There are many trading concepts that I’m somewhat skeptical about. The merits of candlestick patterns certainly fall into that category.
Being a former intraday trader, these patterns seemed to be great at missing the entire move as in reality all the buying and selling that goes on in short term moves can’t be seen on a chart. So candlesticks always appear a little late to the party in my opinion.
However there are some patterns that as a trader appear to have merit. The hammer for instance is one such pattern that appears to look like it should conceivably identify a turning point of sorts. So I thought I would test that particular pattern out on a large universe of stocks on a daily timeframe.

I constructed the following criteria:

It’s fair to say that I was stunned that not only did this strategy turn a profit, but the equity curve looked reasonable.
However when we dive into the metrics there does seem to be a few issues that we have to address.
CAGR 13.33%
MaxDD -44.12%
Sharpe Ratio 0.44
Winners 53.05%
Just looking at these numbers we can clearly see that this isn’t an amazing strategy. That said this is not optimized on any level and is purely for the purposes of seeing if there is any merit to candlestick patterns.
For a point of comparison the XAOA has returned 8.9% pa since 1990 so in terms of an absolute return then our simple hammer trading strategy isn’t looking so bad.
If there are any particular candlestick patterns anyone wants tested, please leave a comment below.
rowancrosby.com
Being a former intraday trader, these patterns seemed to be great at missing the entire move as in reality all the buying and selling that goes on in short term moves can’t be seen on a chart. So candlesticks always appear a little late to the party in my opinion.
However there are some patterns that as a trader appear to have merit. The hammer for instance is one such pattern that appears to look like it should conceivably identify a turning point of sorts. So I thought I would test that particular pattern out on a large universe of stocks on a daily timeframe.

I constructed the following criteria:
- ASX200 plus historical constituents back to 1992
- Stock is above its 200-day SMA
- Buy on the next open after we get the ‘hammer’ chart pattern
- Sell on the next open if the closing price is greater than the 5 period SMA
- Maximum of 10 positions at 10% each
- 0.08% commissions

It’s fair to say that I was stunned that not only did this strategy turn a profit, but the equity curve looked reasonable.
However when we dive into the metrics there does seem to be a few issues that we have to address.
CAGR 13.33%
MaxDD -44.12%
Sharpe Ratio 0.44
Winners 53.05%
Just looking at these numbers we can clearly see that this isn’t an amazing strategy. That said this is not optimized on any level and is purely for the purposes of seeing if there is any merit to candlestick patterns.
For a point of comparison the XAOA has returned 8.9% pa since 1990 so in terms of an absolute return then our simple hammer trading strategy isn’t looking so bad.
If there are any particular candlestick patterns anyone wants tested, please leave a comment below.
rowancrosby.com