Yes. What's your point?@Nemo Data, are you acquainted with the following?:
Nemo said:CFDs transactions are all about leverage
No, I've used the term correctly. It is a leveraged position. Margin is the amount of leverage the CFD company allows you to use in a given CFD contract.should that read - all about margin - from an accounting/tax perspective ?
should that read - all about margin - from an accounting/tax perspective ?[/QUOTE
No, I've used the term correctly. It is a leveraged position. Margin is the amount of leverage the CFD company allows you to use in a given CFD contract.
Leverage is more akin to the result of borrowing and using the purchase as security to fund more borrowing which results in magnified capacity to borrow. Where as margin is more a defined set of leverage that can be used as a buffer before your position closes out
Yes. What's your point?
I thought you said that you were acquainted with:Hi Cynic,
1. Those sections do not apply.
2. CFDs themselves are not forex transactions
3. CFD contracts are not capital in nature.
4. Should you go through the process of having a separate audit for 2 years for as well as having your accounts certified as presented in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, a rational person my just go the cheaper and more relevant route, of hiring a bookkeeper.
Thanks for the random comment though, I don't mind the exercise.
I thought you said that you were acquainted with:
https://www.ato.gov.au/law/view/document?docid=TXR/TR200515/NAT/ATO/00001
I am not seeking to offend either, but I do believe my input is both relevant, and helpful, to those whom might otherwise be induced into believing that bookkeepers offer the most viable solution, to a matter, which in truth, should ideally require the services of a competent taxation lawyer.I don't mean to offend, but its possible we have a miscommunication glitch here as I am not entirely sure we are talking about this same thing on point.
Please shoot me through an email to jeffstricke@gmail.com and we can discuss further rather than clogging up a public board on topics not relevant not helpful to the rest of the community.
Thanks
J
I am not seeking to offend either, but I do believe my input is both relevant, and helpful, to those whom might otherwise be induced into believing that bookkeepers offer the most viable solution, to a matter, which in truth, should ideally require the services of a competent taxation lawyer.
Neither of the two - I am an uneducated cynic (in case you hadn't noticed).It's a pity you decided not to take me up with my offer. You're dragging me into this, but I tried. I don't know why, are you a CPA or CA?:
That may be true.A bookkeeper is more than sufficient for the preparation of the grunt work and being accountable for processing the transactions into software, ready for a review by a tax agent, should the client not feel informed enough about the content allowing them to make a decision by themselves.
I do not share your confidence on this point.A bookkeeper can perform the transaction recording duties for this type of business just in the same way they do it for anything else.
Not quite!Not including the Tax Return, you would recommend charging by the minimum:
Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance with AASB: Accountant's Fees
+ Audit Fees : Unqualified Statement from an Auditor sits somewhere between $5,000 - $10,000.
Why would anyone do that?
Paying professional service fees when you could just invite your accountant into your software, where everything is ready for you to go and been prepared by someone who has an inkling of what they are doing, is stupid. If that's what you do, that's your business.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?