CanOz
Home runs feel good, but base hits pay bills!
- Joined
- 11 July 2006
- Posts
- 11,544
- Reactions
- 521
Luck adjusted, would you expect traders to have the skill in the first 3 years to make a significant profit?
Felipe
Maybe you could give is an insight to your general approach, What strategies you're using, when and you're rational?
So, what are some disturbing findings in this?
Ok, where do we start? Do you really know that this method of yours actually works? Have you back-tested, and forward tested it? If so, were the results of these tests good? Because you really shouldn't be committing any real money to the market until you know with fairly high probability that the method really works.
So, first step is finding a profitable method, and proving to yourself with a reasonable degree of confidence that it does really work, before committing any money to the market. It seems to me by your results that you haven't even got this far.
For your results to be that bad, something is obviously very wrong. You should stop trading immediately, and go back to the drawing board. Find out why the system isn't working. Make changes until it does work, or develop a different method that does produce good test results. Then you should paper trade (or else trade with small dollar amounts) at first to verify that the method that worked in testing, does work in the real world. Only then would I go back to trading with the full account size.
Felipe
Can you tell me the typical way you lose versus the typical way you win. Are they large losers our many small losers just whittling away your account.
.... And, if you were trying straight stocks, do you think you'd be winning or losing?
I see two potential problem areas but need this info to help.
Felipe said:One of the biggest problems I have in my view, is the lack of network of like minded people. Every loss i make, I am left there scratching my head and no one else really to give me there opinion, atleast not someone who is actually making money.
Value Collector said:When it comes to T/a, in my opinion studying TA rather than fundamental analysis, is like studying astrology instead of astronomy, or alchemy instead of chemistry, you can dedicate your life to astrology and never learn anything of real use, sure some predictions will be right through chance.
Felipe said:Position sizing....does that mean. ...and I have not traded like this but just for an egsample....
If i had 100k in my account, and i had a 10k position, would placing my stop at the 1% loss ($1000) be what other traders are doing?
Or.....no matter what even if its a spread you absolute maximum loss. ....even if stops are gaps etc.....it would be 1%?
I'll admit, i was putting up to 7k trades on, and then setting my stop/limit at roughly what the 1% loss would be.....most times though, i get gapped, then I'm losing 10%....
Silly, silly..
You are relatively killing it on the pay scale. I had to save my 2nd trading fund (first fund was from my mum, which I blew out) from a below minimum wage cash in hand job. You're at a huge head start capital wise, and time wise it sounds like, than most people.Felipe said:I am not a guy with bad paying job looking for a get rich quick scheme, I actually have what would be concidered a relatively well paying job of 320k + P/A and i only work half the year, I could see the rest of my work life on that wage.
Sorry only saw this thread now
I'm sensing a bit of a "GIMME"/blaming mentality. Retail trading is a very personal thing, even different people trading the same method will end up with vastly different trades. I don't see how anyone but yourself can turn YOUR trading around in the end.
My core intraday strategy on going long/short (not spreading or options) S&P has a 80% strike rate using pure TA. Felipe has obviously taken up TA as it suits his personality, I really don't see how this part of your post helps whatsoever - it only misdirects, the TAvsFA really belongs to another thread.
From your losses it obviously sounds like too many trades ended up costing more than you originally planned, I'm guessing a tight stop so resulting in high leverage which really chews up your account when it goes pass your stop due to gaps/frozen in fear/not closing. You need wider stops which will result in lower leverage and lower P&L volatility. Cant really give anymore advice without knowing more details on your methods which I am not going to go over the details of.
You are relatively killing it on the pay scale. I had to save my 2nd trading fund (first fund was from my mum, which I blew out) from a below minimum wage cash in hand job. You're at a huge head start capital wise, and time wise it sounds like, than most people.
From what I gather, OptionVue & Market Analyst RRG, I'm assuming you're studying under Paul W. ? Havn't uncovered anything bad about this guy yet but selling 2 programs + ongoing data subscriptions sounds a bit overkill and is questionable, without results to prove. Besides back trader, I do not believe a retail trader trading simple spreads require Optionvue. Market Analyst probably also.
The description of your method sounds interesting, finding strong sectors and stocks sounds solid but then your entry criteria of double bottom and MA/BB/RSI sounds like the usual traps .
When reviewing your trades, one thing that can help is profiling the volatility behaviour of the underlying you're trading.
For example, two stocks may have the same implied volatility (lets say 30%) but say Stock A has historically had more moves beyond 2 standard deviations than Stock B . Your rules might class 30% as "low IV" and buy Stock B, even though it is not optimal.
seem to me you lack the knowledge to trade options. Read option market making by baird inside out and till you understand everything and that should build your foundation to understand options.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?