This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Religion IS crazy!


Infinity has always fascinated me, the mind cant really comprehend it, the mind must see ends to things structures, the concept of never ending space cant be truly imagined.
It must go on forever, otherwise there must be an end ...but what would be beyond that, there cant be a wall ....there cant be an end.

( I think I just repeated what you said)
 

Yeh exactly, you begin to see just how restricted the mind is. All it can do is conceptualize (as opposed to realize).
 
Religious Police ?!?!?!? ....what kind of a f**ked up country is Saudi?

 
Man, If only I had a proper adjudicated face to face debate with you. I would have a field day and rip you to shreds!!!

No, you wouldn't, Pav, because you don't have anything to debate with. You keep saying the same thing over and over again and you have not a shred of evidence to back up your claims (the bible is not "evidence" of a deity who orders our lives) whereas the body of evidence supporting evolution is staggeringly huge - and growing all the time.

Such a debate would be embarrassing in the extreme - for you!
 
The religion of peace strikes again!

NIGERIA: MILITANTS KILL STUDENTS IN COLLEGE ATTACK


http://bigstory.ap.org/article/nigeria-militants-kill-students-college-attack
 

Careful ...

You'll give yourself a "mental hernia"!! :
 
What are your views on this?

My view, if he doesn't want to get the blood transfusion, so be it....



Jehovah's Witness teen loses appeal over life-saving transfusion




http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/jehovahs-witness-teen-loses-appeal-over-lifesaving-transfusion-20130927-2uib6.html#ixzz2gPm1tQcs
 
I don't envy anyone making a judgement on this. If he were an adult I'd be right on his side. But at 17 he has a lot of maturing to do, and is likely very much influenced by his family. Tough on them too. Hard to imagine that any family will choose their religion over a chance of their child living.
 

At the end of the day an adult has the right to refuse a transfusion or any other medical procedure. However, by virtue of the fact that one goes to a medical professional for help implies a duty of care on the health professional to keep him alive.

I reckon the doctrine could be worked to establish child abuse in cases like this. The gist of the JW reasoning is based in religious grounds, but based on long out dated interpretation of the ancient texts, antiquated science and medical procedures.

Child abuse could be established if the court was satisfied the parents religious beliefs, which as I understand are based on incorrect interpretation of ancient text and antiquated medical procedures... ie that their belief is ignorant of those facts as they are better understood today and therefore negligent.

It seems to me that whereas a conscientious objection is more on the grounds of freedom of belief, JW religious objection is likely more grounded in false belief from those texts and antiquated medical information, which could open the door for child abuse.

The distinction is subtle but potentially significant in terms of a child abuse or neglect.
 

He has the right to refuse a blood transfusion.
Anyone who refuses a life-saving blood transfusion on religious grounds has been so brainwashed by religion that he/she is not thinking rationally. Ditto for anyone who on religious grounds regards a life-saving blood transfusion as ‘akin to rape’.
Maybe if the bloke knew what it was like to be raped (I don’t, incidentally) he would never have made such a bloody silly statement.

This JW practice of refusing blood transfusions is about as ridiculous as the formerly Amish bloke I saw on an ABC docco today. He’s given away the Amish religion and changed over to some other religious crowd who are almost as fanatical as the Amish.
He and his pals in his new religion were demolishing a perfectly good house with the intention of rebuilding, because apparently the bible says that if a house that’s been locked up for ten days develops mould inside, it’s unclean and must be torn down and replaced.

Religion sure does make some people develop absurd attitudes and do some crazy things.
 
I know this discussion is ancient history now, but anyway ...

Empty space can be infinite, that concept is not too difficult to understand.

But if we accept the Big Bang, and assuming space is linear, then the region occupied by matter is probably not infinite. There should be furthermost stars, dust particles, whatever, which would define the outer limits of occupied space in our universe.

Then again, if space is curved in on itself like a sphere, I dunno what happens then.

What is more intriguing is that the really smart boys are now suggesting that hard, solid matter is made up of strings of energy ... which begs the question ... what is energy made up of???

