- Joined
- 26 March 2014
- Posts
- 20,912
- Reactions
- 13,981
I agree, both are terrible for POTUS
I miss Bernie!
I agree that things need a shaking, but Trump just doesn't have the character for the job. Hillary IS the establishment.....
'Trump will still win,' says professor who's predicted 30 years of US elections - 29 October
Peter W. Stevenson - http://www.smh.com.au/world/us-elec...30-years-of-us-elections-20161028-gsdjf1.html
Last month, the man who's tried to turn vote prediction into a science predicted a Donald Trump win.
Allan J. Lichtman, distinguished professor of history at American University, said the Democrats would not be able to hold on to the White House...So plenty has changed. But one thing hasn't: Lichtman, author of Predicting the Next President: The Keys to the White House 2016, is sticking with his prediction of a Trump victory..
.. His system has correctly predicted the winner of the popular vote in every US presidential election since 1984...
I have prepared my post us election statement already.
"What were the US population thinking this is a disaster for America and the world"
I have released it early because it won't matter who wins. The Statement will apply for either.
Is There Life After Trump?
[Peter Wehner]
Peter Wehner NOV. 5, 2016
With only hours left before Election Day, here’s the painful, self-evident truth facing lifelong Republicans like me: The 2016 presidential campaign has revealed dark and disturbing things about not only Donald J. Trump but also the party that nominated him.
Self-renewal starts — but doesn’t end — with self-examination.
The forces that propelled Mr. Trump’s rise need to be confronted and defeated. It won’t be easy, given that tens of millions of Americans will vote for him and believe deeply in him. But if these forces are not defeated, what happened this year will be replicated in one form or another, and the Republican Party will continue to inflict great harm on our republic.
If Mr. Trump loses the presidential race, as I believe is likely but hardly a sure thing, it will not be enough for Republicans to excuse or ignore his candidacy. It could never have happened unless things had gone terribly awry in the Republican Party. Its political and moral recovery requires Republicans to reverse three destructive trends that have emerged over the last decade.
Very interesting Republican perspective on the fallout from this election regardless of who wins.
Well worth a read.
Peter Wehner, a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, served in the last three Republican administrations and is a contributing opinion writer.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/06/o...-left-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region
______________________________________________
The other articles Peter Wehner as written also offer food for thought.
https://eppc.org/publications/repub...ture-of-the-party-should-ask-these-questions/
Is there is anything liberal in her, tell me.In the 70's she would have been napalming vietnam...So what is she, a corporate slave or a die hard Lefty ?
Here's the final Five Thirty Eight prediction. Let's see how this goes. I think Clinton will win Florida, maybe not NC. Trump needs win both and then MI or PA to have any chance. I don't think Trump has much of a chance.
I have a feeling this is going to be a watershed moment.
The republican core must be really happy they didn't reign in the Tea Party those few years ago.
Funny how Hilary is seen as a captive of Wall Street and the corporations when most of this forum are stock market and corporate apologists, but still hate Hilary.
So what is she, a corporate slave or a die hard Lefty ?
She's a Clinton... they don't have political constraints nor conscience.
Apparently Rudd and gillard "bribed" a Clinton foundation subsidiary with about $300 million of tax payer money. Carbon capture or something. Bill C praised Rudd in a speech he gave not long after the initial funding.Speaking of which, one of the emails released by WikiLeak show a former Clinton aide to John Podesta about Chelsea still complaining while spending the Foundation's money on her wedding, travels etc.
Her mum would ask "who does that" if she weren't the one doing it.
Apparently Rudd and gillard "bribed" a Clinton foundation subsidiary with about $300 million of tax payer money. Carbon capture or something. Bill C praised Rudd in a speech he gave not long after the initial funding.
Anyone else know the story?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?