Garpal Gumnut
Ross Island Hotel
- Joined
- 2 January 2006
- Posts
- 15,067
- Reactions
- 13,516
Nonsense. You didn't need a crystal ball. The market peaked in November 2007 and by the end of December the bad news just kept on coming.
I did sell my shares then and moved to cash so your suggestion that I'm only talking in hindsight is completely wrong.
Plenty of other people did the same. I surely didn't have any monopoly on making such a decision.
I will ignore your suggestion about 'blatant lies'. Just demonstrates your ignorance.
I am being ignorant? Really?
I'd say that, well might many financial advisors be feeling uneasy. What business do they have in calling themselves financial advisers if they can't read the economic climate appropriately and advise their clients accordingly???
To advise, e.g. clients who are close to retirement, or already retired not to have preservation of capital as their first requirement is imo incompetence at best.
This is a forum. A forum is a venue for the exchange of ideas.
You postulated an argument. I disagreed with it.
I think you are overlooking the fact that it is decidedly in the interests of those financial advisers who have placed clients into managed funds( which are paying those financial advisers very healthy trailing commissions for every year those clients remain in those funds) to encourage those clients to remain in those investments. In so doing, in many instances they will have significantly disadvantaged those clients.
Maybe read the Storm thread for the some examples of this.
That's just a perfectly silly and irrelevant remark.
However, you probably wouldn't have done that because to do so would have cut off all your trailing commissions.
I think this is spot on Julia – this commission and trailing commission business makes a mockery of an FA being able to offer independent advice; like you said, cash doesn’t pay a trailing commission.
Most FAs are salespeople - not that there is anything wrong with that, but lets dispense with the naive notion that they are somehow ‘professionals’ with client interests foremost. I have no doubt some do, but not most of ‘em.
I think this is spot on Julia – this commission and trailing commission business makes a mockery of an FA being able to offer independent advice; like you said, cash doesn’t pay a trailing commission.
Most FAs are salespeople - not that there is anything wrong with that, but lets dispense with the naive notion that they are somehow ‘professionals’ with client interests foremost. I have no doubt some do, but not most of ‘em.
has anyone got any views on the Kaplan course thing? im trying to set it up for psotgrad next year....
I've recently began my graduate certificate in applied finance with Kaplan. So far it seems pretty good. I'm learning a lot - wouldn't know how it compares to other finance courses out there as my studying background has been in engineering.
from what ive looked at the only knewish material would be the orignal core ones, the whole ivnestment elective stream with valuations etc ive done through my proeprty economics degree i presume.. over how long do you plan on doing it? a friend was saying it may be difficult with work to do 2 subs per trimester
I'm planning to do those 4 core subjects - one per trimester so it's going to take me 16 months. I work full time as well and I am just handling the one subject. It's quite possible to be able to do 2 subjects + work but then you won't have much spare time.
also depends how hard you study i guess... ive gotten through uni with night before and day of for the past 3.5 years with a average just over 70... you reckon thatll fly?
haha yea easy! It wouldn't be hard to pass - you only need a combined Exam and Assignment score of > 50.
But I think you'd wanna get more out of the course than that.
thats a given, im there to learn not do mind numbing assessments, hopefully its like that
im getting confused...
im trying to read up a bit on it on invested but still getting confused?
there is a difference between the postgrad and the financial planning courses isnt there? I dont really wanna be a financial planner....
im thinking of doing the headstart for next trimester and do a subject or two as I only have 3 subjects for my last semester at uni...
would someone explain to me the difference in the two types of courses? or even if there is 2 courses, cos when people talk about it they seem to only be talking about financial planning...
there are a number of courses out there.
what you are getting mixed up with are:
- Diploma of Financial Services, this ISNT postgrad
http://www.kaplanprofessional.edu.au/Financial_Services/Vocational_Education/DFSFP
- Graduate Diploma of Applied Finance, this IS postgrad (ie. you need a degree or significant work experience to enrol)
http://www.kaplanprofessional.edu.au/Financial_Services/Postgraduate_Education/GDAF
They are two seperate courses.
Edit: The more comprehensive course is the Grad Dip, but it all depends on your goals
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?