Mr Xi may feel comfortable about showing solidarity with Mr Putin because any Western sanctions imposed on Russia will probably have only limited effects on its economic relationship with China. Mr Gabuev says he would expect China to adhere to the legal requirements of any Western sanctions, such as not banking with blacklisted oligarchs. Nonetheless China will find plenty of ways to keep business flowing. Huawei, a Chinese telecoms giant, should be able to sell 5gtechnology to Russia, whereas Ericsson and Nokia, two Western competitors, may be locked out. China’s development banks can lend to Russian enterprises with less fear of running afoul of financial sanctions targeting commercial lending. And the two countries have steadily reduced their reliance on the dollar to settle trade, part of Russia’s efforts to insulate itself from American sanctions.
But there are risks to Mr Xi’s cosying up to Mr Putin. Writing in Foreign Affairs, Jude Blanchette and Bonny Lin of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a think-tank, argue that a “tighter Beijing-Moscow axis would further encourage China’s rivals to balance against it”. That includes Europe, where attitudes appear to have hardened since February 4th. Jens Stoltenberg, secretary-general of nato, on February 15th described the “two authoritarian powers” as “operating together”.
This perception troubles Chinese analysts. Yang Cheng of Shanghai International Studies University says China worries it could be “treated as Russia’s accomplice”. But he says that perception is the product of the imagination of America and its allies. China’s opposition to nato expansion, he adds, stems from empathy for Russia, in the pressure they both feel from the West.
Mr Yang says this “in no way” means that China supports the current developments in Ukraine. But the West’s tendency to view China and Russia as tied together is “dangerous”, he says. “It’s a self-fulfilling prophecy that will turn the world into a dangerous situation that could be colder and longer than the cold war.” ■
Both Russia and China have no democratic system that allows the people to change government
Not that I'm barracking for the Russians, I hope their incursion into Ukraine is another Vietnam war moment for them. I think the current sanctions levelled at the Russians are a double standard. Why didn't the same sanctions apply to Western governments when they illegally invaded Iraq in 2003, shock and awe bombings and again in Afghanistan 2 years earlier. The Americans wanted regime change in Iraq similar to what the Russians want in Ukraine.
Americans lied to the international community about Iraq possessing WMDs to justify invading that country similar to the Russians saying their incursion into Ukraine was a peace keeping mission.
There are a few here on ASF that reckon the US is a undemocratic dictatorship. In particular DB008 is hell bent on overturning the 2020 US election result. Good luck with than one.ACTUALLY some in the US might think the same after the 2020 elections
Both Russia and China have no democratic system that allows the people to change governments,
Some truth in your comments, Iraq war should not have happened. However it did and a murderous dictatorship was removed, and the Iraq citizens given the right to choose their own destiny by cooperation and voting.
overturned ??There are a few here on ASF that reckon the US is a undemocratic dictatorship. In particular DB008 is hell bent on overturning the 2020 US election result. Good luck with than one.
There are a few here on ASF that reckon the US is a undemocratic dictatorship. In particular DB008 is hell bent on overturning the 2020 US election result. Good luck with than one.
what i understand is neither system is working properly , currentlyI think that some just don't understand how the US political system works, and maybe ours as well. Both two very different systems, but everyone's an expert on both.
Could this work:Putin must Go!
AND
He must be GONE in a great hurry!
Has Anybody got any good ideas?
there is a very big chance removing Putin would increase the risk , you have 80 former intelligence officers in the Russian Parliament , so there is a solid chance a replacement could be more hawkish than PutinThere is no other way to avoid a Nuclear WAR here
or In the very near future
Putin must Go!
AND
He must be GONE in a great hurry!
Has Anybody got any good ideas?
Same **** happened when the US took out Saddam—things got a lot worst when he was gone. Better the devil you know…there is a very big chance removing Putin would increase the risk , you have 80 former intelligence officers in the Russian Parliament , so there is a solid chance a replacement could be more hawkish than Putin
and non-military man Medvedev was the one who ordered the tanks into Georgia , so he probably isn't a soft-touch either
careful what you wish for
a power vacuum with that many nukes in the toy-box is REALLY dangerous
what i understand is neither system is working properly , currently
we have politicians when we need STATESMEN ( and women ) , the wrong people have got the steering wheel ( and many would agree the consultants need a new broom through them as well )
True but what gives one country the right to invade another because they don’t approve who their political leader is and how their citizens vote, we can’t force democracy down their throats.Some truth in your comments, Iraq war should not have happened. However it did and a murderous dictatorship was removed, and the Iraq citizens given the right to choose their own destiny by cooperation and voting.
Interesting article in the WSJ over the weekend indicating the fed is now unlikely to bring in the previously expected rate rise in March because of the Ukrainian war. That is why the US market popped on Friday. So my guess is that this week may not be too bad on the ASX as I suspect the market is more concerned about a rate rise than the Ukrainian war.Markets open tomorrow. The Russian stock market will be slaughtered. The financial squeezes on Russia will crimp trade and investment. The situation in Ukraine is (literally...) still explosive.
On the upside there seems to be a wave of euphoria around the world with the plucky defiance of Ukraine holding fast against overwhelming odds.
So which way wlll the markets run? Into the red with fears of widespread economic turmoil or holding fast with positive sentiment around the Ukraine resistance ? Thoughts ? Reactions ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?