- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 16,328
- Reactions
- 8,346
It seems to me that it's impossible to have a sensible relationship with a country that weaponises trade as much as China.
How about including the US in that statement ? As well of course as the UK ?
Historically and currently the US absolutely ties its political relationships with countries to how freely their businesses are allowed to operate. The crux of the issue is that the US government has historically taken the view that if a country does not openly welcome, court and accept any US investment they are not friendly.
The political consequences range from political attacks on the government, financial attacks on the economy and if necessary covert overthrow of the countries government.
I bring this point up because the US, in particular, stands behind its companies as political power. Other countries are more inclined to let governments deal with their businesses without resorting to political pressure. But nonetheless the whole point of being a big political power is to strengthen your economic interests internationally through trade and investment.
This is a thread about China bas, if you want to rant about the US start another thread.
Although you do have a point.
Of course not, it is an autocracy with wild capitalism liberating the best and worst of human ingenuity and entrepreneurshipI do not think China is a communist country.It may have started out with those intentions but now it is an autocracy that grows millionaires a plenty. There are differences but also common themes between US and China.
we should be the smiling face to all other nations, selling our goods and services.
The point is wanting to stop our economic relationship with China to be free of political pressure makes no sense in the overall context of international relations.
Yes it does. The US and China have completely different political systems, which one would you rather live under ?
Australia is far closer to the US system than it is to China's.How about our own political system which we freely elect and expect to be accountable to the Australian community. ?
We must stand up to China
I'm not saying it's right or wrong morally but as a business model that has a lot in common with prostitution. Anything at a price so long as it's legal.
As any smart hooker works out real quick, Australia's aim should be to take a ruthless approach to the business, make money, invest that into something else and get the hell out of it.
How about including the US in that statement ? As well of course as the UK ?
Historically and currently the US absolutely ties its political relationships with countries to how freely their businesses are allowed to operate. The crux of the issue is that the US government has historically taken the view that if a country does not openly welcome, court and accept any US investment they are not friendly.
The political consequences range from political attacks on the government, financial attacks on the economy and if necessary covert overthrow of the countries government.
I bring this point up because the US, in particular, stands behind its companies as political power. Other countries are more inclined to let governments deal with their businesses without resorting to political pressure. But nonetheless the whole point of being a big political power is to strengthen your economic interests internationally through trade and investment.
Yep, no one weaponises trade and finance more than the USA, not to mention no one weaponises actual weapons more than the USA.
The USA is the biggest Spy, The biggest Invader and War monger, The biggest Financial and trade enforcer, The biggest Arms dealer, and has its own pandemics eg Swine and Spanish flu.
I always remember watching a documentary on business dealings with Asia, the Australian custom of a handshake and your word, was a deal.Yes it does. The US and China have completely different political systems, which one would you rather live under ?
I don't want to be dominated by any other country, but where investment is required better the devil you know imo, and if there are a lot of US business interests here one would think they would be more likely to protect them militarily wouldn't one ?
Yes lots that were in Asian POW camps, as opposed to U.K camps.Yep, no one weaponises trade and finance more than the USA, not to mention no one weaponises actual weapons more than the USA.
The USA is the biggest Spy, The biggest Invader and War monger, The biggest Financial and trade enforcer, The biggest Arms dealer, and has its own pandemics eg Swine and Spanish flu.
But because they are white, and smiley most of the time, we are fine with it.
But the big bad Asians are scary to some insecure people.
Yes lots that were in Asian POW camps, as opposed to U.K camps.
Not saying the same would apply now, but from historical accounts, the British looked after their POW's far better than their Asian counterparts.
Just because someone is paying your bills, doesnt mean they have your best interest at heart, it just means you are a dependant.
Well I was born in the U.K and have grown up in Australia, so I really cant talk for Germany, Asia, the U.S or anyone else.And the Germans had death camps and bombed the crap out of London so Europeans are no better than the Asian
Examples you can think of, but I am sure you don’t think that matter of ancient History should affect European trade today.
Also, just remember the USA then Nuked the Japanese,.... twice, but yeah those pow camp conditions though....
Well I was born in the U.K and have grown up in Australia, so I really cant talk for Germany, Asia, the U.S or anyone else.
But as I said, talking up other cultures principles, doesnt really have the history to back it, but if you ard dependent on their generosity I can undestand talking it up. Many are.
This all started about the premise we need to develop a more sustainable business model, if we want to maintain our living standard smiling and thanking our buyers, when they are removing our cheap resources, works fine untill the easily removed resources are gone.Who is talking up other cultures principles?
I just saying let’s act like businessmen, smile at our customers and take their money.
You don’t have to make moral judgements about every single person you want to sell a bottle of wine or a ship load of Iron Ore too.
If you try to you will find flaws in every customer you have, even Australia has issues, and at the end of the day you can’t really change them foreign nations, So just do business, work on our own problems and lead by example.
This all started about the premise we need to develop a more sustainable business model, if we want to maintain our living standard smiling and thanking our buyers, when they are removing our cheap resources, works fine untill the easily removed resources are gone.
I know it wont be a problem in my lifetime, but my 8th grandchild will be born tomorrow, I dont ghink our business model will be in his best interest.
Leading by example IMO, is developing a business model that isnt just based on digging holes and selling the dirt, eventually you run out of dirt.
Just my opinion.
This all started about the premise we need to develop a more sustainable business model, if we want to maintain our living standard smiling and thanking our buyers, when they are removing our cheap resources, works fine untill the easily removed resources are gone.
I know it wont be a problem in my lifetime, but my 8th grandchild will be born tomorrow, I dont ghink our business model will be in his best interest.
Leading by example IMO, is developing a business model that isnt just based on digging holes and selling the dirt, eventually you run out of dirt.
Just my opinion.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?