- Joined
- 23 November 2004
- Posts
- 3,974
- Reactions
- 851
http://www.theage.com.au/news/Busin...t/2005/02/14/1108229930903.html?oneclick=true
Am I missing something or is this a rip off??
Even accounting for the work needed to get a IPO up and running the reward for the proposers seems out of proportion. Is this normal??
If this is a rip off, should the public be protected or "caveat emptor"?
Am I missing something or is this a rip off??
Even accounting for the work needed to get a IPO up and running the reward for the proposers seems out of proportion. Is this normal??
If this is a rip off, should the public be protected or "caveat emptor"?