IFocus
You are arguing with a Galah
- Joined
- 8 September 2006
- Posts
- 8,144
- Reactions
- 5,457
You have to be joking start with RU486
Did he? Can you let us know what these were?
Yeah you got to love WA 2 weeks on 1week off 180k a year and practically illiterate imagine what i could earn if i was as smart as you the mind boggles
You have to be joking start with RU486
Mifepristone was banned in Australia in 1996. In late 2005, a Private Member's bill was introduced to the Australian Senate to lift the ban and transfer the power of approval to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). The move caused much debate in the Australian media and amongst politicians. The Bill passed the Senate on 10 February 2006, and whilst mifepristone is now legal for use in Australia, as of yet, no drug company has applied to import and distribute it. Currently there are only a couple of known instances where a doctor has applied to the TGA for dispensing mifepristone in specific cases.
And yet you hate the big miners. If it wasn't for the big miners an unskilled bloke like you would be a dole bludger.
Do you need to be sarcastic? I asked you politely because offhand I couldn't think of anything.
Mad monk. That's a bit deceptive and you know like all Labor that it is wrong.Julia did not think I was sarcastic Abbotts nic the mad monk is for good reason I am sure Wiki should have some thing.........
That's the Greenies' excuse. They claim that by ruining the economy now they can make the world a better place for their grandchildren. A real heartstring tugger. Commonsense says just the opposite. But as I said above Greenies are irresponsible.
What then is the economic impact of a total tax take of 66.5% on resource profits ?If approached the correct way how do you know it will ruin the economy?
.
The difference is very important, in that Labor needed Nick Xenophon and Steve Fielding to get any legislation through and these two independents usually held a view on pretty much anything that was contrary to that of the government. If the Greens have the balance of power all to themselves there is no mediating influence and their nuttiness can prevail. We can only hope that in such a situation, the two major parties would manage to come to a compromise and make the Greens irrelevant.
Julia did not think I was sarcastic Abbotts nic the mad monk is for good reason I am sure Wiki should have some thing.........
It is therefore only appropriate I now turn that attack on Abbott for listening to his spin doctors instead of his own political instincts and choosing to cower away from the sort of scrutiny a debate allows.
The irony that Abbott, the man who has been railing against the "faceless men" of Labor, will have his own faceless men to thank for shielding him from the scrutiny of a debate would push Australian politics to a new low in the election's aftermath.
Mad monk. That's a bit deceptive and you know like all Labor that it is wrong.
Do you need to be sarcastic? I asked you politely because offhand I couldn't think of anything.
In 2006 the Libs were still in power.
The Labor government hasn't exactly shown any enthusiasm for its use, given how difficult it is for doctors to obtain and prescribe it.
OK, what other decisions has he made that have been dictated by his religious beliefs?
Abbott said. He listed what they had achieved. "This government's decisions to: overturn the Northern Territory's euthanasia law, ban gay marriage, stop the ACT heroin trial, provide additional financial support for one-income families and try to reduce abortion numbers through pregnancy support counselling, show that the tide of secular humanism was not as irreversible as (Santamaria) thought either … the DLP is alive and well and living inside the Howard government…"
It is this nudging of Australia towards social conservatism that worries feminists, such as the bio-ethicist and writer Leslie Cannold. "There's little question he would do everything he could short of bringing issues before Parliament to progress his views on abortion, stem cells and dying with dignity," she says. "He would use his power of appointments to boards, research institutes, and so on to influence the agenda."
If approached the correct way how do you know it will ruin the economy? To counter your slur, thats what the right wing extremist's always say.
Lets look at the idea and see if from a conceptual point putting more back into our own country may infact make it better for ourselves. Protectionist maybe, but notice Russia the last day or so indicating that with wheat. Tough times, tougher ideas and realities perhaps.
As a Minister Abbott was anti-abortion, anti-contraception, anti-IVF, anti-stem cell research and wanted to ban no-fault divorce.
Yep its all wrong
What then is the economic impact of a total tax take of 66.5% on resource profits ?
The usual nonsense post from you.
I know that as an ex-copper you can't tolerate dissent, and making false accusations is normal practice. However perhaps you can tell me what the "slur" is that you are trying to fit me up with.
And who are these "right wing extremists"? Are they Coalition voters? The Party with the most extreme views is the Greens.
And there is reference to the faceless men of the Liberal Party
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/election/locals-say-that-abbott-is-right-up-our-street/story-fn5zm695-1225898197721A man who lives just above the Abbotts says we won't find anyone who'll say a bad word about Abbott.
He's right. They love him. Not as a politician but, I think, for being a man who has raised nice children, has a nice wife and works hard.
"He's a nice guy, believe me," the man says. "I wouldn't like to see you write a single derogatory word about him. I'm not saying everyone has the same political views, but he's a good family man.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?