Leaving aside true antivaxers, the concern breaks down to risk/reward.
The obvious concern is that the Vax may be more dangerous than the disease.
The equine Hendra Vax is a case in point, it kills many more equines, and causes a crapper load more of severe adverse reactions than those actually affected by Hendra virus.
Hence the class action against Zoetis.
May I remind people of the Thalidomide fiasco of what happens when pharmaceuticals go wrong.
I don't think the great majority of people are anti vaccine but rather anti "safe"vaccine.
When you consider that this virus has a greater than 99% survival rate, and multitudes greater than that when people do not have any comorbidities, the safety of any vaccine must reflect that reality.
In other words a vaccine must have many times lesser effect on humans then the disease, otherwise there is no point to the vaccine.
A vax that is rushed through the process cannot be assures this result, hence the distrust.
The vaccines that you have mentioned in your post do actually reflect this metric, and is the reason for their broad acceptance.
When comparing vaccines to vaccines one must compare apples to apples, not apples to oranges.
Agree re vaccines haven't seen any thing where a case is made for unsafe vaccine deployment not to say it wont happen, I wont be 1st in line along with most I suspect.
The 99% survival rate argument fails to address that's applicable if all hospital required cases are treated and that the system isn't over whelmed preventing treatment for other life threatening conditions.
It also fails to address the longer term implications of the disease that is still largely unknown as there is only around 6 months of clinical experience with the virus.
On a different note re the economy.
The Swedes are repeatedly quoted as the way to keep the economy open compared to its neighbours the numbers now don't back that view.
NYT
"Sweden’s
central bank expects its economy to contract by 4.5 percent this year, a revision from a previously expected gain of 1.3 percent. The unemployment rate jumped to 9 percent in May from 7.1 percent in March. “The overall damage to the economy means the recovery will be protracted, with unemployment remaining elevated,” Oxford Economics concluded in a recent research note.
This is more or less how damage caused by the pandemic has played out in Denmark, where the
central bank expects that the economy will shrink 4.1 percent this year, and where joblessness has edged up to 5.6 percent in May from 4.1 percent in March.
In short, Sweden suffered a vastly higher death rate while failing to collect on the expected economic gains."
"Norway, on the other hand, was not only quick to impose an aggressive lockdown, but early to relax it as the virus slowed, and as the government ramped up testing. It is now expected to see a more rapid economic turnaround.
Norway’s central bank predicts that its mainland economy — excluding the turbulent oil and gas sector — will contract by 3.9 percent this year. That amounts to a marked improvement over the 5.5 percent decline expected in the midst of the lockdown."
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/07/business/sweden-economy-coronavirus.html