- Joined
- 21 June 2009
- Posts
- 5,880
- Reactions
- 14
why are we in such a mess?
Dr. Albert Bartlett's Law's of Sustainability
15th Law
"The chief cause of problems is solutions"
(Eric Sevareid's Law 1970)
countries that avoided recession.....apart from oz??
if the libs were so hot why didn't they see the bubble they were forming?
check it out
http://www.debtdeflation.com/blogs/
ROFL ........ so the Libs are in trouble cause they reduced debt? Canada did the same.
What bubble ?? I am still waiting for the crash from the last 4 years of prediction. Go to the "Austrlian Property Prices" Forum for some sparkling information that will whet your thirst for knowledge grasshopper.
“If the Treasury were to fill old bottles with banknotes, bury them at suitable depths in disused coalmines which are then filled up to the surface with town rubbish, and leave it to private enterprise on well-tried principles of laissez-faire to dig the notes up again … there need be no more unemployment and, with the help of the repercussions, the real income of the community, and its capital wealth also, would probably become a good deal greater than it actually is.” Chapter 10 of "The General Theory" by JM Keynes.
To his credit, Keynes thought that burying money and digging it up was a desperate remedy meant only for an economy in which productive activity had almost ceased. It was the kind of emergency measure that should only have been contemplated during a slump like the Great Depression.
Unlike Lord Keynes, Mr Rudd clearly believes that activity that would not normally be justified is worth funding even in an economy that’s growing quite strongly. Since the Global Financial Crisis struck in September 2008, Australia has experienced just one quarter of negative growth. In Australia, there has been a slowdown not a recession. Mr Rudd wants people to believe that he is responsible for this. He wants them to think that he’s the economic genius who saved Australia.
Google "Pink Batts" for your answer kiwichick. Also do a bit of research on Steve Keen and his walk to Kosciusko for good measure. Have a nice evening.
trainspotter; here's that info on Steve Keen you were looking for
http://rwer.wordpress.com/2010/05/13/keen-roubini-and-baker-win-revere-award-for-economics-2/
enjoy
You think so? Getting rid of Abbott would guarantee them a win at the next election.Andrew Robb confessing he wants Joe Hockey's job will test Tony Abbott's mettle this week. Also has taken some of the shine off Julie Bishops grab for power. The Libs are in self destruct mode ATM.
You think so? Getting rid of Abbott would guarantee them a win at the next election.
Robb is actually a capable Minister, he just has the charisma of wet cardboard. Hockey is immensely likeable, he's just not that bright compared to his peers.
Libs have a chance of going for substance in a shake-up and if they do, I doubt that Labor have enough talent in their ranks to match them. They'll probably just stick with hypocrite Abbott in the short term though.
You think so? Getting rid of Abbott would guarantee them a win at the next election.
Robb is actually a capable Minister, he just has the charisma of wet cardboard. Hockey is immensely likeable, he's just not that bright compared to his peers.
Agree about the charisma factor. Zilch with Mr Robb. I know he's frequently referred to as very capable, but I'm unaware of how or in what role he has demonstrated this?You think so? Getting rid of Abbott would guarantee them a win at the next election.
Robb is actually a capable Minister, he just has the charisma of wet cardboard.
Agree. His political instincts are sometimes quite off the mark, too.Hockey is immensely likeable, he's just not that bright compared to his peers.
Well, having just dismissed the obvious alternatives of Robb and Hockey, who could they turn to? There is some pretty reasonable talent coming up, e.g. Greg Hunt and Scott Morrison, but they're nowhere near leadership material at this stage.Libs have a chance of going for substance in a shake-up and if they do, I doubt that Labor have enough talent in their ranks to match them. They'll probably just stick with hypocrite Abbott in the short term though.
...So it comes back to Turnbull. Sails has raised valid objections to him.
Perhaps we will never know the real Malcolm Turnbull. He has to perform a fine balancing act. If he hadn't been elected in Wentworth, he would never have been in parliament. Now Wentworth is an electorate, where , in the absence of Turnbull, it would elect a Green.
He has to perform a juggling act. He has to try to persuade the conservatives that he can be trusted, and at the same time convince his electorate that he is one of them.
Being two-faced is not an easy game to play. Sooner or later you have to show your hand.
This Newspoll from the Australian is showing labor well behind on primary votes and falling on the two party preferred. 2PP was based on prefenence flow at the last election which may be very different if the libs put the greens last as they did in Vic:
PRIMARY VOTE+ COALITION LABOR GREENS OTHERS
Newspoll 4-6 February 2011* 44 32 14 10
TWO PARTY PREFERRED+
Based on preference flow at August 2010 Federal election COALITION LABOR
Newspoll 4-6 February 2011 52 48
More info here: http://www.newspoll.com.au/image_uploads
/110202%20Fed%20Voting%20Intention%20&%20Leaders%20Ratings.pdf
Opposition Leader Tony Abbott has conceded the coalition went too far in criticising the government for paying for Christmas Island shipwreck survivors to attend family funerals.
Coalition immigration spokesman Scott Morrison was blasted for saying it was unreasonable to expect taxpayers to foot the bill for flying 22 family members from Christmas Island to Sydney for Tuesday's funerals.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?