Please provide your evidence.
I presented polling data, and data from US government websites which are regarded as credible.
Perhaps you could assimilate the evidence and draw a different conclusion from something you regard as credible.
It seeks an opinion. If you saw information that clearly showed a situation that was significantly worse than previously the case, and noted how comparable nations sat by comparison, then reaching an informed opinion on the question is not difficult.
It's about determining that despite there being information which is freely available and credible (ie. unambiguously verifiable), a large number people are able to disassociate from facts based on political stance.
Without evidence your comments lack merit.The fact that you ask for evidence for such an obvious thing shows how incredibly blinded you are. Your bias is demonstrated. You honestly are unaware that the left has the dominant control over such things? Honestly? Really?
I gave you the clear opportunity to make your point.You're missing the point.
I clearly said it was an "informed opinion." Your doctor or lawyer only give their opinions, but they have reasonable foundation.So now even you call it an opinion, rather than a clear fact, which is the exact point I was making.
Please elaborate.That's what it's attempting to do, and obviously if you're willing to blindly believe and not keen on critical thinking you'll go along with it, but it has failed to do so.
I provided information.... what you are doing here encourages people to join or oppose you, which is exactly what is causing the polarisation.
I have commented on your understanding of science in other threads, and whether you are of any "leaning" does not change valid scientific data.Consider this; I am a qualified scientist, I am on the left side of the political spectrum, yet most people on the left would now consider me to be alt right, and people on the right tend to agree with or at least respect my political views.
A cycle analyst I follow has predicted the same thing.... Interestingly, the prediction was in 2010, that 2020-21 was a time of likely civil unrest.A mathematical model predicts possible Civil War in the US.
A mathematical model predicts possible Civil War in the US.
I don't think the title "civil war" makes sense here. I can't see how the States would split into two opposing groups . However fractures across the society are deep and dangerous.
I've got some appointments and then I will try to clarify what I mean there... It's no easy matter because it's confusing, even for the participants."I'm finding some extreme dissonance in my sympathies between the opposing forces."
WyaneL, I am very simple, can you help me out, what does this mean? KISS theory