This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Trump Derangement Syndrome

Anyone joined the dots on all those who would hang Trump for telling fibs, but who, themselves, will roll out fantastic tales of climate change above and beyond the facts of science?
 
Actually Im interested to see if ifocus has a shop anvil for sale.

Yeah it's on my bench but not for sale don't have a forge .............family heirloom along with the handmade ladder
 
Anyone joined the dots on all those who would hang Trump for telling fibs, but who, themselves, will roll out fantastic tales of climate change above and beyond the facts of science?

This is seriously deranged.
 
Anyone joined the dots on all those who would hang Trump for telling fibs, but who, themselves, will roll out fantastic tales of climate change above and beyond the facts of science?
And here I was, trying so hard to pretend that I hadn't noticed that particular correlation.
 
Yeah it's on my bench but not for sale don't have a forge .............family heirloom along with the handmade ladder
Bloody hard to come by and the new ones are shyte.
 
I'd say he does, it was probably cast in the midland workshops by the shop steward and delivered to Mandurah in the workshop truck.


Haha no it was my fathers anvil who was an out and out National/Joh/Liberal supporter I was the odd one out in the family we didn't discuss politics or unions for the sake of family harmony .

One of my ancestors was a union organiser Dad always said I was a throw back to him .
 
My old man was the shop stewart at Dampier pellet plant in 1968, all our family arguments were about cricket, he backed England I backed Australia.
 
It seems David Pecker, Trump's closest ally, has flipped. Should be interesting.

 
It seems David Pecker, Trump's closest ally, has flipped. Should be interesting.


More fake news BS

How's the hammering Crooked Hillary got and still claims of media bias against Trump.
 
What's fake news? And what does your second sentence mean?

When I say "fake news" its meant to be sarcasm as clearly its not.

2nd sentence is about the continued claim by Trump supporters that there is bias against Trump in the media. They cannot see Trumps and his mates brutal use of the media to spew out continuous lies about all and sundry who dare question his behavior or run against him.

When you look at those articles about Hillary apparently written at the bequest of Trump his hypocrisy is stunning even by US political measures.
 
So many Republicans going to jail, who is going to be left to lock up Hillary....

 
You know that both can happen, right?
 
You know that both can happen, right?

It is the case, however Trumps behavior is easily the nearest to an authoritarian regime of any US president in my living memory.
 
It is the case, however Trumps behavior is easily the nearest to an authoritarian regime of any US president in my living memory.
And the media has crossed over the line. Theres a difference to reporting the facts and leading the narrative. That is a lot more dangerous then one president.
 
It is the case, however Trumps behavior is easily the nearest to an authoritarian regime of any US president in my living memory.

Authoritarian regimes don't let the fourth estate do what they are doing.
 
And the media has crossed over the line. Theres a difference to reporting the facts and leading the narrative. That is a lot more dangerous then one president.

You mean like Fox is doing in the US and recently here where media actually become players?.
 
You mean like Fox is doing in the US and recently here where media actually become players?.
Yes, all of them print rubbish. Both sides I don't quote fox for a reason.

Every now and then you get good articles that really investigated the story. But generally you get propaganda or flat out lies.
 
Bob Woodward: 'Too many people are emotionally unhinged about Trump'
David Smith in New York Donald Trump
The journalist, who has now written about nine US presidents, discusses his new book, Fear, and how he believes the media should have responded to Trump

@smithinamerica Fri 14 Sep 2018 06.00 EDT Last modified on Fri 14 Sep 2018 11.20 EDT
Shares 5742

It was, Bob Woodward recalls, “an almost Shakespearean moment”. He and a Washington Post colleague were interviewing Donald Trump in March 2016. They asked how Trump defines power. The then presidential candidate replied: “Real power is – I don’t even want to use the word – fear.”

Woodward recalls that it was like “Hamlet’s aside, turning to the audience to say: ‘This is what’s really going on, this is what it’s really about. I want it to be known but I don’t want it to be known.’ That great ambivalence of the politician speaking a dangerous truth.”

Two and a half years, one presidential election and hundreds of hours of interviews later, Trump’s telling choice of word – fear – was the natural choice of title for Woodward’s latest book, a singularly authoritative portrait of a White House teetering on the edge of a cliff. Whereas other accounts have offered soap opera, this is the presidency as Shakespearean tragedy.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/sep/14/bob-woodward-interview-fear-trump-russia
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...