- Joined
- 14 February 2005
- Posts
- 15,842
- Reactions
- 19,160
Agreed - it was the Chinese authorities which started that one however.No competent virologists believe the wet markets had anything to do with it - just the media nowadays.
It was based on early science reported in the media, not Chinese authorities.Agreed - it was the Chinese authorities which started that one however.
Started out claiming it was pangolins then realised that wasn't really plausible so changed it to bats or possibly US soldiers. It's the comedy show attempts at explaining it which arouses suspicions.
So what's the official CCP line now?It was based on early science reported in the media, not Chinese authorities.
You are just paraphrasing a lot of junk from the media with your views rather than the efforts being made by the global science community. These are these types of views that are fuelling what would be a useless attempt to "investigate" the origin of the virus. It's useless because this has been an ongoing endeavour from the global science community to research its origins, and will continue to be.
In simple terms the graphic below depicts the problem that scientists are dealing with:
"China" does not appear in this graphic.
or, alternatively, Spain was neutral during WW1 and had no censorship. The 'flu was racing through Europe but, bad for morale and all that, was not mentioned by the combatants. Then, armistice and demobilisation, and what do you get!The first report of Spanish flu was from a US army base in Kansas.From there troops brought it to Europe during WW1.The veracity of this I do not know,but it is reported as likely true on the the BBC.Of course we all know why they called it the Spanish flu-because the Spanish royal family were infected.
Not entirely true.The first report of Spanish flu was from a US army base in Kansas.From there troops brought it to Europe during WW1.The veracity of this I do not know,but it is reported as likely true on the the BBC.Of course we all know why they called it the Spanish flu-because the Spanish royal family were infected.
Why aren't we seeking an investigation?The first report of Spanish flu was from a US army base in Kansas.From there troops brought it to Europe during WW1.The veracity of this I do not know,but it is reported as likely true on the the BBC.Of course we all know why they called it the Spanish flu-because the Spanish royal family were infected.
A Virologist mate of mine who has been a tippler at The Ross Island public bar before it was shut tells me that the appearance of Covid under a microscope tells him it is impossible that it came from a laboratory but rather from an animal as did HIV.Why aren't we seeking an investigation?
Millions of people died.
Same with HIV AIDS - millions dead and more dying every day. We need an investigation....
Oh, they didn't start in China.
My bad.
it is impossible that it came from a laboratory but rather from an animal ...
Find a mate who is a virologist and ask her.They are not mutually exclusive. Where do you think testing and analysis of animal originating viruses take place?
Oh, they didn't start in China.
That was the mainstream theory. Seems to be a bit of pushback on that.Find a mate who is a virologist and ask her.
You can tell the difference if you are trained in that field. She had an interesting conversation one night with ole Fauci, and he said the same. He has said it in public. Google it.
gg
You are right: HIV AIDS has so far killed more people than the total of Australia and New Zealand's population, so we are talking tens of millions.No, it doesn't kill hundreds of thousands or close down economies and it's avoidable.
Find a mate who is a virologist and ask her.
You can tell the difference if you are trained in that field. She had an interesting conversation one night with ole Fauci, and he said the same. He has said it in public. Google it.
gg
Do you have a website for your baseless conspiracy theories?What Fauci said in public was that it was not made in a lab. He doesn't think it was brought into a lab and escaped from there either, but he has no evidence to support that belief and it certainly is not an impossibility as you originally asserted.
That is as clear as mud.What Fauci said in public was that it was not made in a lab. He doesn't think it was brought into a lab and escaped from there either, but he has no evidence to support that belief and it certainly is not an impossibility as you originally asserted.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?