GOOD. Some sense at last. Hadnt read that before my prior post.Breaking news.
Folau's Go Fund Me account has been terminated.
Another Group Think decision no doubt.
GoFundMe's statement:
“As a company, we are absolutely committed to the fight for equality for LGBTIQ+ people and fostering an environment of inclusivity. While we welcome GoFundMes engaging in diverse civil debate, we do not tolerate the promotion of discrimination or exclusion,” the statement read.
“In the days since Mr Folau's campaign launched, more than one million dollars have been donated to hundreds of other campaigns, large and small, across Australia. Those acts of kindness are the heart of GoFundMe.”
“Our platform exists to help people help others. Australians have shown themselves to be among the most kind and generous people in the world. We look forward to helping more Australians fundraise for causes they care about in the coming months and years.”
Or does it beg the question, who decides what can be funded and what can't? Who becomes the moral adjudicator on that one.So why did they get involved at all ?
Thats the defense its not the outcome.Folau wants to show his termination was based on his religion, and that is why he is going to the FWC.
Even if Folau were an atheist his social media foray breached the code of conduct which he undertook to uphold. RA know this and that is why they regard Folau's religion as incidental as that of an atheist who did the same thing.
It just shows how much leverage the 'virtue signalers have' IMO, now they can stop people giving money to what they feel is a good cause, so obviously 'Go Fund Me' is o.k as long as the 'left' agree with the cause. lolSo why did they get involved at all ?
It just shows how much leverage the 'virtue signalers have' IMO, now they can stop people giving money to what they feel is a good cause, so obviously 'Go Fund Me' is o.k as long as the 'left' agree with the cause. lol
It may unintentionally drag them into the into the mud, amazing how a storm in a teacup, can become a full blown cyclone.
So now what happens, Folau can't afford to take on the war chest of R.A, this isn't going to end well.
If Go Fund Me has already funded a similar case, it is setting a rather strange precedent, as you say the are either there to facilitate or they aren't.Yes that's right. Go Fund Me should just act as a broker or middleman between those who want funds and those willing to give them and shouldn't be a holier than thou judge of the merits of the case.
They obviously have the right to draw the line at criminal activities, but is seems that once again the group thinkers and virtue signallers have won.
Yes PC bull**** as a pretext to push the globalist view,
Grand scale mass manipulation
Ok now i have to give some cash to Israel.anyone knows how we can help fund his fight?
Rubbish! Folau clearly breached a provision of his employment!Absolutely nothing, same as what the rugby player said, it is just an opinion and it isn't against the law to have one. Yet
If that were the case, then why did they need to do something to curry favour with Folau's beliefs? What quality of person was attributed to them?In my opinion I do not think the comments were homophobic in the slightest. They did not seek to discriminate or disadvantage LGBT people at all.
I have never seen that was the case against Folau - what he did was use social media inappropriately.It is curious that only homosexuality was selected, and please, ffs, the idea that this brings the ra into disrepute is totally ludicrous, as per my earlier argunent.
But you keep suggesting RA has acted unlawfully, and cannot show how.Thats the defense its not the outcome.
what he did was use social media inappropriately.
Yes, because in Folau's case, he signed a contract which included those conditions, and they were lawful.According to his employer , which as I've demonstrated could cover a multitude of sins, real or imagined that employers could conjure up as an excuse to sack someone they don't like.
Well that is what the courts are there for, obviously someone was worried, to force the withdrawl of funding.Rubbish! Folau clearly breached a provision of his employment!
Um no... I was originally showing that you didn't know the law prior.But you keep suggesting RA has acted unlawfully, and cannot show how.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?