, takeovers, etc... may be strategy was to lower number of shares, allow a space to issue more shares in future as we'll need it to mine all that U in future.

Regardless of any hidden agenda, I still believe that one day EXT must catch up to its peers specially that we're steps ahead already in production plan/time table of others that are worth more while they're still at square 1.

I'm not ramping up here at all, I'm just wondering if anyone sees the comparison between EXT & its peers & notice that may be there's some undervaluation of EXT in comparison to its current prospects/assets & others who have nothing or close to nothing just hopes.

cheers,
 
I just started reading this thread, started to get carried away by the excitement, bit concerned when Hotramper, I mean HotCopper was mentioned, then I realised I was reading march 2006 threads, sorry :(. Feel sorry for those holding 12 months but just goes to show if somethings hot on HC quite often it's not. 10 bagger or 10 shagger? :confused: Send the management a nasty email, they obviously deserve it.
 
ASX ann March 15 ommitted the top 20 shareholders!

I have been an EXT shareholder since March 2005 and not much happens at EXT!

I am curious how many shares the directors have!
-- 100 C class performance million shares to the directors for keeping a gold mine running for 12 months was a joke target!
-- Revenue $5.8 million with GOGS $5.6 million = $0.2 million gross profit.
-- Money for nothing!
-- What $ value did the directors add for the 100 million free shares; looks like $0.2 million GP!
-- The directors should have measurable $ monetary targets in future that can be measured!

EXT 6:58 PM Half Year Accounts
http://www.asx.com.au/asx/statistics/showAnnouncementPDF.do?idsID=00703270
 
"EXT" is now trading as "EXTDA" EXTRACT DEF SET [EXTDA] on stock Exchange as Under Reconstruction

ORDINARY FULLY PAID DEFERRED SETTLEMENT
 
This is going to sound like a dumb question I'm sure - but I'm a beginner so stick with me ;)

I trade using online trading, will they automatically update shares in relation to the consolidation or do I have to sort this out manually?
 
LPA said:
This is going to sound like a dumb question I'm sure - but I'm a beginner so stick with me ;)

I trade using online trading, will they automatically update shares in relation to the consolidation or do I have to sort this out manually?
Automatic.
 
CAN SOMEONE EXPLAIN TO ME LIKE A 2 YEAR OLD, why this stock has done what its done on my chart? Is this the reconstruction?
 

Attachments

  • ext.gif
    ext.gif
    19.5 KB · Views: 121
CanOz said:
CAN SOMEONE EXPLAIN TO ME LIKE A 2 YEAR OLD, why this stock has done what its done on my chart? Is this the reconstruction?

Thought I had to very big humble pie for a moment. :eek:
Consolidation, every 10 shares held becomes one share. Things like this must really confuse charting software. :)
 
Out Too Soon said:
Thought I had to very big humble pie for a moment. :eek:
COnsolidation, every 10 shares held becomes one share. Things like this must really confuse charting software. :)

Everyday is a learning experience, thanks mate.

Cheers,
 
CanOz said:
CAN SOMEONE EXPLAIN TO ME LIKE A 2 YEAR OLD, why this stock has done what its done on my chart? Is this the reconstruction?


LOL.
Reminds me of CUO.
I was thinking should i buy this stock, should i not, hmmmmm, decided not to, this was early last year.... when it was about 3c... then several months later i check it and its 38c and in one day it went up more than 1000% and im saying to all the people that bought it, well done, ur a champion bro, picked a real winner, i shouldve listened... and they were like umm... thanks...

Then i realised it was a 10:1 consolidation :banghead:
 
Top