question - in the instance of the flash crash in 2010 and similar events - if you had a CFD on the Dow 30 with say CMCmarkets (as I do), and the market dropped 1000pts etc and returned back up in moments - your stop losses within that threshold, along with any other buy orders and their stop losses, would all be triggered (and you'd lose big). These assumptions are all correct - right?
Not to mention dodgy CFD providers could deny or modify certain trades in their favour, as sometimes they apparently do (eg. if you picked up something really low during the flash crash and it didn't get stopped out - riding the recovery).
If so, then the only way to protect yourself is to have massive stops (say 50% minimum of face value) and put down the required cash into the CFD account?
This is a danger I've considered recently as I've been investing (more than trading) via cfds in indexes and forex a little, and have been hoping to increase it as my preferred method given their very low cost and ease of monitoring.
Does anyone have any other insight/experience in this idea, or anything to add?
question - in the instance of the flash crash in 2010 and similar events - if you had a CFD on the Dow 30 with say CMCmarkets (as I do), and the market dropped 1000pts etc and returned back up in moments - your stop losses within that threshold, along with any other buy orders and their stop losses, would all be triggered (and you'd lose big). These assumptions are all correct - right?
Not to mention dodgy CFD providers could deny or modify certain trades in their favour, as sometimes they apparently do (eg. if you picked up something really low during the flash crash and it didn't get stopped out - riding the recovery).
If so, then the only way to protect yourself is to have massive stops (say 50% minimum of face value) and put down the required cash into the CFD account?
This is a danger I've considered recently as I've been investing (more than trading) via cfds in indexes and forex a little, and have been hoping to increase it as my preferred method given their very low cost and ease of monitoring.
Does anyone have any other insight/experience in this idea, or anything to add?
question - in the instance of the flash crash in 2010 and similar events - if you had a CFD on the Dow 30 with say CMCmarkets (as I do), and the market dropped 1000pts etc and returned back up in moments - your stop losses within that threshold, along with any other buy orders and their stop losses, would all be triggered (and you'd lose big). These assumptions are all correct - right?
Not to mention dodgy CFD providers could deny or modify certain trades in their favour, as sometimes they apparently do (eg. if you picked up something really low during the flash crash and it didn't get stopped out - riding the recovery).
If so, then the only way to protect yourself is to have massive stops (say 50% minimum of face value) and put down the required cash into the CFD account?
This is a danger I've considered recently as I've been investing (more than trading) via cfds in indexes and forex a little, and have been hoping to increase it as my preferred method given their very low cost and ease of monitoring.
Does anyone have any other insight/experience in this idea, or anything to add?
question - in the instance of the flash crash in 2010 and similar events - if you had a CFD on the Dow 30 with say CMCmarkets (as I do), and the market dropped 1000pts etc and returned back up in moments - your stop losses within that threshold, along with any other buy orders and their stop losses, would all be triggered (and you'd lose big). These assumptions are all correct - right?
If you have a tight-ish stop on u would have been fine. The market didnt gap down 1000 pts but rather moved (although very fast).
If you didn't have a stop though the position would have probably run into margin call, and as it crashed, you would have been forced out by the CFD provider.
great responses guys, ty.
And additionally, it would be stupid to think a CFD provider wouldn't take advantage of you if there were an event that occurred in a way that their orders couldn't be executed to sell off your contract while the physical market flashed down and up, right? or any similar freak scenario where the result is in your favour?
I personally don't think the major CFD providers are as dodgy as some people think. I've only used IG markets but they seem to play a pretty straight bat. If you think about it they could make plenty of money without having to do dodgy stuff with orders and they'd be asking for regulatory trouble and reputational damage if they were doing dodgy stuff.
Do you mean to say that they'd be concerned about getting into trouble with that regulator called ASIC?
I believe that's the same regulator that's been liberally issuing AFSL's to shonky operators all over Australia for some years now.
Hadn't you noticed the numerous other threads on this forum where posters complain about having lost large sums of money after being mislead by licensed financial service providers?
Banco, I'd be interested to know if you have ever been able to achieve consistent profits from your trading activities with IG's OTC CFD's?
I'd also like your assurance that you have no relationship with IG Markets beyond that of being their client.
I'm far from ASIC"s biggest fan but I don't think they are quite as toothless as you think. It's no secret that CFD's are under the regulatory microscope and in terms of risk/reward why would they open themselves up to regulatory action if they can do well playing it straight?
Yes I've noticed those threads. Frankly they mainly seem to involve investing with some conman on the gold coast. Not exactly shocking that those kinds of arrangements turn pear shape. As I've said on here a few times a financial firm been located on the gold coast is a very bad sign.
I finished up around 17& last year solely trading asx cfds (not dma) last year on IG markets and I'm up substantially this year (admittedly we are in a ball market). They may well do dodgy things with forex and indices but the prices on the asx cfds seem to track the underlying market.
I have no affiliation with IG markets.
...
Market maker CFD providers may also hedge the CFDs they offer, but these arrangements are generally less transparent than for direct market access providers. Market makers may not hedge all the CFD trades you place, and so may directly benefit if you lose on your trade.
...
While it might seem good to be able to trade whenever you want, there are additional risks involved if the CFD provider lets you trade when the market is closed. When the underlying market is closed, you can’t check how CFD prices compare to market prices, which could result in price distortions.
...
CFD providers will also usually set a ‘liquidation’ level on your CFD trading account. This is the level at which any open CFD trades will be closed if you do not have enough money in your account to cover adverse movements on your trades...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?