Tisme
Apathetic at Best
- Joined
- 27 August 2014
- Posts
- 8,954
- Reactions
- 1,152
More drivel my son. If you took the time to actually research the subject you would know I am 100% correct.
As the post by Smurf indicates for most marriage no longer has those theological meanings. Slavery to was a tradition at some point that people thought they had a right to.
And this dribble is part of the reason so many gays kill themselves. There is no scientific evidence that being gay is a choice as you suggest. https://www.livescience.com/50058-being-gay-not-a-choice.html
The whole science community looks forward to you peer reviewed paper into your groundbreaking discovery. Not sure how the science community has had it wrong for so long. Unless of course you don't actually have proof.More drivel my son. If you took the time to actually research the subject you would know I am 100% correct.
The whole science community looks forward to you peer reviewed paper into your groundbreaking discovery. Not sure how the science community has had it wrong for so long. Unless of course you don't actually have proof.
Nonsense you don't talk for the scientific community. There are many scientific, peer reviewed papers that all say the same thing:
1) there is NO genetic proof of homosexuality
2) there is NO congenital proof of homosexuality
I'm sure you have all the right reasons for your your crusade, but the truth is the truth and you cannot and will not find any facts to the contrary of my statement. You can suppose anything and you can try to use presumptive axioms as a basis of proof, but that premise is wrong.
Honestly, although I'm obviously rattling chains, the truth is what I'm saying. This is why the whole plebiscite debate is a conscience one, rather than an anatomical one.
As my link before indicated, contrary to your belief there is no scientific proof to suggest that people choose to be gay. You are absolutely correct that atm there isn't a scientific proof into the cause of homosexuality, but to suggest that it's a choice is something the scientific community do not support. Anyone who thinks a conscious choice takes place has rocks in their head.
Choice is a very subjective thing and your idea of choice may well be different to someone else, but at some time in anyone's life the opportunity presents itself to act out erotic urges. Some act on it, others discipline themselves against it, some procrastinate, some abstain their whole lives ........ all make a choice.
As my link before indicated, contrary to your belief there is no scientific proof to suggest that people choose to be gay. You are absolutely correct that atm there isn't a scientific proof into the cause of homosexuality, but to suggest that it's a choice is something the scientific community do not support. Anyone who thinks a conscious choice takes place has rocks in their head.
I think it's mainly a hormone imbalance, but social engineering that homosexuality is "normal" might tip the balance in some cases.
I've always wondered what would happen if scientist were able to find a way to correct this possible hormone imbalance or gene. Would people take it up? Should parents be given the right to alter this gene in the embryo?
Choice is actually quite basic, it's a conscious process. Do you believe that people choose to be gay by a conscious process?
I think it's mainly a hormone imbalance, but social engineering that homosexuality is "normal" might tip the balance in some cases.
Does anyone know that if marriage equality is granted whether that allows them to adopt children? Is that part of it?
ok.They already can.
An unconscious decision isn't a choice. You're really deflecting here, do you believe that being gay is a conscious choice that someone can control?That's a fundamental hurdle you are not overcoming. Choice is both conscious and nonconscious.
the unconscious decisions are processed much faster and in vastly greater magnitude than the conscious decision making. The conscious decision making is like a serial bus, while the nonconscious is like a parallel bus.
ok.
Seems like we have this the wrong way around then. Marriage - no harm that I can foresee. Adoption - ?? Could cause enormous harm, imo. What child would choose to be deprived of a mother/father?
ok.
Seems like we have this the wrong way around then. Marriage - no harm that I can foresee. Adoption - ?? Could cause enormous harm, imo. What child would choose to be deprived of a mother/father?
An unconscious decision isn't a choice. You're really deflecting here, do you believe that being gay is a conscious choice that someone can control?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?