And, instead of just one universe, they're suggesting that there are many universes, interwoven with each other in dimensions (outside of the four that we know and love) that we can't yet even comprehend!

If they're correct, then the "planes of existence that non-earthly beings populate" that GB talked about become a distinct possibility.

And if there's a universe where energy strings have combined differently to make intelligent life forms (that we think of as "spirits" or "souls"), then maybe there is a hierarchy with a supreme leader ... God.

Since we know so little about our own universe, and there are possibly many unknown unknowns, it's worth keeping an open mind on this stuff. But when GB starts talking about reality being imaginary, etc, my brain starts to hurt!
 
Since we know so little about our own universe, and there are possibly many unknown unknowns, it's worth keeping an open mind on this stuff.
Where scientists may form many a hypothesis about existence and the universe, the religious postulate that not only does a sky God exist but that their particular version of this imagined God is the only correct one. The penalty for not believing this faith based nonsense is some version of eternal hell and perhaps even death for blasphemy in this life.

If you're suggesting that the religious should be more "open-minded" about the possibility their magic books on mythology are fiction then that would mean they must be open to questioning their faith. For most that's just to much to ask since to do so in earnest is just to confronting once they come to recognize that the core of what they believe constitutes nothing more than wishing thinking and a grand deception that enslaves the minds of millions of gullible worshipers.

There is no comparing the pursuit of knowledge by application of reason and the scientific method to the dictates of religion. One produces human progress while the other only the establishment of dogma and metaphysical nonsense masquerading as knowledge. Hitchens was right, religion is poison for human society.
 
There is no comparing the pursuit of knowledge by application of reason and the scientific method to the dictates of religion.
I agree with some of what you said, but I disagree with your generally harsh view of religion!

I agree that some of the teachings of the established religions are rubbish, and certain religions are worse than others and I certainly don't endorse everything that the churches/mosques/etc. teach ...



But religions are businesses, and they need customers, so some of their rules are designed to increase their market share. But that doesn't necessarily mean all religions are completely rubbish.

Many people gain significant peace of mind and comfort from their religion and it helps them deal with life's tribulations and maintain their optimism.

Most people want a simple explanation for what life is all about and are not interested in, or can't cope with, anything too sciencey. Religions attempt to provide simple explanations that such people can accept, unfortunately not always successfully, and I think even God might say to them, "Look, I gave you a brain, now USE the bloody thing!".

Some "humans" behave barely above animal level and need simple-to-understand rules to keep them in line. Religions provide simple rules to live by, many of which you would probably agree with, unless you think that murdering, stealing, adultery, cruelty, etc is acceptable human behaviour. Some religions are better in this regard than others!

Much excellent charitable work is done by religious people, more than by atheists, and many unfortunate beings have food in their stomachs and beds to sleep in because of religions. Hitchens is wrong! He is the poison.

But my point was that our universe/universes seems much more complex than most people have been led to believe and they should not rule certain things out just because they sound ridiculous. We don't have all of the answers yet, in fact, we know very, very little. I suspect that many people believe: Big Bang -> stars -> planets -> pond slime -> US! ... all questions answered! ... Wrong!!!
 
I've seen other reports detailing some of this case and it would turn your stomach. There is no punishment strong enough for this maggot and I would support releasing an appropriate grade nuclear bomb on these people to try to eliminate them from the face of the earth.


http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-10-...d-8-years-for-raping-killing-daughter/5010380
 
Saudi Arabia's Women Driving Ban: Doctor Dismisses Cleric's Claim That Driving Hurts Ovaries


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/30/saudi-driving-ban-ovaries_n_4016957.html
 
Saudi Arabia's Women Driving Ban: Doctor Dismisses Cleric's Claim That Driving Hurts Ovaries

And there i thought it was the increasing levels of literacy and education that was causing the western world to have declining birth rates, when it was women getting behind a car wheel. :car:

I wonder what the cleric thinks driving does to a man's testes :dunno:
 

Or a women passenger?

Saudi - still in the dark ages
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...