tech/a
No Ordinary Duck
- Joined
- 14 October 2004
- Posts
- 20,511
- Reactions
- 6,751
tech/a said:chris 1983
Ever heard buy the rumour sell the fact.
Its simply a discovery nothing has been implemented there are no profits at this time and may not be for sometime---Government regs--infrastructure---a long long way to go in BOTH cases meaning CDU as well.
Simply the market doesnt agree with you all.
It will move sideways for 2 reasons.
(1) There are many caught buying at the top and the really silly ones adding on the way down.Everytime price rallies it will be sold into.
(2) The second group will be those who bought well and held through the downturn looking for it to reclaim highs---after a fair period of time patience will run out for these traders and they will dump into any rally.
When you clear all these out then the stock could slowley rise.
Id say 6-12 mths before sustainable new highs.
johnmwu3 said:This weekend someone may comment PMH should be priced $25 according to the ground value of its reserve, how do you think about it?
How do you think about CDU ? from 50c to $10 in one month ?
So next week people will crowded in to buy at 80c PHM.
How is AGS from 30c to $1 ?
The silly thing to do is buy high sell low. If you paid to much just hold. There's clear evidence based on the recent release that this company is still tremendously undervalued, if you need to hold for years then so be it.
That is why I do not use stops. There's no way I'm gonna sell and lose money on what is potentially a ten bagger!!
Even if it closes at 35c today I will hold.
tarnor said:Realist this is completely the wrong way to trade and will just lead to disaster imo, particuarly if you're buying on news spikes. Take your losses quickly, let your profits run..
While you're waiting to get your money back you're missing opportunities elsewhere..
edit| or were you making a joke and i missed the humour
tech/a said:Realist.
Hey I hope your right for your sake hope I have found isnt a reliable analysis tool.
tech/a said:Realist.
A Buffet Prodigy at his best.
Buffet would be rolling his eyes in disbelief---your company hasnt even turned a sod of soil.
Hey I hope your right for your sake hope I have found isnt a reliable analysis tool.
kennas said:I'm on this now too. Just had a 3rd read through the ann and it's pretty compelling. The thing that strikes me is that further upgrades to the resource are very possible. Could be a 1 billion tn ++ resource at good grades. Also, love the fact that the consultants who have completed the JORC estimate seem pretty experienced. Can't see this been halved like the CDU one. Can only get better by the look of it.
YOUNG_TRADER said:Hi guys, I haven't read all the posts but it seems everyone was drawn to this stock after the release of Ann Mason upgrade,
PMH was formerley Pacific Magnesium (going back 3yrs) I watched them transition into the PMH they are today taking control of the Ann Mason deposit etc,
I would just like to make this point, there are quite a few large global deposits of copper, those that are already operating and literally hundreds of discovered large tonneage low grade deposits, they key is that the grades must be high enough and the deposits must be shallow enough to set that deposit aside from the 'pack' so to speak,
Most would be aware that taking a deposit from an inferred jorc to a BFS is a 2-3 yr process (Just look at IRN's Huge Multi Billion Tonne Deposit) and alot of fundign is required along the way,
So without really commenting on PMH, I make the following suggestions,
Try and ensure that a spec resource company is
a) Well funded or supported ie via a JV (ie IRN has Xstrata maybe)
b) deposit is of a reasonable grade (differs for different commodities) ie close to 1% for Cu
c) Even if deposit is close to 1% Cu it must be near surface and contain very few impurities to make extraction economic
d) Low grade deposits must be close to infrastructure, if not they must be really large to justify Cap-Ex (ie GCR low grade but near infrastructure)
Good luck to all
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?