This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

The Turnbull Government


Didn't they hold it to the 23.7% that Howard left them?
 
Although broadly in agreement with you Doc, if you mean hiking the rate of the consumption tax (GST), I think this unfairly disadvantages the lower socio-economic population, and undermines the progressivity of the tax system. A GST is ok, but not if it becomes the path of least resistance for tax reform.
 
Total increase of pop (inc births) was around 388k.

That is spot on, so population growth of over 1,000 people per day, someone has to supply the housing stock required.
I'm sure the Governments, aren't that fond of doing it.
 


What!!! Spending has increased under LNP not to mention those two lucky mugs Howard / Costello election buying middle class spending.
 
I'm not in favour of hiking the GST rate, only broadening the base to make it simpler. If the base is broadened, the rate can be reduced to ensure the GST tax take is not increased or a broader approach could be taken with an increased GST take being used to replace other inefficient taxes.

It's fundamentally simpler to achieve tax progressivity through marginal income tax/welfare than through a consumption tax such as the GST.
 
No bums on seats in Oz bricks and mortar.

Good. It seems to make a nonsense of "sack all the public servants we can" policy and then find out that they can't deliver the services any more.

What a surprise.
 
Good. It seems to make a nonsense of "sack all the public servants we can" policy and then find out that they can't deliver the services any more.

What a surprise.

U-turns are the new iron fist governance of whatever it takes for votes.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...