Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Love a conspiracy theory?

Jump to new
carmo said:
Not sure it is "comprehensive", maybe coincidental ?
Click to expand...

Let's say a comprehensive set of coincidences if that makes you happier ;)
 
Re: Did they really go to the moon and walk around?

I have heard people say the moon landings were fake. Considering they are planning to go to the moon about ten years later why don't they just use the same design and go now? 60's technology did it why not use 90's technology etc?

What do you think?
 
Re: Did they really go to the moon and walk around?

It's Snake Pliskin said:
I have heard people say the moon landings were fake. Considering they are planning to go to the moon about ten years later why don't they just use the same design and go now? 60's technology did it why not use 90's technology etc?

What do you think?
Click to expand...
Over the years I have always doubted the moon landings. If it was so easy then why haven't they been back.
Then again, if they didn't go why hasn't someone spilled the beans by now to get the lie off their conscience. That took away some of the doubt.

But if it was so easy for the americans to do it, why haven't the russians followed. The first to set up a base there would have a great advantage in a military sense. That brings back some of the doubt.

Movies can be made to look so real. Was it just a movie? The russians were the first into space, at least a russian dog was. The americans had to beat that.
 
Am I being more than usually obtuse here? This is what came up when I clicked on the link:
 

Attachments

  • sshot-5.png
    sshot-5.png
    4.8 KB · Views: 47
Julia said:
Am I being more than usually obtuse here? This is what came up when I clicked on the link:
Click to expand...
The CIA must have taken care of it. :cautious:
:D

Prawn,

I can't even remember what it was about.
 
Re: Did they really go to the moon and walk around?

nioka said:
Over the years I have always doubted the moon landings. If it was so easy then why haven't they been back.
Click to expand...
Who's to say they haven't? Just because the meeja hasn't reported it doesn't mean it didn't happen...
(hmm... too many negatives there... or not enough???)

But if it was so easy for the americans to do it, why haven't the russians followed.
Click to expand...
<Insert previous comment>

m.
 
Right on queue, Don Harold has something to say about conspiricy theories:

 
I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I'm a WTF'er (What the F^ck)

and when I saw this video of World Trade Centre Building 7, the third building that came down on 9/11, I went WTF!!!

 
conspiracy theories.. the majority seem to breed and hatch in the usofa... after their record with subprime.. dotcom... and.. well anytink that has impacted the world outside of their borders is always negative... sure, I'll buy their latest conspiracy offerings.. so long as as I can borrow from Freddie to finance it...
Jeers
.........G Brown..
 
We landed on the moon like 7 or 9 times and the final attempt was apollo 11 or 13 (the one they made a movie about) there really was nothing worth going back for, we had done all the tests available at the time and brought back samples, there was no need to colinise it as we may as well just make a space station that we can move ect. The moon is pointless to colinise. The reason that we are only now considering going back and that its such an issue is that safety standards are so much higher now then in the 60s and 70s. And the US wants to test equipment in low atmospheres for the hopeful trip to mars in the future.

As for that building, pfft what a heap of crap that youtube is, im an engineer and it is not probable for a buliding to collapse that way but still highly possible, get over it, it looked cool. The US used **** building standards regarding fireproofing and have changed them post 911. whatever
 
shmi said:
As for that building, pfft what a heap of crap that youtube is, im an engineer and it is not probable for a buliding to collapse that way but still highly possible, get over it, it looked cool. The US used **** building standards regarding fireproofing and have changed them post 911. whatever
Click to expand...
What building 7 really quite remarkably shows is a person's cognitive biases.

Those who believe in the bildiberger/NWO/whatever scenario see in B7 definite evidence of controlled implosion.

Those who believe in the good intentions of gu'mint believe it just happened that way from fire.

...AND BOTH CLAIM TO BE USING TRUE PRINCIPLES OF PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING.

Double pffffffft.

I'm in the "WTF?" camp too.

I could well and truly be either explanation, but a lot of questions as yet remain unanswered.

So WTF?
 
Apologies for the fact that the following is not about conspiracy theory.
It does, however, go to the woeful ignorance of Americans regarding matters outside of their own country.
(courtesy Crikey.com)

American people don't know much One overlooked revelation in the latest Pew Research Centre report. The 3,615 American people interviewed for the survey were asked: "Who is the current prime minister of Great Britain?" Results: 58% had no idea; 28% named Gordon Brown; 5% thought it was John Howard (former Australian PM); 4% named Robert Gates (US defence secretary); and 5% came up with the right answer, Rupert Murdoch. -- The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press
Click to expand...
 
shmi said:
We landed on the moon like 7 or 9 times and the final attempt was apollo 11 or 13 (the one they made a movie about)
Click to expand...
The final landing was the Apollo 17 mission. I remember watching it with a 3 year old and discussing how the astronauts were carrying all their air and water with them on their backs.
Probably his first lessons in environmentalism.

Ghoti (Space Groupie)
 
shmi said:
We landed on the moon like 7 or 9 times and the final attempt was apollo 11 or 13 (the one they made a movie about) there really was nothing worth going back for, we had done all the tests available at the time and brought back samples, there was no need to colinise it as we may as well just make a space station that we can move ect. The moon is pointless to colinise. The reason that we are only now considering going back and that its such an issue is that safety standards are so much higher now then in the 60s and 70s. And the US wants to test equipment in low atmospheres for the hopeful trip to mars in the future.

As for that building, pfft what a heap of crap that youtube is, im an engineer and it is not probable for a buliding to collapse that way but still highly possible, get over it, it looked cool. The US used **** building standards regarding fireproofing and have changed them post 911. whatever
Click to expand...

Yes as Ghoti says it was Apollo 17 the last mission. Apollo 11 was the first to land on the moon.LoL Apollo 13 had trouble as the movie shows everyone.

than the 60's. Yes they are. But when I see the night sky it has stars in it.
 

Similar threads

ShareSuccess
"Daily Inspiration"
5 6 7
Replies
121
Views
6K
farmerge
farmerge
ducati916
June 2025 DDD
3 4 5
Replies
80
Views
10K
Garpal Gumnut
Garpal Gumnut
tech/a
Retirement-Semi Retirement, (Tech/a personal study) implementation and discussion
2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
19K
Bellcose
B
ducati916
May DDD 2025
2 3
Replies
56
Views
9K
ducati916
ducati916
ducati916
August 2025 DDD
2 3
Replies
54
Views
7K
ducati916
ducati916
Top