- Joined
- 2 July 2008
- Posts
- 7,102
- Reactions
- 6
“godbothering pugilist”
“Abbot is one bloke I would never vote for”
“No to Tony Abbott”
“Can't stand Abbott as a person”
“Couldn't vote for anyone stupid enough to believe in the 3 books God”
“I dislike Abbott too”
“Wife is a dye in the wool Liberal hates Abbott with a passion”
“I can't stand Abbot”
“I've always disliked Tony Abbott”
“Him and Howard go hand in hand and not my cup of tea”.
Malcolm Turnbull
"He was a merchant banker and managing director and a partner in Goldman Sachs."
Did anyone know that? and he is worth 178 million?
Ah! He must be the right man for the job then, if all the usual suspects can't stand him.
Yes Calliope, you are right. The Labor Party knives are out to ridicule and discredit Abbott when ever they can. IMHO opinion Rudd is starting to worry. I don't believe Rudd likes what's going on and that's reason for the dirty tricks. Hope it backfires on the B^@*t*?ds.
At least the liberals are getting a lot of media coverage I suppose. Has not been much coming out of the labs in the media. .
Noco, if Abbott had the taxpayer funded resources to employ a team of spin doctors and media advisers like Rudd has at his disposal it would be a more equal contest with Abbott the likely winner.
As it is, he has one hand tied behind his back. But what he has going for him is that he has Australia's interests at heart. Every action of Rudd's can be seen in the light of Rudd's megalomania.
Labour dont need to say a word .......Let the liberals dig there own hole in the media circus with all this in party fun and games .. LOL what a joke ......
Currently liberal looking like they couldnt organise a piisup in a brewery let alone run a country.
Perhaps because Abbott has made his views about e.g. abortion very clear in the past (perhaps when he didn't anticipate being Leader?).So why is it that the press, and various other commentators think that Abbott is a meddling godbotherer who will bring his religous beliefs to work? But krudd is not and is OK. Methinks they are hypocrites. A touch of bias perhaps.
I think a lot will depend on what sort of plan Abbott can come up with in the New Year to appease the climate change enthusiasts. If he can produce something which seems to deal with what is perceived as 'the problem', without all the obvious disadvantages of the Rudd ETS, he will be halfway there.Noco, if Abbott had the taxpayer funded resources to employ a team of spin doctors and media advisers like Rudd has at his disposal it would be a more equal contest with Abbott the likely winner.
As it is, he has one hand tied behind his back. But what he has going for him is that he has Australia's interests at heart. Every action of Rudd's can be seen in the light of Rudd's megalomania.
I would not under estimate Abbott as he is more interllectual than he looks. Who needs spin doctors when one can tell the truth and that I believe will beat Rudd's spin any day. So many people are beginning to realize that spin leads to lies and you have to have a good memory to be a good liar.
I have to laugh at this spin about Kevin Rudds spin doctors versus Tony Abbotts "truth will shine through". John Howard and his team (including Tony Abbott) had the biggest budget ever about every government innitiative you could imagine and the money they threw away trying to push "Work Choices" would make Kevin Rudd look like a tight fisted Scot.
Currently liberal looking like they couldnt organise a piisup in a brewery let alone run a country.
Rubbish. Howard and Abbott are amateurs in the spin department compared to spinmeister Rudd.."
I agree. He refuses to appear on "The Insiders". Going on the Rove type programmes is all part of his carefully designed strategy to appear to be 'the ordinary bloke', good for a bit of fun etc. It's in the same category as the way he apparently by mistake dropped some swear words, and spouted that rubbish of "fair suck of the sauce bottle" or whatever the expression was and which he apparently even got wrong according to experts in colloquialism.I have to agree with this. Rudd has brought the game of spin to a new level.
IMO any PM that has a preference of going on Rove or a morning show, rather than having to face questions from credible news channels, is a bit suss in my books.
I'm definately no Rudd fan, but if you don't think Howard was close to his euqal in terms of spin I'm not sure how closely you've watched Howard during his tenure.Rubbish. Howard and Abbott are amateurs in the spin department compared to spinmeister Rudd. Rudd has spent record amounts of taxpayer's money on "consultants."
Yep, pretty tame and calculated isn't it? I did watch him on CNN yesterday, interviewed by another Australian, so hard to see the true Rudd. But, I do remember watching him and Joe go head to head on the 'old' Sunrise program and I think they were pretty good rivals, and friends. There wasn't too much spin then and it was good to watch. That was a while ago though...I agree. He refuses to appear on "The Insiders". Going on the Rove type programmes is all part of his carefully designed strategy to appear to be 'the ordinary bloke', good for a bit of fun etc.
Currently liberal looking like they couldnt organise a piisup in a brewery let alone run a country.
He got that right. I can see the unions mounting a massive hate campaign against him.We're going to have to run a peoples' revolt campaign because we won't have much money. The big corporate donations, the massive union donations will all [go] to Labor.
He got that right. I can see the unions mounting a massive hate campaign against him.
Abbott talking to Alan Jones:
He got that right. I can see the unions mounting a massive hate campaign against him.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?